What Americans thought of Jewish refugees on the eve of World War II

  • Thread starter Thread starter steido01
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Zoltan_Cobalt said:
Children…just as bad…:mad:

pbs.org/newshour/bb/how-the-islamic-state-indoctrinates-afghan-children/

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was ten-years-old when he was admitted to the US as a refugee. I wonder if he saw any videos. I wonder where he learned jihad. I wonder where he learned terrorist activity. You think his mother might have taught him? Think she might have shown him videos? On was he inspired by ISIS? Was he inspired by Al-Qaeda? Or was he mad that we started Guantanamo or mad that we had photos taken at Abu Ghraib?
Click to expand...
Dude you are completely out of control.
Your remarks are not only unCatholic (as per your moniker) they are unchristian as well.
I suggest you turn off the computer and pick up the Rosary.
 
Terrorism = Terrorism

They were a refugee family that should not have been in this country. Americans would be alive today if it were not for that family.
Guatanamo is a running sore that needs to be closed down, it’s a disgrace to your nation and betrays it’s best ideals.
Click to expand...
I agree. Guantanamo became a political football and was never run properly. I would venture an educated guess that if speedy MILITARY trials were conducted and Guantanamo had a gallows there would be considerably less terrorism aimed at Americans and American interests.
 
I agree. Guantanamo became a political football and was never run properly. I would venture an educated guess that if speedy MILITARY trials were conducted and Guantanamo had a gallows there would be considerably less terrorism aimed at Americans and American interests.
Click to expand...
No need for a gallows, those are expensive; firing-squads are much cheaper and take half an hour to set up.

One wonders why one wasn’t called in at Ft. Hood long ago.
 
Son_of_Niall said:
Dude you are completely out of control.
Your remarks are not only unCatholic (as per your moniker) they are unchristian as well.
I suggest you turn off the computer and pick up the Rosary.
Click to expand...
I see nothing “unCatholic” about his words.
 
GEddie said:
No need for a gallows, those are expensive; firing-squads are much cheaper and take half an hour to set up.

One wonders why one wasn’t called in at Ft. Hood long ago.
Click to expand...
An excellent point…and a great question.
 
Operalan said:
I see nothing “unCatholic” about his words.
Click to expand...
Thank you for the support, Operalan.

I see nothing “unCatholic” about wanting to defend one’s family, home and religious conviction from uncivilized barbarians.
 
Zoltan_Cobalt said:
Thank you for the support, Operalan.

I see nothing “unCatholic” about wanting to defend one’s family, home and religious conviction from uncivilized barbarians.
Click to expand...
But sending thousands of refugee families who are peaceful back to die is indeed unCatholic , and that is precisely what you’ve effectively suggested, don’t blame others for a fews actions .

Terrorists=/= Refugees
 
Starwarsfan2 said:
But sending thousands of refugee families who are peaceful back to die is indeed unCatholic , and that is precisely what you’ve effectively suggested, don’t blame others for a fews actions .

Terrorists=/= Refugees
Click to expand...
I am not suggesting sending anyone “back to die”. I am suggesting that they not be accepted in the first place.

I am also not blaming others for the actions of a few. But until “the evil few” can be separated from the innocent “others” … the whole group must remain suspect.

I grow very tired of terrorist apologetics.

Apparently you have no feelings about placing American lives at risk. You would welcome a number of people into our country, knowing full well that a percentage of them hate and despise us and will fanatically follow their religious directions to kill us even at the cost of their own lives.

I would wonder how you will feel after the next terrorist attack on our soil is proven to be the work of islamic terrorists who masqueraded as innocent Syrian refugees.
 
Zoltan_Cobalt said:
Apparently you have no feelings about placing American lives at risk.
Click to expand...
:yawn:

I became pretty impervious after 9/11 to the ol’ “You hate America!” rhetoric directed at anyone who questioned anything. No one here has “no feelings” for American lives. It says quite a bit about the weakness of one’s position that this sort of straw man has to be used.
 
Zoltan_Cobalt said:
Thank you for the support, Operalan.

I see nothing “unCatholic” about wanting to defend one’s family, home and religious conviction from uncivilized barbarians.
Click to expand...
Islamic refugees are uncivilized barbarians?
 
Zoltan_Cobalt said:
I agree. Guantanamo became a political football and was never run properly. I would venture an educated guess that if speedy MILITARY trials were conducted and Guantanamo had a gallows there would be considerably less terrorism aimed at Americans and American interests.
Click to expand...
You are aware the Church in your moniker opposes Capital Punishment?
 
gracepoole said:
:yawn:

I became pretty impervious after 9/11 to the ol’ “You hate America!” rhetoric directed at anyone who questioned anything. No one here has “no feelings” for American lives. It says quite a bit about the weakness of one’s position that this sort of straw man has to be used.
Click to expand...
Then why not defend and protect American lives rather than excuse those with a goal of destroying American lives?

9/11 was conducted by a people who REALLY hate America. It taught me everything I needed to know about Islam.
 
The Pope, himself, has said we are fighting World War 3. That means there are sides to be taken and enemies. We need to know who the enemy is. The refugees have NOT been fully vetted…even President Obama’s own Director of the FBI say the immigration policy is greatly flawed.

We can not let the enemy in the door without proper vetting. Most people are not saying that refugees can never come—but they are saying that the process needs to slow down until the proper procedures are in place. This is what yesterday’s bill was about—it’s not about sending people back to be killed.

And, IF there are 4 million people now as refugees, couldn’t 4 million people take on less than 10,000 (as has been reported?) militants? Most generals would have loved to have those odds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top