What Catholic teachings do I object to?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ltwin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The quote is the first sentence of CCC 1260. It is helpful to read the rest of the paragraph. scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1260.htm

Yes, I am well aware of the confusion regarding Jesus as being the only person capable of reconciling all of humanity with divinity. Obviously, this is connected to the necessity of a visible Catholic Church on earth with Jesus Christ as its head. As we know, Jesus works through the Catholic Church which is His Mystical Body.

The above does not mean that Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit are limited or restricted in any way. Please see post 419 for the companion paragraphs.

To answer this comment from post 419. “The Church doesn’t “add” anything nor does it “draw out” from Scripture. Those terms are misleading–although I doubt you meant them to be so.” Post 419 is not mine…

In Church language there is a difference between “add” and “draw out from Scripture”. An explanation of this is found in CCC 65-67. In addition to CCC 66, it is important to read the cross-reference in the margin which is CCC 94, the first paragraph therein. Note that this first paragraph refers back to CCC 66.

One of the contemporary difficulties with the concept of “draws out a teaching from Scripture” is that not every Catholic is familiar with the protocol of the visible society of the Catholic Church on earth. It is this working of protocol regarding properly defining and duly proclaiming Catholic doctrines which makes CCC 66 possible.

An interesting topic for another thread might be the protocol of the Catholic Church in regard to teaching Divine Revelation.

Currently I am studying answers to OP Itwin’s posts on the concept that there is only one Church and it is made up of all those who call Christ Lord. In my humble opinion, there is a relationship between the necessity for one established visible Church and infallibility of doctrines which was the initial issue of this thread. Most likely, the paragraphs cited above will be part of my presented argument.
Agreed. Not sure what you meant by the following: "To answer this comment from post 419. “The Church doesn’t “add” anything nor does it “draw out” from Scripture. Those terms are misleading–although I doubt you meant them to be so.” :confused:
 
You’re taking my words too far and not really trying to help answer any questions either. Breathing is extra biblical by your definition because the bible doesn’t tell us we should breathe to stay alive.

What I was trying to say is that is there is indeed tradition that goes along with the bible, but from what I’ve seen the bible (since becoming completed) has since recorded the sacred tradition within its pages. I’m trying to say that most things catholic subscribe to as sacred tradition is backed up biblically anyway and in the cases where it’s not my question is how can we determine that it is valid when it is tradition not directly from God (as most understand the words of the bible to be through the inspiration of the holy spirit) but from some person who claims to be guided by the spirit but doesn’t necessarily give any reason to believe what they claim is true?

Is the answer that “it’s from the church so we know it’s valid?” That’s what I’m trying to ascertain. My suggestion was that because the bible doesn’t give a precedence for tradition that is not also recorded in its words then how can I trust tradition that comes to light thousands of years after the word was completed? **You trust it because of the knowledge we derive from the bible. Do we not? /**COLOR] If a validly ordained bishop in the catholic church says something wrong, teaches something wrong, he can’t just call it tradition and we all call it a day. So my question is what is extra biblical tradition being verified by?

This is a little rambly, sorry if it’s unclear.

The only reason we trust the Bible in particular the NT is because of the CHURCH Jesus founded,not vice versa. The Christian Church did not come from the Bible as many non-Catholics believe. Jesus founded His Church…not write the Bible. Christianity is a religion of the person: Christ. We are not a people of the book (Judaism,Islam) but of the person Jesus.
 
Agreed. Not sure what you meant by the following: "To answer this comment from post 419. “The Church doesn’t “add” anything nor does it “draw out” from Scripture. Those terms are misleading–although I doubt you meant them to be so.” :confused:
Double duty. I was answering post 419. Sorry for the confusion. :o
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top