D
davidv
Guest
What part of post 118 did you not understand? It seems quite clear to me what the main objection is.Good. I am open to discuss my argument with you. But first I need your objections.{snip}.
What part of post 118 did you not understand? It seems quite clear to me what the main objection is.Good. I am open to discuss my argument with you. But first I need your objections.{snip}.
I don’t see the objection and I would be happy if you clarify it.What part of post 118 did you not understand? It seems quite clear to me what the main objection is.
I’ll will attempt to summarize:I don’t see the objection and I would be happy if you clarify it.
But the contrary can be correct too.I’ll will attempt to summarize:
OP: “We cannot deduce the existence of God”
Objection: St. Thomas Aquinace deduced the existence of God.
Therefore the OP is false.
How can this be? The logical principle of non-contraction indicates that an item and its contrary cannot both be true.But the contrary can be correct too.
Hence he is wrong. Why? Because metaphysical concept has to be simple so an average person could understand it because God is simple.How can this be? The logical principle of non-contraction indicates that an item and its contrary cannot both be true.
We are conscious beings and we cannot deduce things we haven’t experienced. Like when a person wants to deduce love without falling in love. We have to face ourselves to make the sense of Self.What is the contrary?
Newton also was correct for almost 300 years and he had the very basic fact, objective reality, in his disposal.Thomas’ deduction is a matter of factual history. His deduction has survived many decades of intense scutiny, and has never been shown to use invalid logic.
Who is the “he” in the above?Hence he is wrong.
I have no idea what this means. I think you are misusing the term, simple.Why? Because metaphysical concept has to be simple so an average person could understand it because God is simple.
How do you know this?We are conscious beings and we cannot deduce things we haven’t experienced.
So what does this have to do you with Aquinas’s deductions?Like when a person wants to deduce love without falling in love. We have to face ourselves to make the sense of Self.
Newton also was correct for almost 300 years and he had the very basic fact, objective reality, in his disposal.
Thomas.Who is the “he” in the above?
God is simple. That is what Jesus said. Hence the metaphysical concept that define reality in the core has to be simple.I have no idea what this means. I think you are misusing the term, simple.
I gave you an example: Like when a person wants to deduce love without falling in love. We have to face ourselves to make the sense of Self.How do you know this?
His proof is very hard for an average person. Hence he is wrong.So what does this have to do you with Aquinas’s deductions?
What does simple mean in this context?Thomas.
God is simple. That is what Jesus said. Hence the metaphysical concept that define reality in the core has to be simple.
Examples do not demonstrate how you know. Besides, I don’t believe your example is true.I gave you an example: Like when a person wants to deduce love without falling in love. We have to face ourselves to make the sense of Self.
Oh really? You really degraded your credibility with this one.His proof is very hard for an average person. Hence he is wrong.
What is simple? It is something that a kid can understand. Otherwise it is no knowledge. Quoted from Einstein.What does simple mean in this context?
We have to face ourselves to make the sense of Self. I keep practicing it and I get a positive result always.Examples do not demonstrate how you know. Besides, I don’t believe your example is true.
I will make it.Oh really? You really degraded your credibility with this one.
Many people think that the idea of a Trinitarian God is not simple.Because metaphysical concept has to be simple so an average person could understand it because God is simple.
Jesus clearly mentioned that God is simple. People makes stories based on false understanding and then contradicting their own belief.Many people think that the idea of a Trinitarian God is not simple.
That is completely False. Jesus never said that.Jesus clearly mentioned that God is simple.
I agree. I search Bible and there was no phrase like that. So I quote Einstein.That is completely False. Jesus never said that.
Also, you are apparently unaware of the fact that Jesus IS God. Additionally, God the Father is God and The Holy Spirit is God. That is not simple.
Making blatently false Fase statements does not help your credibility.
And I doubt Einstein said it either.I agree. I search Bible and there was no phrase like that. So I quote Einstein.
Actually to be correct, Einstein said that “knowledge should be simple so a kid can understand it”. It is very easy to search Bible these days. You need one of those on-line Bible.And I doubt Einstein said it either.
Gee Bahman, you searched the whole Bible since yesterday? Sounds like a Paul Bunyon stroy to me.
Linus2nd
Seriously? Do you want to discuss the premises with me? Are you dare?This thread is meandering, pointless and ill defined.
Have a great weekend folks.
Yes, it’s pretty much run its course. The MODs can terminate this one any time.This thread is meandering, pointless and ill defined.
Have a great weekend folks.