M
Metatron
Guest
I have always thought that Reason and Faith must go hand in hand.
I could never, ever accept anything on the ground of “blind faith”, because then which faith to choose? When you’re blind, everything is equally black.
I believe in Reason, and I think that the Word/Reason (Logos) is with Christ, not with atheism.
I was raised a Catholic, I’m baptized as Catholic. - I’m from Europe in a country that’s almost exclusively Catholic (the rest being atheist). -
During the years of reading (mostly German theologians and philosophers on the matter) and thinking, contemplating, I created to my own vision of Christianity.
Now, “my own” isn’t a claim for authorship. It’s just a collage of things I read from various Christian philosophers. Also I dislike the tone of my own post: “MY interpretation” - as if I’m so incredibly intelligent as to be the one who decides about how Christianity is to be interpreted.
While I really want to be humble and I detest arrogance, I, at the same time, cannot do but to use the only God-given tool I have: Reason. It is for me the ultimate authority, because - what if the pope decides to deviate from the Word of God, what do you do then? (As it was the case during the 10th century for instance?) - There’s no other guarantee but Reason.
So, - my beliefs are as follows:
My question is: what am I? Am I still a Catholic? What’s your advice to me? Should I reconsider my positions or just define myself as something else? And what am I? Just general Christian? Does a different church describe me?
Thank you all in advance! Godspeed.
I could never, ever accept anything on the ground of “blind faith”, because then which faith to choose? When you’re blind, everything is equally black.
I believe in Reason, and I think that the Word/Reason (Logos) is with Christ, not with atheism.
I was raised a Catholic, I’m baptized as Catholic. - I’m from Europe in a country that’s almost exclusively Catholic (the rest being atheist). -
During the years of reading (mostly German theologians and philosophers on the matter) and thinking, contemplating, I created to my own vision of Christianity.
Now, “my own” isn’t a claim for authorship. It’s just a collage of things I read from various Christian philosophers. Also I dislike the tone of my own post: “MY interpretation” - as if I’m so incredibly intelligent as to be the one who decides about how Christianity is to be interpreted.
While I really want to be humble and I detest arrogance, I, at the same time, cannot do but to use the only God-given tool I have: Reason. It is for me the ultimate authority, because - what if the pope decides to deviate from the Word of God, what do you do then? (As it was the case during the 10th century for instance?) - There’s no other guarantee but Reason.
So, - my beliefs are as follows:
- I believe in the Trinity: God/Son/Holy Ghost as one single Essence of a single Godhead.
- I believe that Jesus Christ was both the Son of God and God (follows).
- I believe that God himself died on the cross, not “his son” or “his avatar” - Christ to me isn’t some “half-god” figure separated from the Lord. He is Lord. Christ is my God, both are the same Essence. It follows, therefore, that God himself died.
- “Why hast thou forsaken me” is the highest affirmation of the truth of Christ’s divinity. It completes it, because by absolute estrangement from his own Essence, God finally became human (even with our own doubts; as if for a second “God himself became an atheist”).
- Christ, the LORD, died on the cross.
- His death was real.
- His death also means the beginning of something new. What survives isn’t Christ or God, but the Holy Spirit (which is the same Essence as God; it’s a matter of sequence, of Events of the same Being). I understand the Holy Spirit to mean Humanity, Love, the Community of Christians.
- “Heaven and Hell” aren’t “places” like Europe or America or Venus or Mars.
- I cannot subscribe to the “good people go to Heaven, bad people go to Hell” story.
- If anyone does anything to be rewarded in the afterlife, that absolutely nullifies the ethical action in my opinion. You must do good because it’s good. No reason for doing it, no reward expected. Therefore, “good deeds” for “rewards” is absolutely unacceptable.
- I cannot think of the communion other than symbolic. Nothing happens except a symbolic gesture. There’s nothing “holy” about anything material. Holy water is just water.
- It’s a matter of indifference to me whether Mary was a Virgin or not.
- I believe that the most important thing in the Bible is the Ethical Code of Jesus and the Passion of the Christ: the infinitely profound paradox that the Divine Being would share our own fate and die.
- The profound paradox that the Divine Being, Lord of the Universe, is identical to a carpenter from Nazareth who was born in a stable. This fascinates me and I find the greatest inner truth in this fact.
- I believe that Jesus is not merely a high ethical metaphor (like Antigone), but also historically true.
- I do not read the Bible literally and I take many of it as allegory and metaphor, yet of course not all of it.
- I believe Christianity and Science go hand in hand (Newton after all wrote more on theology than he did on physics! And Descartes?! Father of modern science, devout Christian!)
- Praying doesn’t change the course of events of anything, ever. - Praying for your own benefits is also a sin, I believe. - Praying to me means “tuning your own Will to Divine Will”; therefore, tuning yourself to Providence. - And not asking God for favors!
- In this sense “emptying” your own self is important; the less we are, the more God is. - “Kenosis” I think it’s called. We need to empty ourselves.
- Philosophy is the way that can lead us to Faith. It’s able to lift us from common sense to higher religious truths.
- …
My question is: what am I? Am I still a Catholic? What’s your advice to me? Should I reconsider my positions or just define myself as something else? And what am I? Just general Christian? Does a different church describe me?
Thank you all in advance! Godspeed.