Western Civilization and Protestants

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffalo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow! Rude replys, ad hominem attacks, snide comments and a guilt trip too. Keep going you’re on a roll. Please teach my how to represent the Faith, you do it so well! 👍
Jimmy, he wasn’t trying to be mean about Michael Voris, he’s just being glib.
 
Wow! Rude replys, ad hominem attacks, snide comments and a guilt trip too. Keep going you’re on a roll. Please teach me how to represent the Faith, you do it so well! 👍
All I know is that I joked about the guy’s hairpiece and his odd TV background set and you go all postal to pieces about how I’ve bashed the man. I fail to understand where I’ve put a guilt trip on you at all. And prior to that post about Voris I wasn’t talking to you, period. I don’t need your character analysis nor do I give a rip about what you think about me. You’ve memorized a few terms on CAF that you read from posters like ad hominem and probably don’t know what it means. And what you take for rude might be sarcasm or joking. In any case, Michael Voris has a great apologist in ya, Jam.

Go back and look at the “rude jerk” comment and see who struck first, smart mouth.
 
Well all I know is that I turned on EWTN on my cable and lo and behold **your boy **was on there preachin’ the good news
Lighten up! do you really think I was “BASHING” the guy? You must have really thin skin to think that was bashing! You’ve never been in a real fight or argument have you? lol :D:D;)
What a sweet, charitable post, jam. Honestly, it got me teared up. First you respond with how cool it is that EWTN has **your buddy Voris **then you follow up with I’m a rude jerk. How mature. How old ru may I ask? You sound in your teens…Thanks for the warm thoughts and I know I’m in your prayers. 😉You represent your faith well (uhg-hem) and I’m sure it’ll bring many souls to Christ. :rolleyes
he’s just being glib.
Feel the love!!
What a series of sweet, charitable posts by my gurney.
 
What a sweet, charitable post, jam. Honestly, it got me teared up. First you respond with how cool it is that EWTN has your buddy Voris then you follow up with I’m a rude jerk. How mature. How old ru may I ask? You sound in your teens…Thanks for the warm thoughts and I know I’m in your prayers. ;)You represent your faith well (uhg-hem) and I’m sure it’ll bring many souls to Christ. :rolleyes: I’ll cherish that rude jerk comment always as a token of our friendship 😉 JUST SAYIN’…
I appreciate the common sense, Jimbo obviously lacks it.
OH! And on it goes.
 
Please look into my posting history Gurney, I’m not antiAmerican at all, I have a love for your country, but on an aside, do you understand how it feels for me to hear so many bad things being said about the Catholic Church. especially when a lot of it is based on lies and/or misconceptions?
My points are not about Catholic theology but historical interactions with nation-states, law courts, politics, and other intrigues. You don’t hear me here bashing John Paul II or Benedict or the catechism or purgatory, Mary, the Eucharist, etc. I wouldn’t do that. I simply have a different view from yours about the Church with relation to historical interactions politically, etc. I don’t see it from your vantage point. And I am not basing anything on lies. I can see how you might see my perception as misconception, but not lies. Your posts usually point out the sins of America and I’ve never heard you say one good thing about it. So my perception is a negative one as to your view of us. I’ve heard you take several shots at the U.S. in the past.

At least we can both agree on Def Leppard I suppose…
 
Gurney you’re being mean now, and Jimmy’s a good guy, but he like everyone else can get frustrated.
Well I’m not sure I appreciated being called glib. Now I’m mean. Seeing as how “glib” means insincere, nasty, quasi-deceitful speech that lacks substance and preparation, I think I’ll take your “mean” monicker.

Jimmy called me a rude jerk. You do the math, Josie. Do “rude” and “jerk” aid in your love and enjoyment of reading someone’s posts?

I simply joked with Jimmy boy about Michael Voris and he got his underwear in a twist and went on to make nasty personal comments. I didn’t start it, period. So, you may think he’s Mr. Nice Guy; I have a different take at this point. And I fail to see why he is “frustrated.” I completely and totally disagree with all of your posts in here so far but never have I felt you to be a jerk or an idiot or a moron. I simply see things differently from you. I detest anti-American talk, true, but I don’t think you’re a jerk. I’m as frustrated in these arguments as Jimmy so if I can restrain from busting out the jerk gun from my holster, so can he…:mad:
 
My points are not about Catholic theology but historical interactions with nation-states, law courts, politics, and other intrigues. You don’t hear me here bashing John Paul II or Benedict or the catechism or purgatory, Mary, the Eucharist, etc. I wouldn’t do that. I simply have a different view from yours about the Church with relation to historical interactions politically, etc. I don’t see it from your vantage point. And I am not basing anything on lies. I can see how you might see my perception as misconception, but not lies. Your posts usually point out the sins of America and I’ve never heard you say one good thing about it. So my perception is a negative one as to your view of us. I’ve heard you take several shots at the U.S. in the past.

At least we can both agree on Def Leppard I suppose…
Gurney, I know you’re points are not about Catholic theology (although you and I have scrapped it out in the past over the papacy), but when I refer to lies and misconceptions I refer to historical revisionism and or lies. And I know that you have a different view but I’m not angry at you for having it, I’m trying to show you through arguments that your view is somewhat flawed or at least I believe it to be. I have not taken shots at the U.S. unless I was trying to prove a point to someone (and that was not often, in fact, I reiterate I have posted much that is good, so don’t judge me by a few posts).
 
Well I’m not sure I appreciated being called glib. Now I’m mean. Seeing as how “glib” means insincere, nasty, quasi-deceitful speech that lacks substance and preparation, I think I’ll take your “mean” monicker.

Jimmy called me a rude jerk. You do the math, Josie. Do “rude” and “jerk” aid in your love and enjoyment of reading someone’s posts?

I simply joked with Jimmy boy about Michael Voris and he got his underwear in a twist and went on to make nasty personal comments. I didn’t start it, period. So, you may think he’s Mr. Nice Guy; I have a different take at this point. And I fail to see why he is “frustrated.” I completely and totally disagree with all of your posts in here so far but never have I felt you to be a jerk or an idiot or a moron. I simply see things differently from you. I detest anti-American talk, true, but I don’t think you’re a jerk. I’m as frustrated in these arguments as Jimmy so if I can restrain from busting out the jerk gun from my holster, so can he…:mad:
By glib I meant you were not serious about your remarks, and he is a good guy who said something he shouldn’t have but you’re not acting Christian either. And even if you disagree with my points you have pointed out that it’s always a pleasure to talk to me and that I have raised some good points. It’s nice talking history with you even if we don’t see eye to eye.
 
Gurney, I know you’re points are not about Catholic theology (although you and I have scrapped it out in the past over the papacy), but when I refer to lies and misconceptions I refer to historical revisionism and or lies. And I know that you have a different view but I’m not angry at you for having it, I’m trying to show you through arguments that your view is somewhat flawed or at least I believe it to be. I have not taken shots at the U.S. unless I was trying to prove a point to someone (at that was not often, in fact, I reiterate I have posted much that is good, so don’t judge me by a few posts.
I’m not judging you so no worries. I’m not thrilled about being called glib, though, I must say. I don’t believe my arguments are flawed at all here. Honestly don’t. I think you are reading history through purely Catholic prejudice and you’ll make the pieces fit in the puzzle even if you have to cut the puzzle with a Husqvarna chainsaw with two blades on it. I think a little self-deprecating honesty with history adds humility to the Church and brings it dignity. Pope John Paul II caught hell from hardcore Catholics for his apologies to the Jews and Orthodox. I’m sure many Catholics in here were thinking, “what’s there to apologize for!?” and probably still do…I’m aware of the flaws in Protestant history for they are legion. But I’m also aware of its triumphs and strengths. And while I think the papacy has been right on MANY occasions, I still do not think it to be infallible and perfect and universally meant to be supreme over all other bishops. I disagree with several Church teachings and as a result have not been going to the Catholic Church lately. I’m not a hypocrite and will be honest with my disagreements, struggles, and divergence with the Church on several issues. I’m at the point where CAF is becoming more tedious and full of insults and take-no-prisoners apologetics rather than welcoming, thoughtful, intelligent dialogue. I’m weary of it and it is honestly the protestants in here that keep me around. The Anglicans are mostly my friends here and the Orthodox. The jury’s out…
 
I’m not judging you so no worries. I’m not thrilled about being called glib, though, I must say. I don’t believe my arguments are flawed at all here. Honestly don’t. I think you are reading history through purely Catholic prejudice and you’ll make the pieces fit in the puzzle even if you have to cut the puzzle with a Husqvarna chainsaw with two blades on it. I think a little self-deprecating honesty with history adds humility to the Church and brings it dignity. Pope John Paul II caught hell from hardcore Catholics for his apologies to the Jews and Orthodox. I’m sure many Catholics in here were thinking, “what’s there to apologize for!?” and probably still do…I’m aware of the flaws in Protestant history for they are legion. But I’m also aware of its triumphs and strengths. And while I think the papacy has been right on MANY occasions, I still do not think it to be infallible and perfect and universally meant to be supreme over all other bishops. I disagree with several Church teachings and as a result have not been going to the Catholic Church lately. I’m not a hypocrite and will be honest with my disagreements, struggles, and divergence with the Church on several issues. I’m at the point where CAF is becoming more tedious and full of insults and take-no-prisoners apologetics rather than welcoming, thoughtful, intelligent dialogue. I’m weary of it and it is honestly the protestants in here that keep me around. The Anglicans are mostly my friends here and the Orthodox. The jury’s out…
Well Gurney, I have met some very nice people here at CAF, but of course, there are always those few who you wish you could whack a shoe at, but when insults are thrown my way I try to rebuff or use a God bless to divert my anger. I also realize you think I have a prejudiced view when it comes to history but my point on this thread was not to chalk up the evils of Protestantism but that I don’t see eye to eye with regard to your belief that Protestantism or the Reformation brought about religious freedoms, and the only way I could that was to show you examples of why I don’t believe that.

p.s. I’ll be praying for you.
 
That is Michael Voris. He is doesn’t tone down. He have a very negative view of Protestantism, so do I.
That’s ignorance shining its brightest right there. You cannot expect anyone to take you seriously man.😦
 
Gurney you’re being mean now, and Jimmy’s a good guy, but he like everyone else can get frustrated.
I’ve been frustrated to say the least with all of the wrongful shots taken at Protestants as a whole here with not the least bit of justifiability. Gurney offers a very logical and reasonable look at just about any subject he responds to. Isn’t it beyond obvious that he is 100% correct in stating that the Catholic church didn’t single-handedly build Western Civilization? I mean come on here, it’s as if Catholics just will not concede anything here because they feel that it is outside of their Holy realm to do so. This has gotten beyond ridiculous.
 
I don’t see eye to eye with regard to your belief that Protestantism or the Reformation brought about religious freedoms, and the only way I could that was to show you examples of why I don’t believe that.

p.s. I’ll be praying for you.
I appreciate the prayers, Josie. I’ll do the same for you. My beef isn’t with Catholicism obviously. My beef is with excessive apologetics. I see it not only among Catholics here who have this full-on mega apologetics machine gun switched on in every discussion. The Catholic Church, in all fairness, went through a period especially after Vatican II, where it went undefended. Catechesis was appaulingly BAD when I was a kid. So bad, in fact, that I didn’t even know the Eucharist was the Body and Blood of Christ until someone told me in high school! Everything I learned about Catholicism was through books, countless hours of reading, and through personal studies of history. Nothing I learned about the Catholic Church came from the Catholic Church! It all came from me. So, through the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s and some of the 90’s, Catholics were very poorly-schooled in their faith and they just took attack after attack. They sat idly by while people accused them of worshipping Mary and praying to statues and that purgatory is a “third option” as well as that Catholics are cannibals, you name it. The Church got attacked a lot and people were ill-equipped and ignorant to defend her. With the dawn of EWTN, Catholic Answers, Ignatius Press and a host of Catholic Media and new apologetics coupled with enthusiastic, intellectual folks like Karl Keating and company, that’s no longer a problem.

In fact, it’s almost the opposite. Now Catholics are so militant at times that it’s almost impossible for them to be “non-partisan” and objective when they look at the Church. They’re LOCKED in apologetics mode 24/7 and can’t look at the history of the Church with impartial appraisals or critique. There is always a reason for everything no matter how dastardly or bad. And if the Church did something nasty and absurd, then the apologetics approach is to demonize Protestants to deflect from RCC culpability in the area in question.

I notice this in politics on both sides of the aisle. Sarah Palin will sit there and bash the Dixie Chicks for DARING to criticize George W. Bush on foreign soil. The GOP crowd slammed Clinton for protesting his country’s Vietnam policies in England when he was a young man. But when Sarah Palin went to Hong Kong and ripped Obama to shreads in front of a bunch of foreigners, it was ok.

When some folks wanted to pull us out of Iraq they were branded “cut and run” cowards. When Sarah Palin quit, and I emphasize quit, her job and failed the people of Alaska, it wasn’t quitting in the GOP apologetics outlook, she was making better use of her time and trying to evade nasty lawsuits.

Democrats are no better. They’re always locked in apologetics mode as well. Their guys can do no wrong in their eyes and they defend anything and everything a fellow liberal does. They’ll rip on Republicans for being a party of deregulation while Barney Frank was the chief architect for the Dems of the deregulation of the housing industry that single-handedly brought down our nation’s lenders in one fell swoop?

Guys like Glen Beck trash, bash, and mock people on the left every day and yet when someone lampoons them, it’s heresy and a personal attack!! Limbaugh has said the most hideous things throughout the years and yet when someone dares to chide him, they are ‘relentless attack-dogs’ out to get him.

Everyone is an apologist nowdays. It drives me nuts. Planned Parenthood are apologists for the inhuman crime of our times, abortion. They get schooled and brainwashed as to how to defend any argument against abortion. Liberals are taught to be apologists for race and make racial accusations against anyone and everyone. Conservatives are apologists for the insurance companies, the NRA, the military industrial complex, and the wealthy. Labor unions are taught to be apologists, anti-union conservatives that hate labor are taught the reverse apologetics.

I just tire of it all and wish we could call a spade a spade. I’m tired of people defending what the Vatican did to Galileo or justifying assassinations against monarchs, just as I’m tired of Protestants making up absurd things about popes in cahoots with Hitler. Silly.

I like to look at history for what it was and how it impacts us today. I can say with total honesty that if it weren’t for the Catholic Church Europe wouldn’t have been Christianized, the people of Rome would’ve been utterly doomed without the papacy’s alliances and Christianizing the pagan conquerers. I can also say that without the RCC the great works of antiquity from A to Z would likely have died a quick death. The Church brought order out of chaos and civilization to an insane period of time after the fall of Old Rome. I can also say that without John Paul II’s constant, brave, determined attacks on communism along with Reagan, the Iron Curtain and Soviet Union might still be with us today. I can go on and on about Catholic achievements for they are many.

But I refuse to diminish the bravery of Martin Luther in standing up for his ideals and feeling held captive to the Word of God and his conscience. In the Catholic world at that time your conscience meant nothing. The Church did your thinking and if you were out of line with the Vatican, you were burned. That simple. Or the Church tricked guys like Jan Huss and offered him safe passage and then executed him. But I can also criticize Calvin and his boys for intolerance in the other direction, being overly-reactionary and causing great harm to so many.

I don’t get bothered by mentioning Catholic achievements and positives so much as I get mad about omissions. And Catholis should know that sins omission are not healthy! Making an argument that the Catholic Church single-handedly created Western Civilization isn’t only boloney, it’s corney and anyone worth powder would realize how insane the whole argument is. Forget the Greeks, forget democracy existed in Athens and inspired the Americans to re-animate it, forget the Roman Republic and it’s senate and assembly that inspired the bicameral system of England and thus the U.S. Forget Reformation that encouraged more individualism and personal freedom of conscience. Forget Washington, Lincoln, Martin Luther King, DeCarte, Shakespeare, C.S. Lewis, and a zilliion other non-Catholics that paved the way for the West to be what it is today…omission after omission…plugging one’s ears and just saying that it was all thanks to the Roman Catholic Church…

I just can’t buy the argument…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top