I
ibkc
Guest
Elsewhere on the forum, there is a fundamentalist making the argument that only those who are born again can be counted as children of God. He cites as proof:
Can someone give me a Catholic perspective on this?
Romans 8:10-16. Notice that verse 15 tells us that we are children of God only after we were adopted by Him.
Romans 9:8. Notice that paul specifically says “they are not the children of God”
Galatians 3:26. How does this verse say that people become children of God? By faith. The unsaved do not have this faith.
Colosians 3:6. Again, Paul clearly seperates the unsaved, who are not children of God, from those who are saved, who are the children of God.
1 John 3:10. This is the most clear of all of them: the wicked are not children of God, but children of the Devil, while those who are born again are children of God
John 1:12. Who are the sons of God? Those who have received Christ. The unsaved have not received Christ. They reject Him.
Romans 8:24. Who are those who are the sons of God? Those who are led by the Holy Spirit. The unsaved do not have the Holy Spirit
My feeling on this is that taking a strictly literal interpretation of this leads to all sorts of weird places. In the first place, if God made the world and everyone in it, then we all are His children, right? Some of us may be lost and wandering, like the Prodigal Son, and some of us may be in outright rebellion against God, but that is because we have free will. It seems to me that saying that those who are not born again are literally the Devil’s children, makes the Devil co-equal with God, which is of course incorrect.1 John 3:2. Notice that he says “Now that we are sons of God”, thus implying that there was a time (in this case, before they were born again) that they were not children of God.
Can someone give me a Catholic perspective on this?