S
Sultan_Of_Swing
Guest
I am referring to the Vatican Bank.Actually, every Catholic Parish and Diocese gives it members a detailed fiscal report every year and are quite transparent.
I am referring to the Vatican Bank.Actually, every Catholic Parish and Diocese gives it members a detailed fiscal report every year and are quite transparent.
I’m familiar with the articles about the Vatican Bank. In the CNS article, they state that they are going to be publishing annual reports starting in October and that the new head of the bank hasn’t detected any wrongdoing.Joe, I don’t think we’re talking individual churches, Dioceses or even The Vatican but there is no doubt about the secrecy and questionable practices regarding the Vatican Bank.
nytimes.com/2013/05/31/world/europe/vatican-bank-looks-to-shed-its-image-as-an-offshore-haven.html?_r=0
foxnews.com/world/2013/05/31/vatican-bank-chief-havent-rendered-good-service-to-holy-father/
catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1302393.htm
If your not convinced by these, just Google Vatican Bank and you’ll find page after page…
The Vatican Bank is an entity separate from the Church; it is the work of man and subject to error.I am referring to the Vatican Bank.
Well, there is are a couple of problems with this. First of all, you have compared the Vatican Bank, not even the Holy See itself, with Protestant churches. Protestant churches, for the most part, operate on a local level only. So to compare apples and oranges, you should be comparing the Protestant churches with the Catholic Parishes and Dioceses. In this case, you will likely find the Catholic parishes and dioceses more transparent than their protestant counterparts.I am referring to the Vatican Bank.
If they are going to start releasing public financial statements, then that’s great. I was just wondering why they were so secretive for all this time, but if they are reforming things then that’s good. The link you provided however leads to the ‘new reply’ page for this thread, haha.Well, there is are a couple of problems with this. First of all, you have compared the Vatican Bank, not even the Holy See itself, with Protestant churches. Protestant churches, for the most part, operate on a local level only. So to compare apples and oranges, you should be comparing the Protestant churches with the Catholic Parishes and Dioceses. In this case, you will likely find the Catholic parishes and dioceses more transparent than their protestant counterparts.
The second problem is that, taken as a whole, the finances of the Holy See and the Vatican bank are a extremely small part of the Catholic Church finances; as the vast majority of the work of the Church (and hence the money involved operating the Church) is at the local level, ie parishes and dioceses. So to really judge how transparent the Church is, one should focus on the parishes and diocese.
The third problem, is that you are ignoring the financial reports that the Holy See makes every year, here is the press briefing for 2001 (2012 is due out in July) news.va/en/news/holy-see-financial-statements-for-2011
The fourth problem is that you are ignoring the fact that the Vatican Bank will start releasing public financial statements this year. forums.catholic-questions.org/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=10829754
How has the Church used its assets to topple marxism exactly?In my lifetime the Church was involved in toppling marxism from eastern europe and it spread into Russia. It has fought evil on many fronts.
Do you think if you let evil know how you are positioning your assets you might be giving away your hand ? Thats why evil wants to know what the Church is doing with its money.
I am just wondering why you are so fixated on the Vatican Bank, when you started the thread saying explicitly it was not about monetary wealth, “Now I’m not speaking about pure monetary wealth. I’m speaking about the grandeur of the buildings themselves and all the wealth that is evident within Vatican City.” Not withstanding the change in position, why the fixation on the Vatican Bank. It is admittedly, not a strong point of the Church when it comes to financial management and transparency, but it truly one of the few weak points. Is it that it is the only think you can find to be critical of when it comes to the wealth of the Church?If they are going to start releasing public financial statements, then that’s great. I was just wondering why they were so secretive for all this time, but if they are reforming things then that’s good. The link you provided however leads to the ‘new reply’ page for this thread, haha.
Through clandestine support of the Polish Solidarity movement. Through the trips of JP II to Poland in the late 70s and 80s. These were certainly not cheap trips, if you study them all, you will have to come to the conclusion that they cost a great deal of money. June 2-9th, 1979: 8 days that changed the world.How has the Church used its assets to topple marxism exactly?
The church already puts ppl first. Besides you always want to look your best for God, whether is by the way you dress and by the churches that we have. If you remember, the ark of the covenant was made of the purest gold, yes it’s true god would be present in the ark, but don’t you think that somebody probably said, why so much gold?
Even in kings I believe, it speaks about how magnificent the temples were.
My question changed, because my original question about the grandeur of the buildings etc. was answered, and answered well at that. Sorry that I didn’t clarify that.I am just wondering why you are so fixated on the Vatican Bank, when you started the thread saying explicitly it was not about monetary wealth, “Now I’m not speaking about pure monetary wealth. I’m speaking about the grandeur of the buildings themselves and all the wealth that is evident within Vatican City.” Not withstanding the change in position, why the fixation on the Vatican Bank. It is admittedly, not a strong point of the Church when it comes to financial management and transparency, but it truly one of the few weak points. Is it that it is the only think you can find to be critical of when it comes to the wealth of the Church?
I am sorry about the bad link provided. Here is the correct one economywatch.com/in-the-news/vatican-bank-to-begin-publishing-annual-financial-reports.17-05.html .
So the Vatican Bank is the only way you can be critical of the Church with regards to its wealth? That is fair, but then why the comparisons to Protestant churches?My question changed, because my original question about the grandeur of the buildings etc. was answered, and answered well at that. Sorry that I didn’t clarify that.
Technically speaking, you are right. It owes us no transparency, legally or morally, beyond the moral obligation to avoid scandal. And this is a true moral obligation on all of us, and Church institutions. If the only way to avoid the scandal is to be financially transparent to some degree, it must do so.I’m not persuaded that the Vatican bank owes any of us an accounting. It’s a Church institution. It’s not listed on the NYSE. It’s not preparing to “go public”. If it needs some kind of reform, then it’s up to the Pope to see that it gets done. It’s not up to me, and certainly not up to those who like to critique it for “lack of transparency”.
But don’t you think people who don’t like the Church will consider it scandalous no matter what it discloses? If it was the best run institution on earth, invested in nothing but “safe harbor” accounts, critics of the Church will simply say (witness the cause of this thread) it should give it all away. If it takes any risks, critics will say it’s crazily risking the contributions of the faithful.Technically speaking, you are right. It owes us no transparency, legally or morally, beyond the moral obligation to avoid scandal. And this is a true moral obligation on all of us, and Church institutions. If the only way to avoid the scandal is to be financially transparent to some degree, it must do so.
The Vatican Bank is not a true church institution in that it is not owned by the church but rather is affiliated with it.I’m not persuaded that the Vatican bank owes any of us an accounting. It’s a Church institution. It’s not listed on the NYSE. It’s not preparing to “go public”. If it needs some kind of reform, then it’s up to the Pope to see that it gets done. It’s not up to me, and certainly not up to those who like to critique it for “lack of transparency”.
It’s not listed on the NYSE because it uses the church to maintain it’s non profit status and while all profits are fed back to the church, the legality of obtaining some of those profits is questionable. Over the years, it’s been accused of money laundering for several mobsFounded by Pope Pius XII in June 1942, its assets are not considered property of the Holy See, nor it is overseen by the Prefecture for the Economic Affairs of the Holy See,[2] and it is listed in the Annuario Pontificio not under “Holy See” or “Vatican City State”, but after the pages on religious institutes,[3] and cultural institutes,[4] and placed with charitable foundations[5][6]
Pope Benedict started the clean up by removing Tedeshi as head and appointing von Frieberg just before stepping down. As a private banking institution it should not be exempt from accepted accounting procedures to maintain it’s tax exempt status…more here.The Institute for the Works of Religion has been often accused of funding the Solidarity Polish trade-union as well as the Contras, managing US covert funds.[25]
So, it is true that there is a Vatican Bank underneath St. Peter’s Basilica? Like in the movie “Angels & Demons”. It showed a vast labyrinth of rooms that houses the Church’s assets like the bank and artwork, etc…The Vatican Bank is not a true church institution in that it is not owned by the church but rather is affiliated with it.
It’s not listed on the NYSE because it uses the church to maintain it’s non profit status and while all profits are fed back to the church, the legality of obtaining some of those profits is questionable. Over the years, it’s been accused of money laundering for several mobs
Pope Benedict started the clean up by removing Tedeshi as head and appointing von Frieberg just before stepping down. As a private banking institution it should not be exempt from accepted accounting procedures to maintain it’s tax exempt status…more here.
forums.catholic-questions.org/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=10830388
The Church and its institutions are always going to be criticized by some, condemned by others, no matter what.The Vatican Bank is not a true church institution in that it is not owned by the church but rather is affiliated with it.
It’s not listed on the NYSE because it uses the church to maintain it’s non profit status and while all profits are fed back to the church, the legality of obtaining some of those profits is questionable. Over the years, it’s been accused of money laundering for several mobs
Pope Benedict started the clean up by removing Tedeshi as head and appointing von Frieberg just before stepping down. As a private banking institution it should not be exempt from accepted accounting procedures to maintain it’s tax exempt status…more here.
forums.catholic-questions.org/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=10830388