This is just my opinion… but I think many people can over emphasize the social justice thing.
It’s not just your opinion because it’s my opnion, too. Too many people have hijacked the term, interpreting it in ways beyond how the Church herself describes it (generally), and (unlike the Church) they demand blanket endorsement of gov’t aid for all people below a certain income, including all the following:
~the people who deserve assistance because their own efforts are insufficient
~the people who lack the ability to take care of themselves, due to age, disability, or infirmity
~the people who scam the system, often conspiratorially, because they have learned how. Often they earn much more than others receiving assistance, as well as more than people who are denied assistance because they earn “too much.”
~the people who have low incomes out of choice, because they value time more than money, or choose to work in low-paying service fields, and/or prefer other kinds of low-paying jobs with little responsibility vs. higher-paying ones with lots of responsibility & visibility.
My own opinion is you take care of your family before you do strangers or your country.
It’s the Church’s opinion, too. It is sinful to neglect our immediate responsibilities in order to help strangers. It violates the Fourth Commandment (mutuality within family). Putting one’s family in danger, when one has a choice not to, is gravely sinful.
I think you have already answered your own question. The very fact that you had to add that disclaimer tells us much of how social justice has been hijacked by the liberal left in America and around the world, for their own purposes. The misunderstanding of social justice has been used to cram socialist agendas down people’s throat, been used to invent new rights for people that are man made rather than God given, has tried to make equality equal sameness rather than justice, and has been used to portray those who don’t buy into this narrow view of social justice as mean and heartless. When social justice works this way, as it all too often does, I don’t want any part of it either.
Three other reasons:
(1) Guilt-tripping others about social justice definitely gets in the way. No one likes being manipulated and harangued. And for all those who claim that Jesus did so, they are ignorant of Scripture. Jesus excoriated those who were capable of giving but were attached to their goods. He wasn’t pounding on those who themselves were part of the working poor, keeping family together.
(2) The size and distribution of the needs. This is a HUGE country. I’m not responsible, nor is any individual responsible, for closing all uncomfortable economic gaps. That is not what social justice is. Locating realistically manageable efforts and causes sometimes seems so overwhelming and unwieldly that it’s a natural reaction to give up entirely, due to the magnitude of problems and geographical disbursement of needs. Combine that with the guilt-tripping I mentioned above, and the entire subject becomes a turn-off.
(3) The understanding by some of us that reasons for needs are complex, many of them related to dysfunctional aspects of modern life: inflation, particularly for basic needs such as housing, food, fuel, and healthcare, combined (again) with the size of the population and lack of connectedness (alienation). Capitalism can be extremely brutal until you reach a level when you do “have.” And if the gov’t, for example, were to be the main source of getting people from a level of “have-not” to a level of sustained self-sufficiency in an expensive First World economoy, the gov’t would go entirely broke. There are too many people in the USA alone who “have not.”