What are the media’s moral obligations in making society aware of extreme poverty in the world?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Sock
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
REPOST:

onedayswages.org/about/wh…global-poverty
2.4 billion people live on less than $2/day (USD), and roughly 1.2 billion people live on less than $1.25/day (USD) - the definition of “extreme global poverty.”
Water
3.4 million people die every year from water related diseases around the world, and roughly 780 million people do not have access to clean water.
Health
Nearly 11,700 people die every day from HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. Close to two-thirds of these people are living in sub-Saharan Africa.
Education
61 million children of primary school age were out of school. More than half of them (33 million) were in sub-Saharan Africa and a further one fifth (13 million) in Southern Asia.
Women
A woman dies every minute due to complications during pregnancy and childbirth.
Human Trafficking
Worldwide, there are nearly two million children in the commercial sex trade.
Agriculture & hunger
Malnutrition is the underlying cause of death for at least 3.1 million children, accounting for 45% of all deaths among children under the age of five.
Everyone should be made aware of these statistics through the major media networks!
 
If you’re aware of them, Robert, chances are that “everyone” else can also access these same statistics about sub-Sahara Africa.
Were you aware of them? Is the average citizen aware of them? Do the major news networks have a moral obligation to report them to the masses? These stats are worldwide, not just Africa. 🙂
 
Yes.

Yes.

Question answered.

But your thumbnails are from Africa.
I doubt that the average citizen is aware of these stats. I had to dig through the Internet to get them for myself. How would the average citizen get these stats?

Yes, my thumbnail is from Africa, but the stats are still worldwide.
 
I doubt that the average citizen is aware of these stats. I had to dig through the Internet to get them for myself. How would the average citizen get these stats?
Because they’re apparently more widely available than you believe, or were aware of before you “dug through” to find what most people do know. Everybody I know who has at least a basic education and who is literate does know. You can keep doubting; I have no control over your “doubts.”
Yes, my thumbnail is from Africa, but the stats are still worldwide.
Your thumbnails are misleading, because they come from particular areas which other parts of the world have little influence in or control over. They are not representative of the “worldwide” statistics.

In any case, just continuing to ask the same question over and over, in various different forms, doesn’t seem to be getting you anywhere does it, in terms of relieving global poverty?
 
Elizabeth, I’m going to have disagree with you there. Every semester, I give (college) students a quiz on world poverty to see what their prior knowledge is. From 18 to perhaps 60-years-old, people routinely fail. When someone earns 60% or more and actually passes the quiz, it’s shocking because it’s such a rare event. (Lucky for them it doesn’t count toward their final grade…) They can’t identify the number of children who die each day due to poverty, how many of the world’s population live on less than $1 a day, life expectancies in third-world countries, etc. I’ve offered this quiz for the past five years and the results are abysmal. Yesterday, 1% of a class got a question related to the U.S. percentage dedicated to overseas aid correct – and those who got it wrong were *way *off (believing the U.S. is giving 5% or more, though the actual number is 0.11%). Of course, the sample size here is approximately 1000. But I’d be hard-pressed to think that my students are anomalies.
 
Elizabeth, I’m going to have disagree with you there. Every semester, I give (college) students a quiz on world poverty to see what their prior knowledge is. From 18 to perhaps 60-years-old, people routinely fail…
I can’t help the degree of ignorance of your students. I’m a teacher, too, and I find the opposite. I guess my students are exceptionally informed. In any case, neither your anecdote nor his “difficulty finding information” are projectile, statistically.

Have a nice day.
 
It’s a good idea for many reasons. it puts control of the money back into the hands of the people who give money its value. All these poverty stricken people around the world are being held hostage by usury. This is one solution that works.
Actually it would probably make billions more people poor. Ever read up on the church policy banning interest and the disastrous economic consequences that resulted?
 
Because they’re apparently more widely available than you believe, or were aware of before you “dug through” to find what most people do know. Everybody I know who has at least a basic education and who is literate does know. You can keep doubting; I have no control over your “doubts.”
Where did you learn of these stats? Where does the average citizen get them?
 
Actually it would probably make billions more people poor. Ever read up on the church policy banning interest and the disastrous economic consequences that resulted?
For your edification ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/B14VIXPE.htm

You do not understand that all modern money is borrowed into circulation at interest. If it were credited into existence without interest, all the benefits of fractional reserve lending would be realized, with none of the downside. Fractional reserve lending allows for more money to be created as needed, but is unjust in that it is fraud. It is impossible to ever repay the interest without either making a new loan, or unfairly exploiting someone. Entire national populations are in perpetual debt slavery, without any way to redeem themselves.

On the other hand, mutual credit allows for more money to be created as needed, without interest. It puts control back into the hands of the people who give money its value. It’s entirely just, in that people are crediting society instead of debiting it. Public liability notes would become public asset notes. There is no exploitation, because people are extending society credit. Even the poorest people have time and talent to offer, and with mutual credit they could get the things they need when they need them.

Usury is an assault on society. You would do well to research mutual credit and time currencies, in order to more fully understand what they are. They are significantly different from the system currently and predominantly in use throughout the world today, and they are not sinful.
 
I can’t help the degree of ignorance of your students. I’m a teacher, too, and I find the opposite. I guess my students are exceptionally informed.
I’d guess that’s as safe a bet as guessing that my students are exceptionally ignorant. I’m actually shocked that your students (college level, I assume?) are informed. But of course, I’m pleasantly shocked (so long as we’re talking about specifics regarding world poverty, that is, and not simply that world poverty exists). Aside from my own students, I work with thousands more through a campus human rights organization – and the ignorance found among all of our campuses (both urban and suburban, serving an incredibly disparate population) is routine.
In any case, neither your anecdote nor his “difficulty finding information” are projectile, statistically.
I think I said the same thing? :confused: In any case, I’d love some concrete evidence that Americans are typically knowledgeable about world poverty. I’m glad your experience has been the opposite, but you’re describing the polar opposite of my own experience. I’m assuming evidence demonstrating the knowledge you’re describing is the only solid answer to the question.
 
I’d guess that’s as safe a bet as guessing that my students are exceptionally ignorant. I’m actually shocked that your students (college level, I assume?) are informed. But of course, I’m pleasantly shocked (so long as we’re talking about specifics regarding world poverty, that is, and not simply that world poverty exists). Aside from my own students, I work with thousands more through a campus human rights organization – and the ignorance found among all of our campuses (both urban and suburban, serving an incredibly disparate population) is routine.
I don’t have to even go so far as college. My high school students appear to be better informed than your college students, possibly because they are more internationally aware than yours.
I’d love some concrete evidence that Americans are typically knowledgeable about world poverty.
And I’d like some concrete evidence, besides your anecdotes and your reporting, that they are not knowledgeable.
 
I don’t have to even go so far as college. My high school students appear to be better informed than your college students, possibly because they are more internationally aware than yours.
And to what do you attribute this exceptional international knowledge?
 
Reading what? The Internet?
Reading international news from various sources, both print and online.

This is not rocket science, Robert. It’s hard to miss, actually, unless one never reads the news or never listens to & watches anything but Sound Bite Alphabet stations with their obsession with American politics.
 
Reading international news from various sources, both print and online.

This is not rocket science, Robert. It’s hard to miss, actually, unless one never reads the news or never listens to & watches anything but Sound Bite Alphabet stations with their obsession with American politics.
Can you provide an Internet link to these types of stats from a major news network? Do a Google search on “extreme poverty” and see how many come up from a major news network.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top