O
OraLabora
Guest
I think the Church has spoken on this, through her hierarchy, expressing a desire for more charitable language; while the current 2008 EF prayer is more “direct” than the OF prayer, it is far less inflammatory than the 1962 missal; no matter what the correct Latin root of the translation to “perfidious” is, readers of today’s English will associate the word with treason.
Any further discussions strikes me as trying to figure out how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. We all have our preferences, and we all have our differences; for some, charitable language works better, others prefer themselves to be told directly in harsh terms. Part of the variety of the human condition I guess, we’re all different.
What matters to us as Catholics is that in liturgical matters, it isn’t we, the laity, that get to decide. Roma locuta est , causa finita est…
Any further discussions strikes me as trying to figure out how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. We all have our preferences, and we all have our differences; for some, charitable language works better, others prefer themselves to be told directly in harsh terms. Part of the variety of the human condition I guess, we’re all different.
What matters to us as Catholics is that in liturgical matters, it isn’t we, the laity, that get to decide. Roma locuta est , causa finita est…