What are your "grave reasons" for using NFP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Augustinian82
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not married yet, but when we are we might use NFP since I will not have graduated with my undergrad degree yet and he will be going to school for his graduate. Financially it will be hard if we have a kid right away, but if it happens it happens!
 
Thank you 🙂 I’ve never been happier than I am now with my two babies! And what a blessing it is to have a DH who is so supportive and 100% on board with trusting God to determine our family size! It’s a real recipe for happines :bounce:
Yup! Makes life a whole lot easier when there’s less to worry about–I let God decide the big stuff like that, I know He’s a lot smarter than me!😉 Who am I to decide something as important as whether a new eternal soul should be created? That’s God’s job, I just get out of His way and let Him decide!😃
 
We are using NFP because we have one brain-injured 4-year-old girl who is in need of much therapy and special attention, and we also have a normal and highly active 2-year-old boy who is still nursing, still in diapers, and driving us nearly nuts 24 hours a day. There simply isn’t any more energy or time to go around right now. I would love to have more babies, but it’s probably going to have to wait until I can manage the two that I have.

Blessings to you!

mary

P.S. We evaluate our decisions and responsibilities regarding children and NFP not only on our own, but with the counsel of our pastor.
 
Ahh folks, NFP is not nesssarily to avoid pregnancy, NFP honestly should not be used fto avoid pregnency unless there is a grave reason. Not just a reason, a GRAVE reason.

My wife and I are using it to try to get pregnant! 😃

So would I select “Other” on the poll?
 
Though, I’m 38, so how much time do we have? 😦
My mother is about your age and expecting baby number 9 (I’m a college student). We also live in a three-bedroom house. I’m not sure of our square footage though. So it happens!
 
Ahh folks, NFP is not nesssarily to avoid pregnancy, NFP honestly should not be used fto avoid pregnency unless there is a grave reason. Not just a reason, a GRAVE reason.
There has been some discussion of late among well-repsected apologists regarding the translation “grave” or “serious.” The conclusion is that the word might be better translated “reasonable.” There are many good reasons for spacing births, and not all of them are life-and-death. But as I said in my earlier post, we always seek the advice of our pastor regarding our reasons.
 
There has been some discussion of late among well-repsected apologists regarding the translation “grave” or “serious.” The conclusion is that the word might be better translated “reasonable.” There are many good reasons for spacing births, and not all of them are life-and-death. But as I said in my earlier post, we always seek the advice of our pastor regarding our reasons.
Quite right. The CCC clearly mentions financial concerns as a reason to delay pregnancy. Financial reasons do not qualify as grave reasons. The standard for NFP being used to avoid pregnancy does not require grave reasons.

– Mark L. Chance.
 
Quite right. The CCC clearly mentions financial concerns as a reason to delay pregnancy. Financial reasons do not qualify as grave reasons. The standard for NFP being used to avoid pregnancy does not require grave reasons.

– Mark L. Chance.
Can you let us know where that is at? A #?
 
Can you let us know where that is at? A #?
Here is a quote that might be helpful:

John Paul II, 14 Dec. 1990
Through this sense of responsibility for love and life, God the Creator invites the spouses not to be passive operators, but rather “cooperators or almost interpreters” of His plan (Gaudium et Spes, no.50). In fact, they are called out of respect for the objective moral order established by God, to an obligatory discernment of the indications of God’s will concerning their family. Thus in relationship to physical, economic, psychological and social conditions, responsible parenthood will be able to be expressed “either by the deliberate and generous decision to raise a large family, or by the decision, made for serious moral reasons and with due respect for the moral law, to avoid for the time being, or even for and indeterminate period, another birth” (Humanae Vitae, n. 10).

The entire article may be found here: ccli.org/nfp/morality/churchteaching.php

mary
 
We didn’t use NFP until after we had our 4th child in 6 yrs. Then, with much prayer and discussion, we decided to use it, and each month we revisit it. For us, our age (41 and 43), our finances (we live in an expensive area) and the general mayhem of our life with a somewhat large & active family, has given us reason to pause.

I grew up in a large family and it is wonderful. But not everyone is cut out for it. Is it better to be worried that you won’t be able to handle it or to go for it and let the chips fall as they may? Who knows? It really is a decision for each couple to make, within the realm of the Church and your faith.

I think it’s really easy to say that you would never practice NFP before you have a bunch of kids and you are looking at the other side of 40. My husband & I were much more adventuresome when we were younger and I’m happy that we were, for I wouldn’t have the four beautiful children that we have today if it were not so.
 
We used NFP to concieve children because of fertility issues. We have used NFP to not concieve because I kept delivering dead babies and could not stand the thought of delivering one more child that I would not be able to see taking it’s first breath. We used NFP to not concieve because I was going to have surgery for endometreosis. We have also used it to not concieve so that the doctors could treat a thyroid problem. Now we are using NFP to make sure my hormones are balanced. I would love to just throw my charting out the window and have more babies!
 
I’m looking into the question of NFP before I get married, but after having talking it over with my boyfriend, we have no reasons to use NFP in the future, really. I’m just curious to see what your reasons are and then I’ll use that for my Moral Theology class… No names mentioned! 🙂

Oh and if you don’t use NFP at all, can you please specify why you and your spouse have made that decision?
Now that my dh and I have rediscovered NFP, and discovered God’s intent for our sexuality, though His mighty grace…I would say that our wanting to not ‘intentionally’ have more kids is largely due to my husband’s age, he is nearly 50. I’m nearly 40. He is concerned that he is too old, and that he is not sure how it would be having a 12 year old at 60. Oh, how I wish we had a rewind button in life. How I wish we didn’t take for granted our sexuality in my stronger child bearing years. But, if God were to bless us with a new life he said that would be God’s will. We are not ‘intentionally’ trying to have more children.

God bless all of you who are following NFP. Please keep me and my dh in your prayers.:o
 
Now that my dh and I have rediscovered NFP, and discovered God’s intent for our sexuality, though His mighty grace…I would say that our wanting to not ‘intentionally’ have more kids is largely due to my husband’s age, he is nearly 50. I’m nearly 40. He is concerned that he is too old, and that he is not sure how it would be having a 12 year old at 60. Oh, how I wish we had a rewind button in life. How I wish we didn’t take for granted our sexuality in my stronger child bearing years. But, if God were to bless us with a new life he said that would be God’s will. We are not ‘intentionally’ trying to have more children.

God bless all of you who are following NFP. Please keep me and my dh in your prayers.:o
Just a word of encouragement. My father had eight children (unfortunately two separate marriages). He had his last two, my brother and me, when he was 55 and 53 respectively. He is now approaching 79, and I am 26, and we have a beautiful relationship. Having children in his mid-fifties kept him young in body and spirit. He has never looked or acted “his age,” and although I know he probably won’t be around for the latter half of my life, I wouldn’t change a thing. There’s a whole lot one can impart to a child in 20 or 30 years.

Besides … with all the medical advances of our modern age, everyone is saying “60 is the new 40.” 😉

Blessings,

mary
 
We used NFP to concieve children because of fertility issues. We have used NFP to not concieve because I kept delivering dead babies and could not stand the thought of delivering one more child that I would not be able to see taking it’s first breath. We used NFP to not concieve because I was going to have surgery for endometreosis. We have also used it to not concieve so that the doctors could treat a thyroid problem. Now we are using NFP to make sure my hormones are balanced. I would love to just throw my charting out the window and have more babies!
God bless you.
 
Just a word of encouragement. My father had eight children (unfortunately two separate marriages). He had his last two, my brother and me, when he was 55 and 53 respectively. He is now approaching 79, and I am 26, and we have a beautiful relationship. Having children in his mid-fifties kept him young in body and spirit. He has never looked or acted “his age,” and although I know he probably won’t be around for the latter half of my life, I wouldn’t change a thing. There’s a whole lot one can impart to a child in 20 or 30 years.

Besides … with all the medical advances of our modern age, everyone is saying “60 is the new 40.” 😉

Blessings,

mary
Thank you very much for this support, mary! It is strange, but we both just want to do God’s will…not that that is strange,but never thought that we would even consider another child, at this stage. And truthfully, we are using NFP to follow the RCC’s teachings, and so forth, to keep from having further children, but if we somehow get pregnant despite staying away from the fertile times, then it would be God’s will. My kids are not happy that my husband and I were chatting about the what if, of having a new baby. I was explaining the Church’s teaching on sexuality, which went over my daughter’s head, seeing that she is only in 6th grade, but my son was intently listening…he understand sexuality, and did not know that there are 'rules of engagement,'so to speak…He said, why does God have all these rules? Suffice to say, we had a nice long talk about that last night.😃 But, it is out of love that God provides us a blueprint of how we are to live as husband and wife.

My daughter said…‘why can’t you and daddy just give each other a kiss to show you love each other?’ 😃 Out of the mouths of babes, I tell ya. We need an extra room in our house–like a secret room–where the kids can’t hear all of our adult conversations!:o

Thanks and blessings to you!
 
We don’t use anything now, but have used NFP when we both had (severe) mental health issues. A child just wouldn’t have been ‘safe’ for all parties concerned, shall we say. These days we don’t use NFP but still haven’t fallen pregnant in 3 years, so maybe God feels the way we do, the two we have is enough;) !

Anna x
 
We don’t use it. We’re infertile. We started out using it in the hopes of conceiving quickly, and all of the months that I charted showed normal ovulation patterns and reasonable luteal phases. After several months of not conceiving despite apparent normalcy, we stopped charting due to the stress that it was placing on our marriage. It’s been about three years since we stopped, with one known miscarriage and no other evidence of pregnancy. 🤷
 
Did not vote because we don’t use NFP. We decided through much prayer, discussion and reading the CCC (in the second edition (2000), it’s p. 569 - “the fucundity of marriage”) that we had no “just” reason because there is no physical reason for us to avoid and even though we strugle finacially, we realized that each child actually costs less per child the more you have and if you don’t let your pride get in the way and do a little research, there are a lot of social programs in the U.S. to help. We live in Wisconsin and because we are self-employed, we qualify for “Badger Care”(since 2000) state paid for health insurance, and with this current pregnancy WIC and “Food Share”(food stamps using a card), all more easily qualified for because of the size of our family. We don’t feel poor, but the federal government says we are because the size of our family, We are now expecting child #6 in January 😃 , lost #5 to misscarrage:( two years ago. We moved out to the country (from the city of Milwaukee to rural Manitowoc Co. after the misscarrage) to a big old farm house. It needed some work, but it greatly decreased our cost of living.
Code:
It took us until I was pregnant with our second child (in 1999) and extra graces from the Holy Spirit, before coming to this conclusion though -mostly because of me. DH always wanted to remain open to life and not use any contraceptives, but because of fear and ingnorance I insisted on it when we first were married in 1994, though we learned NFP then, it just logically didn't seem any different than using artifical contraceptives because the contraceptive mentality (for selfish reasons or fear of what others would say) prevailed in the people teaching, learning and using NFP. 

As far as spacing of children, I have breastfed all my children and have been blessed with a good amount of natural spacing from breastfeeding, in fact I don't even get my period back until about 2-3 months after completely stopping and the soonest I got pregnant after my period returned was another 3 months.  Now that I am 39 I seem to have lost even more of my fertility, it took almost 2 years after the miscarrage to get pregnant again.  So for all the people who tell you you're going to have a dozen children if you don't use some sort of contraception they just don't understand that most couples are just not that fertile. And they are living in the fear that society has put into our culture since about the 1960's when children were looked at as more of a burden than a blessing.

   It's not always easy, but their great!!!!! 

   Proud mother of David - 11, Nathaniel - 8, Tiffany - 6,
Colin - 4, Shannon - our angel, Isabel - due January 21, 2008.
Jennifer, St. Nazianz, WI
 
Did not vote because we don’t use NFP. We decided through much prayer, discussion and reading the CCC (in the second edition (2000), it’s p. 569 - “the fucundity of marriage”) that we had no “just” reason because there is no physical reason for us to avoid and even though we strugle finacially, we realized that each child actually costs less per child the more you have and if you don’t let your pride get in the way and do a little research, there are a lot of social programs in the U.S. to help. We live in Wisconsin and because we are self-employed, we qualify for “Badger Care”(since 2000) state paid for health insurance, and with this current pregnancy WIC and “Food Share”(food stamps using a card), all more easily qualified for because of the size of our family. We don’t feel poor, but the federal government says we are because the size of our family, We are now expecting child #6 in January 😃 , lost #5 to misscarrage:( two years ago. We moved out to the country (from the city of Milwaukee to rural Manitowoc Co. after the misscarrage) to a big old farm house. It needed some work, but it greatly decreased our cost of living.
Code:
It took us until I was pregnant with our second child (in 1999) and extra graces from the Holy Spirit, before coming to this conclusion though -mostly because of me. DH always wanted to remain open to life and not use any contraceptives, but because of fear and ingnorance I insisted on it when we first were married in 1994, though we learned NFP then, it just logically didn't seem any different than using artifical contraceptives because the contraceptive mentality (for selfish reasons or fear of what others would say) prevailed in the people teaching, learning and using NFP. 

As far as spacing of children, I have breastfed all my children and have been blessed with a good amount of natural spacing from breastfeeding, in fact I don't even get my period back until about 2-3 months after completely stopping and the soonest I got pregnant after my period returned was another 3 months.  Now that I am 39 I seem to have lost even more of my fertility, it took almost 2 years after the miscarrage to get pregnant again.  So for all the people who tell you you're going to have a dozen children if you don't use some sort of contraception they just don't understand that most couples are just not that fertile. And they are living in the fear that society has put into our culture since about the 1960's when children were looked at as more of a burden than a blessing.

   It's not always easy, but their great!!!!! 

   Proud mother of David - 11, Nathaniel - 8, Tiffany - 6,
Colin - 4, Shannon - our angel, Isabel - due January 21, 2008.
Code:
                         Jennifer, St. Nazianz, WI
Your post is inspiring!!! Thank you for sharing this. I have read about ecological breastfeeding??? That it does help to space the children…things have changed since I’ve had babies.:o
 
Ain’t it great that we can go to the CCC and get clarification? Here are a couple of points to give a read:

2368 A particular aspect of this responsibility concerns the regulation of procreation. For just reasons, spouses may wish to space the births of their children. It is their duty to make certain that their desire is not motivated by selfishness but is in conformity with the generosity appropriate to responsible parenthood. Moreover, they should conform their behavior to the objective criteria of morality:
When it is a question of harmonizing married love with the responsible transmission of life, the morality of the behavior does not depend on sincere intention and evaluation of motives alone; but it must be determined by objective criteria, criteria drawn from the nature of the person and his acts criteria that respect the total meaning of mutual self-giving and human procreation in the context of true love; this is possible only if the virtue of married chastity is practiced with sincerity of heart.156
2369 "By safeguarding both these essential aspects, the unitive and the procreative, the conjugal act preserves in its fullness the sense of true mutual love and its orientation toward man’s exalted vocation to parenthood."157
2370 Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity with the objective criteria of morality.158 These methods respect the bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, “every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible” is intrinsically evil:159
Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality. . . . The difference, both anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle . . . involves in the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of human sexuality.160
2399 The regulation of births represents one of the aspects of responsible fatherhood and motherhood. Legitimate intentions on the part of the spouses do not justify recourse to morally unacceptable means (for example, direct sterilization or contraception).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top