P
pacloc
Guest
This is an interesting debate going on about the destination of protestants. I only would mention that while the posters quoting saints and Church documents are speaking more truthfully than those saying most protestants are going to Heaven, they really do not have the right to be teaching if this is the method they use. Teaching is a very dangerous thing to take lightly since souls are involved. If what you use is the brute threat of hell and excommunication and authority of the “Church says so” you do not have the right to instruct the weaker members. It is the same to tell a 5 year old that everything you tell them to do is done merely because I say so and you will go to hell if you don’t do what I say. A true teacher explains why the child should do something, because of it being good and the right thing to do, not because of the consequence. The consequence is good too, but not for the reason. Likewise it is wrong to spout out “Hell, Hell, Hell” knowing that protestants are present on these forums and will likely not make any change in their view of the Church from hearing just the consequence. What needs to be stressed is how the Church makes sense, how it answers things that protestants have no answer for. Our view of the incarnation is a good starting point, our view of how God has made us in a way that we really do earn merit since we were made in His image and likeness.
I think both parties mean well, but please recognize that the method in teaching is what is important here. Hell does have to come up, but not right off the bat and not without an explanation of what hell is and how it is that we are withdrawing from God not God withdrawing from us.
I think both parties mean well, but please recognize that the method in teaching is what is important here. Hell does have to come up, but not right off the bat and not without an explanation of what hell is and how it is that we are withdrawing from God not God withdrawing from us.