E
Elizabeth779
Guest
Is there a list available of Catholic music that can be played during a wedding?
I suggest the Propers of the Mass along with any traditional offertory and communion motets. Nice, theocentric hymns, or perhaps Marian hymns, can be sung at the procession and recession. Or, alternatively, instrumentals (such as organ music) can accompany the procession and recession. I find organ pieces to be particularly popular for wedding processions.
For our daughters wedding we hired the vocalist (who is also our music director) and organist who celebrate Mass with us each Sunday. That pretty much tool care of that.Is there a list available of Catholic music that can be played during a wedding?
In many parishes on ly the parish organist is allowed th play the organ for weddings, funerals, and special events.For our daughters wedding we hired the vocalist (who is also our music director) and organist who celebrate Mass with us each Sunday. That pretty much tool care of that.
DGB
ALL parishes are supposed to forbid all of the aforementioned. I would add Canon in D to the list of banned wedding music.Your best bet is to inquire from the parish where you are being asked to play. Some parishes forbid the playing of any secular music, including the traditional Wagner processional and Mendelssohn recessional; some are not so strict.
I understand the logic of the original pieces being nixed (not sure whether or not I agree with it)…but whats the logic behind the ban on Canon?ALL parishes are supposed to forbid all of the aforementioned. I would add Canon in D to the list of banned wedding music.
I’m pretty sure Canon in D is not banned.I understand the logic of the original pieces being nixed (not sure whether or not I agree with it)…but whats the logic behind the ban on Canon?![]()
From what I understand, it isn’t because it is considered “absolute music” - having no secular or sacred connotation. The reason why the Wagner, Mendelssohn and other works associated with works like musicals, operas, ballets, etc. is because they have a secular connotation by nature of being associated with the above. If, for instance, the Mendelssohn was written just as an organ piece to be played as a postlude and not as the ending for his ballet, it would have fallen under the “absolute music” category.I’m pretty sure Canon in D is not banned.
You can see what is permitted at your parish, but I can also give you a list of what most of the parishes I’ve worked in have used. I used to work at a cathedral who were very strict about following everything in terms of music to a “t”, so if I can find that sheet (from my wedding), I’ll send that over to you as well.Is there a list available of Catholic music that can be played during a wedding?
I agree with you in regards to the above, although it can take years. Polyphony, for instance, was a secular style of music before it was refined and rendered appropriate for liturgy. The processional from “The Sound of Music”, I agree, is one of those things where people have given the green light to, but, having done Catholic weddings in 100+ parishes, numerous dioceses and in 8 different states, more often than not, even that is not permitted because it came from a musical and is still associated with the musical.There is considerable grey area. One frequently-used example is the processional from The Sound of Music. Other movies also have composed wedding marches. And some secular or even pagan things, its worth pointing out, have been absorbed as appropriate for the Church.
This is actually the issue I take with the ban on the above-mentioned works. Yes, they started as opera works. And Christmas trees started as a pagan practice. If one can be absorbed as appropriate for Christianity, why not the other?
What is appropriate and what is allowed do not always correlate 100%. It’s up to the bishop or to the pastor to determine what is allowed; if one allows something inappropriate and the other doesn’t, which side would you rather be on?When I married a few years ago, I was gently but firmly told that an instrumental version of a beautiful secular love song was not appropriate for the processional of my Catholic wedding. I acquiesced without argument. Recently I went to a Catholic wedding in another parish and was bewildered to hear “With Your Love” by Journey as the processional. If there are traditions that aren’t really rules, they shouldn’t, in my opinion, be presented as rules. While my wedding was beautiful and my marriage is a blessings and while I wish this other couple blessings as well, I couldn’t help feeling like a chump as I sat in that pew and listened to “With Your Love.”![]()
First, the pastor of the church has the right to lay down rules that might be more restrictive than what is universally applicable, and in many cases these questions involve judgments of quality and taste, so “the rules” are not going to be identical throughout the world. Second, in this case, your priest was (mostly) right: completely secular music is not appropriate for the liturgy. I say “mostly” because some instrumental music – Handel’s Water Music or a Bach prelude, for example – is secular in the sense that it is not religious, but under almost anybody’s definition would be appropriate as an instrumental processional. Appropriate music should not invoke strictly secular or worldly associations as a pop song would.When I married a few years ago, I was gently but firmly told that an instrumental version of a beautiful secular love song was not appropriate for the processional of my Catholic wedding. I acquiesced without argument. Recently I went to a Catholic wedding in another parish and was bewildered to hear “With Your Love” by Journey as the processional. If there are traditions that aren’t really rules, they shouldn’t, in my opinion, be presented as rules. While my wedding was beautiful and my marriage is a blessings and while I wish this other couple blessings as well, I couldn’t help feeling like a chump as I sat in that pew and listened to “With Your Love.”![]()
Well, I’d rather be on the side where I’m not played for a fool and made a chump of? Which side is that?which side would you rather be on?