M
malkad
Guest
Is the priest’s washing of hands before the Eucharistic Prayer merely symbolic?
Yes, I agree but also I have seen priests blow their nose before the Lavabo so it incorporates a complete cleansing and respect for the people.I’m wondering how you meant “symbolic”. It does have a symbolic element to it, but it also does clean the hands of the priest before he is going to be handling the Body and Blood of Christ. Everyone who is going to be handling God’s Body and Blood should wash/cleanse their hands at the bare minimum.
Because in most of the world there is only COTT allowed. The US has been allowed a dispensation for COTH.So, my next question is, “Why is this required only of the celebrant/priest?”
I may be wrong, but there I think the symbolic action also has a connection with the Gospels, when Pontius Pilate washes his hands, symbolically saying that Jesus was innocent. As for why this is required only of the celebrant/priest, I believe you answered your own question with the assumption that it has to do with the sanctity of handling the Body and Blood of Christ. When a priest is ordained, his hands are anointed with the Chrism oil. The priest is the only one able to act in the person of Christ (in persona Christi) and offer the bread and wine for the celebration of the Eucharist.This is from the Catholic Encyclopedia: “The principle of washing the hands before celebrating the holy Liturgy — at first an obvious practical precaution of cleanness, then interpreted also symbolically — occurs naturally in all rites.”
So it would seem not to be merely symbolic. And although the CE doesn’t address the “why” behind the practice, I would assume it does have to do with the sanctity of handling the Body of Christ.
So, my next question is, “Why is this required only of the celebrant/priest?”
No, this isn’t so. When we last covered this question, it was obvious from the reports of posters either from personal experience or from consulting websites of the various Bishops’ Conferences round the world that ‘only COTT allowed’ was very much the exception.Because in most of the world there is only COTT allowed. The US has been allowed a dispensation for COTH.
Pilate wasn’t so much saying Jesus was innocent as saying that he was not accepting any responsibility for what happened to Him. From there came the expression “washing one’s hands” of something. That’s not part of the Lavabo Rite which is a symbolic purification before offering the Sacrifice.I may be wrong, but there I think the symbolic action also has a connection with the Gospels, when Pontius Pilate washes his hands, symbolically saying that Jesus was innocent. As for why this is required only of the celebrant/priest, I believe you answered your own question with the assumption that it has to do with the sanctity of handling the Body and Blood of Christ. When a priest is ordained, his hands are anointed with the Chrism oil. The priest is the only one able to act in the person of Christ (in persona Christi) and offer the bread and wine for the celebration of the Eucharist.
I have been an altar server at hundreds of Masses and have never seen a priest scrub. It is a few ounces of ordinary tap water poured over the priests hands or fingers. I have never seen a priest with visibly dirty hands.This is from the Catholic Encyclopedia: “The principle of washing the hands before celebrating the holy Liturgy — at first an obvious practical precaution of cleanness, then interpreted also symbolically — occurs naturally in all rites.”
So it would seem not to be merely symbolic. And although the CE doesn’t address the “why” behind the practice, I would assume it does have to do with the sanctity of handling the Body of Christ.
So, my next question is, “Why is this required only of the celebrant/priest?”
Forgive my ignorance, what do these acronyms stand for?Because in most of the world there is only COTT allowed. The US has been allowed a dispensation for COTH.
Communion On The Tongue and Communion On/in The Hands, but I don’t see how it’s relevant here.Forgive my ignorance, what do these acronyms stand for?
Does the lavabo ritual have a purpose, a function? Is it a mere precautionary measure toward cleanliness, like we might perform before any meal–or does it signify something deeper? If it signifies that the consecrated Host is, through transubstantiation, the Real Presence of the Body and Blood of Christ, then why would just anyone be allowed to handle it?Communion On The Tongue and Communion On/in The Hands, but I don’t see how it’s relevant here.
I may be wrong, but there I think the symbolic action also has a connection with the Gospels, when Pontius Pilate washes his hands, symbolically saying that Jesus was innocent. As for why this is required only of the celebrant/priest, I believe you answered your own question with the assumption that it has to do with the sanctity of handling the Body and Blood of Christ. When a priest is ordained, his hands are anointed with the Chrism oil. The priest is the only one able to act in the person of Christ (in persona Christi) and offer the bread and wine for the celebration of the Eucharist.
Okay but the Lavabo would be in the Mass whether the congregation were able to receive or not.Does the lavabo ritual have a purpose, a function? Is it a mere precautionary measure toward cleanliness, like we might perform before any meal–or does it signify something deeper? If it signifies that the consecrated Host is, through transubstantiation, the Real Presence of the Body and Blood of Christ, then why would just anyone be allowed to handle it?