C
Cody
Guest
I was curious to know what some of you guys thought about this:
aloha.net/~mikesch/peters-jerusalem-tomb.htm
aloha.net/~mikesch/peters-jerusalem-tomb.htm
I skimmed bits of it, and I was unable to read more than a few sentences before his shoddy scholarship shone through. For example:I was curious to know what some of you guys thought about this…
Umm, scuse me??? The Catholic Church says no such thing!The Catholic Church says that Peter was Pope in Rome from 41 to 66 A.D.
Um, no he doesn’t.Eusebius, one of the most learned men of his time, wrote the Church history up to the year 325 A.D. He said that Peter never was in Rome.
The accusations didn’t exist at that point, to my knowledge. The Vatican was still at the height of being praised from all quarters as being instrumental to the survival of hundreds of thousands of people.And, of course, the author couldn’t help but include the old accusations that the Church supported the Nazis (these accusations have been thoroughly disproven, but maybe not back in 1953 when this was apparently written).
Agreed. I think the author went to Loraine Boetner University and had Jack Chick for an instructor. The scholarship seems on-par with that sort of bottom-feeding ilk.I have doubts about this website down to the very core of my being.
I subscribed for many years to a magazine, Biblical Archaeology Review (BAR), which was very good in many respects.As an aside, is anyone aware of any good websites containing archaeological evidence for the Christian faith?