A
ajpirc
Guest
As the Mass changed after Vatican II, was the way that the Sacraments were celebrated changed also?
What should be entered into the box?Yes, to varying degrees. A quick google will assist in identifying the changes.
Could someone help me identify these changes, such as giving me a website? I couldn’t really find anything when I Googled it.Yes, to varying degrees. A quick google will assist in identifying the changes.
Is there a specific website to click on?google rite for baptism roman catholic
for instance
Holy Orders: The Holy Orders rite hasn’t changed much. The Old Rite’s text says (the parts that were taken out I put in italics):
"Grant, we beseech You, Almighty Father, to these Your servants, the dignity of the
Priesthood; renew the spirit of holiness within them, so that they
may hold from You, O God, the office of the second rank in Your service and by the
example of their behavior afford a pattern of holy living.
The New Rite (promulgated in 1968), says:
“Grant, we beseech You, Almighty Father, to these Your servants, the dignity of the
Priesthood; renew within them the spirit of holiness. May they hold from You, the office
of the second rank in Your service and by the example of their behavior afford a pattern
of holy living.”
The sacrament is conferred by the above prayer - sacraments cannot be conferred with gestures only. The reason it can be held as valid is that oldest manuscripts also omit the “ut” so if that is invalid, then it doesn’t matter even if an “ut” was added later – the whole generations of clerical priestly ordinations were invalid.I’ve heard it stated that because “so that” was eliminated, the new rite is invalid. However, the sacrament is conferred by the laying on of hands, not by the above prayer.
Thank you for correcting me.The sacrament is conferred by the above prayer - sacraments cannot be conferred with gestures only. The reason it can be held as valid is that oldest manuscripts also omit the “ut” so if that is invalid, then it doesn’t matter even if an “ut” was added later – the whole generations of clerical priestly ordinations were invalid.
Also, the old rite of Confirmation included a slap on the cheek.Confirmation: In the old rite of confirmation, the priest or bishop anoints the person about to be confirmed and says in Latin “I sign you with the Sign of the Cross, and I confirm you with the chrism of salvation. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.” In the new rite (promulgated in 1971), the priest or bishop anoints the person about to be confirmed saying “N, receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”
My dad said he remembers that!Also, the old rite of Confirmation included a slap on the cheek.
When I was confirmed as an Anglican in 1962 the bishop “slapped” us, more like a pat, on the cheek. I know there were some RC Bishops also still doing that gesture at that time, no longer included. The sign for “confirmation” in American Sign Language is that gesture.Confirmation: In the old rite of confirmation, the priest or bishop anoints the person about to be confirmed and says in Latin “I sign you with the Sign of the Cross, and I confirm you with the chrism of salvation. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.” In the new rite (promulgated in 1971), the priest or bishop anoints the person about to be confirmed saying “N, receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”
The sign for “confirmation” in American Sign Language is that gesture.![]()