A
AgnosTheist
Guest
I have no complaints about the crusades. I’m all for it! It was fully justified and a lot of good came out of it, even though the west ultimately lost.The crusades were an enterprise to regain the Holy sites that had been captured by Moslems to the peril of Christian lives when Pilgrims attempted to visit.
The church includes laymen, doesnt it? Otherwise, what did the clergy do about such atrocities? Did they actually oppose it, or let it slide?Nobody was executed who was not a Christian heretic or a recidivist. And it was the state that carried out the sentence, no the Church. Just being Jewish wasn’t a ticket to be burned at the stake.
Even given the closer relationship between Church and governments in those days, to say that the Conquistadors were “part of the Church” is a contortion that requires complete abandonment of the facts
of course they had some fair share too. but this is about catholicism. becoming a member makes someone, to same degree, a shareholder to its accomplishments, whether good or ill.And it wasn’t just Catholics who believed that heresy was worse than murder (which it is because it kills the soul. If you’re going to slam the Catholics for this, you need to give equal time to the Protestants since they sent thousands of Catholic martyrs to their deaths.