What criteria constitute a eucharistic celebration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter o_mlly
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
O

o_mlly

Guest
Canon 917 states: "A person who has already received the Most Holy Eucharist can receive it a second time on the same day only within the eucharistic celebration in which the person participates, without prejudice to the prescript of ⇒ can. 921, §2. "

Can anyone provide either canonical or magisterial references identifying the criteria for a “eucharistic celebration” within the context of 917? Obviously, the Mass qualifies. But does the Liturgy of the Word with Holy Communion also qualify. If not, why not. Altough opinions are important, I’m looking for an argument with supporting references in official church documents. Thanks.

Peace,
O’Malley
 
Canon 917 states: "A person who has already received the Most Holy Eucharist can receive it a second time on the same day only within the eucharistic celebration in which the person participates, without prejudice to the prescript of ⇒ can. 921, §2. "

Can anyone provide either canonical or magisterial references identifying the criteria for a “eucharistic celebration” within the context of 917? Obviously, the Mass qualifies. But does the Liturgy of the Word with Holy Communion also qualify. If not, why not. Altough opinions are important, I’m looking for an argument with supporting references in official church documents. Thanks.

Peace,
O’Malley
Your answer is in Canon 899 which defines “Eucharistic Celebration”. Only one thing qualifies: MASS.
THE EUCHARISTIC CELEBRATION
Can. 899 §1. The eucharistic celebration is the action of Christ himself and the Church. In it, Christ the Lord, through the ministry of the priest, offers himself, substantially present under the species of bread and wine, to God the Father and gives himself as spiritual food to the faithful united with his offering.
 
Your answer is in Canon 899 which defines “Eucharistic Celebration”. Only one thing qualifies: MASS.
Your conclusion, I think, is an illogical interpretation of Canon 899 since it is a negation of the terms without an inversion. That is, it does not logically folllow from, “A Mass is a eucharistic celebration” that “A non-Mass is not a eucharistic celebrattion.” The contrapostive properly stated is “A non-eucharastic celebration is not a Mass.”

As I said in post, the Mass clearly is a eucharistic celebration. Canon 899 says as much but it does not say that no other liturgy may be in the same category.

For instance, we have in the “Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest”
Sacred Congregation for the Sacraments and Divine Worship
catholicliturgy.com/index.cfm/FuseAction/DocumentContents/Index/2/SubIndex/11/DocumentIndex/55

"…20. ‘Among the forms of celebration found in liturgical tradition when Mass is not possible, a celebration of the word of God is particularly recommended, and also its completion, when possible, by eucharistic communion.’”

Peace,
O’Malley
 
So are you saying that you believe a Celebration of the Eucharist and a Eucharistic Celebration are two different things?

I think that particular chapter of the Code of Canon Law is crystal clear. I have a hard time believing that anyone reading it could have a different interpretation. A Eucharistic Celebration is one in which the Blessed Sacrament is confectioned. It requires a presbyter (priest/bishop). A Celebration of the Word with Communion simply isn’t “Christ the Lord, through the ministry of the priest, offering himself, substantially present under the species of bread and wine, to God the Father and giving himself as spiritual food to the faithful united with his offering.” That only happens at Mass.
 
As I said in post, the Mass clearly is a eucharistic celebration. Canon 899 says as much but it does not say that no other liturgy may be in the same category.

For instance, we have in the “Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest”
Sacred Congregation for the Sacraments and Divine Worship
catholicliturgy.com/index.cfm/FuseAction/DocumentContents/Index/2/SubIndex/11/DocumentIndex/55

"…20. ‘Among the forms of celebration found in liturgical tradition when Mass is not possible, a celebration of the word of God is particularly recommended, and also its completion, when possible, by Eucharistic communion.’”
THE EUCHARISTIC CELEBRATION
Can. 899 §1. The Eucharistic celebration is the action of Christ himself and the Church. In it, Christ the Lord, through the ministry of the priest, offers himself, substantially present under the species of bread and wine, to God the Father and gives himself as spiritual food to the faithful united with his offering.
I think the key parts of Can.899 are what I have highlighted. It is only in the context of the Mass when Christ’s sacrifice is re-presented to the Father, when the priest confects and consumes the Eucharist. Since the confection of the Eucharist only occurs during the Mass, it stands to reason that the Mass, Divine Liturgy, or Qorbono is the only Eucharistic Celebration.
 
A Eucharistic Celebration is where a Priest or Bishop, following an approved rite of the Church, confects (or accomplishes as we say in the East) the Mystery of Christ’s Sacramental Body and Blood.

A notable exception to this is the Liturgy of the Pre-Sanctified Gifts celebrated in Great Lent. Again, only a Priest or Bishop may celebrate this.

Therefore, Typica with Communion, bringing the Eucharist to Shut-Ins, or Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest, are NOT Eucharistic Celebrations, as they need not be led by Priests.
 
The Eucharist, properly speaking, is the consecration of bread and wine followed by the offering of the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity to God the Father – these two actions are part of the Eucharistic Prayer. If that doesn’t happen, it’s not a “Eucharistic celebration.” Any liturgy that involves receiving Communion that was consecrated at an earlier Mass is not a “Eucharistic celebration.”
 
Canon 917 states: "A person who has already received the Most Holy Eucharist can receive it a second time on the same day only within the eucharistic celebration in which the person participates, without prejudice to the prescript of ⇒ can. 921, §2. "

Can anyone provide either canonical or magisterial references identifying the criteria for a “eucharistic celebration” within the context of 917? Obviously, the Mass qualifies. But does the Liturgy of the Word with Holy Communion also qualify. If not, why not. Altough opinions are important, I’m looking for an argument with supporting references in official church documents. Thanks.

Peace,
O’Malley
the Eucharistic Celebration is Mass. nothing else qualifies. a communion service is just that, not the Eucharistic Celebration, which requires confection of the sacrament.
 
So are you saying that you believe a Celebration of the Eucharist and a Eucharistic Celebration are two different things?

I think that particular chapter of the Code of Canon Law is crystal clear. I have a hard time believing that anyone reading it could have a different interpretation. A Eucharistic Celebration is one in which the Blessed Sacrament is confectioned. It requires a presbyter (priest/bishop). A Celebration of the Word with Communion simply isn’t “Christ the Lord, through the ministry of the priest, offering himself, substantially present under the species of bread and wine, to God the Father and giving himself as spiritual food to the faithful united with his offering.” That only happens at Mass.
Thanks to all who opined but a special thanks to Phemie who as requested was the only responder whose argument went beyond opinion offering an authoritative reference in Can. 899. In matters of law, canon or secular, opinion doesn’t count for much.

I think I’ve shown that the extension of the wording of Can. 899 to the conclude that the list (or set) of eucharistic celebrations is populated by only one liturgy – the Mass, to be illogical although possible.

I am sympathetic to that argument but cannot find in any Church document an unambiguous statement that only the Mass constitutes a eucharistic celebration. Further confusing the issue, is the Church’s frequent use of the term “eucharistic” for actions within liturgies other than the Mass, such as refereneced earlier in “Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest” where paragraph 20 commends our liturgical celebrations with eucharistic communion outside Mass. Is it not logical to conclude that such a liturgy by its won defining terms is a eucharistic celebration albeit not to be confused with the celebration of the Eucharist?

Or read Redemptionis Sacramentum: "The worship of the Eucharist outside the Sacrifice of the Mass is a tribute of inestimable value in the life of the Church. Such worship is closely linked to the celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice. Therefore both public and private devotion to the Most Holy Eucharist even outside Mass should be vigorously promoted, … ‘It is the responsibility of sacred Pastors, even by the witness of their life, to support the practice of Eucharistic worship and especially exposition of the Most Holy Sacrament, as well as prayer of adoration before Christ present under the eucharistic species.’”

While Eucharistic Exposition and Adoration are certainly not the Eucharistic Sacrifice, can we say that they are not eucharistic celebrations?

I was hoping that someone whose reading was deeper than mine in Catholic teaching could provide the reference as it is not a complicated statement for our bishops somewhere in the plethora of Eucharistic teachings to pronounce simply that the only eucharistic celebration is the Mass. Since, unlike me, the bishops are Spirit led, I must conclude the ambiguity exists for a reason, a reason beyond my understanding.

Peace,
O’Malley
 
While Eucharistic Exposition and Adoration are certainly not the Eucharistic Sacrifice, can we say that they are not eucharistic celebrations?

I was hoping that someone whose reading was deeper than mine in Catholic teaching could provide the reference as it is not a complicated statement for our bishops somewhere in the plethora of Eucharistic teachings to pronounce simply that the only eucharistic celebration is the Mass. Since, unlike me, the bishops are Spirit led, I must conclude the ambiguity exists for a reason, a reason beyond my understanding.

Peace,
O’Malley
I can’t point to any reference but a Eucharistic Communion means that we physically receive the Body & Blood of Christ in Communion – as opposed to a Spiritual Communion.

If such an occasion were properly a “Eucharistic Celebration” there would be no need for Canon 917 as it is written. It would just say “You can receive twice in one day.”

I think Canon 918 makes it even clearer:
Can. 918 It is highly recommended that the faithful receive holy communion during the eucharistic celebration itself. It is to be administered outside the Mass, however, to those who request it for a just cause, with the liturgical rites being observed.
 
I think I’ve shown that the extension of the wording of Can. 899 to the conclude that the list (or set) of eucharistic celebrations is populated by only one liturgy – the Mass, to be illogical although possible.
You have not convinced me of that.
Can. 899 §1 The celebration of the Eucharist is an action of Christ himself and of the Church. In it Christ the Lord, through the ministry of the priest, offers himself, substantially present under the appearances of bread and wine, to God the Father, and gives himself as spiritual nourishment to the faithful who are associated with him in his offering.

§2 In the eucharistic assembly the people of God are called together under the presidency of the Bishop or of a priest authorised by him, who acts in the person of Christ. All the faithful present, whether clerics or lay people, unite to participate in their own way, according to their various orders and liturgical roles.

§3 The eucharistic celebration is to be so ordered that all the participants derive from it the many fruits for which Christ the Lord instituted the eucharistic Sacrifice.
The two phrases “celebration of the Eucharist” and “Eucharistic celebration” are referring to the same thing here. In fact, let’s use the normative official Latin text of the CIC to remove all doubt:
DE EUCHARISTICA CELEBRATIONE

Can. 899 — § 1. Eucharistica celebratio actio est ipsius Christi et Ecclesiae, in qua Christus Dominus, ministerio sacerdotis, semetipsum, sub speciebus panis et vini substantialiter praesentem, Deo Patri offert atque fidelibus in sua oblatione sociatis se praebet ut cibum spiritualem.

§ 2. In eucharistica Synaxi populus Dei in unum convocatur, Episcopo aut, sub eius auctoritate, presbytero praeside, personam Christi gerente, atque omnes qui intersunt fideles, sive clerici sive laici, suo quisque modo pro ordinum et liturgicorum munerum diversitate, participando concurrunt.

§ 3. Celebratio eucharistica ita ordinetur, ut omnes participantes exinde plurimos capiant fructus, ad quos obtinendos Christus Dominus Sacrificium eucharisticum instituit.
The same Latin phrase is used in both places. Thus, since 899 § 1 defines what the eucharistica celebratio is (and in no way that I can see which infers the existence of other rites that constitute a eucharistica celebratio), I think it is understood universally (or should be) that eucharistica celebratio = Mass.

And the Church might very well be currently using wordy and ambiguous expressions to her detriment. I don’t know why or when the English phrase “Eucharistic celebration” came into vogue. The first place I know of its use in a Church document is the English translation of De Musica Sacra et Sacra Liturgia from 1958:
The more noble form of the Eucharistic celebration is the solemn Mass because in it the solemnities of ceremonies, ministers, and sacred music all combine to express the magnificence of the divine mysteries, and to impress upon the minds of the faithful the devotion with which they should contemplate them
It was also used in Vatican II:
Priests themselves extend to the other hours of the day the praise and thanksgiving of the Eucharistic celebration Eucharistiae celebratione: “celebration of the Eucharist (noun)”] in praying the Divine Office, offered in the name of the Church for all the people entrusted to their care, and indeed for the whole world. (Presbyterorum Ordinis 5)

Everyone also knows with what great love the Christians of the East celebrate the sacred liturgy, especially the eucharistic celebration celebrationem eucharisticam: “eucharistic (adjective) celebration”], source of the Church’s life and pledge of future glory, in which the faithful, united with their bishop, have access to God the Father through the Son, the Word made flesh, Who suffered and has been glorified, and so, in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, they enter into communion with the most holy Trinity, being made ``sharers of the divine nature’’. Hence, through the celebration of the Holy Eucharist in each of these churches, the Church of God is built up and grows in stature and through concelebration, their communion with one another is made manifest. (Unitatis Redintegratio 15)
Read Redemptionis Sacramentum or Sacramentum Caritatis and you’ll see that “Eucharistic celebration” means precisely the Divine Liturgy, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
 
the Mass is the Eucharistic Celebration, they are one in the same, asking for a definition of one is asking for a definition of both, that is not opinion, but obvious by reading the texts already cited, Mass is the shorthand term, Eucharistic Celebration is the precise term
 
Further evidence that “Eucharistic celebration” means “the Mass”. Read the context in which this phrase appears and you will see that the Church is speaking about that liturgy in which the Eucharist is confected and offered to the Almighty Father.

1967 - Eucharisticum Mysterium

The faithful are to be led to the practice of receiving communion in the actual eucharistic celebration. But priests are not to refuse to give communion to those who request it for a just reason outside Mass. (33a)

1973 - Eucharistiae Participationem

Meanwhile, many have expressed a desire to adapt the Eucharistic celebration still further by the composition of new prayer forms, including even new Eucharistic Prayers. (4)

The ecclesial dimension of the Eucharistic celebration is to be highly esteemed. For while such a celebration “expresses and brings about the unity of the faithful who form one body in Christ,” “the celebration of Mass is of itself a profession of faith in which the whole Church recognizes and expresses itself.” (11)

1983 - Code of Canon Law

Can. 389 He is frequently to preside at the Eucharistic celebration in the cathedral church or in some other church of his diocese, especially on holydays of obligation and on other solemnities.

Can. 899 §3 The eucharistic celebration is to be so ordered that all the participants derive from it the many fruits for which Christ the Lord instituted the eucharistic Sacrifice.

Can. 918 It is most strongly recommended that the faithful receive holy communion in the course of a eucharistic celebration. If, however, for good reason they ask for it apart from the Mass, it is to be administered to them, observing the liturgical rites.

(Also see Can. 924-930, 931-933) which deals with the rites, ceremonies, time, and place of the Eucharistic Celebration.)

Can. 1248 §1 The obligation of assisting at Mass is satisfied wherever Mass is celebrated in a catholic rite either on a holyday itself or on the evening of the previous day.

§2 If it is impossible to assist at a eucharistic celebration, either because no sacred minister is available or for some other grave reason, the faithful are strongly recommended to take part in a liturgy of the Word …]

1997 - Ecclesiae de Mysterio

In eucharistic celebrations deacons and non-ordained members of the faithful may not pronounce prayers - e.g. especially the eucharistic prayer, with its concluding doxology - or any other parts of the liturgy reserved to the celebrant priest. … It is a grave abuse for any member of the non-ordained faithful to “quasi preside” at the Mass while leaving only that minimal participation to the priest which is necessary to secure validity.

2002 - GIRM (This is the General Instruction on the Roman Missal, which deals with the Mass.)

[T]he Eucharistic Celebration is the Paschal Banquet… (80)

The wine for the eucharistic celebration must be from the fruit of the grapevine, natural, and unadulterated, that is, without admixture of extraneous substances. (322)

2004 - Redemptionis Sacramentum

The offerings that Christ’s faithful are accustomed to present for the Liturgy of the Eucharist in Holy Mass are not necessarily limited to bread and wine for the Eucharistic celebration, but may also include gifts given by the faithful in the form of money or other things for the sake of charity toward the poor. (70)

2005 - Propositions from the Synod of Bishops on the Eucharist

Holy Masses celebrated in small groups must foster a more conscious, active and fruitful participation in the Eucharist. (Proposition 32: Eucharistic Celebration in Small Groups)

2007 - Sacramentum Caritatis

I would like to comment briefly on the observations of the Synod Fathers regarding the dismissal at the end of the eucharistic celebration. After the blessing, the deacon or the priest dismisses the people with the words: Ite, missa est. These words help us to grasp the relationship between the Mass just celebrated and the mission of Christians in the world. (51)
 
CCCC said:
275. What are the names for this sacrament?

1328-1332

The unfathomable richness of this sacrament is expressed in different names which evoke its various aspects. The most common names are: the Eucharist, Holy Mass, the Lord’s Supper, the Breaking of the Bread, the Eucharistic Celebration, the Memorial of the passion, death and Resurrection of the Lord, the Holy Sacrifice, the Holy and Divine Liturgy, the Sacred Mysteries, the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar, and Holy Communion.

The Compendium on the Catechism also explicitly identifies the two terms.
 
Again, thanks to all who have provided additional references on the meaning of “eucharistic celebration.” And, also again, I would point out that I will believe what the Church teaches and I want to believe that only the Mass satisfies the criteria for a “eucharistic celebration.”

My dilemma:

I list below the approved liturgical words and actions of an EMHC as approved by the USCCB:

“Celebration of the Liturgy of the Word [With Holy Communion]” (page 107) …
"Communion Rite (page 135) …
"Communion” (page 139) …
"146 The leader says quietly: 'May the body of Christ bring me to everlasting life.’
The leader reverently consumes the body of Christ.”

*Source *: Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest, Leader’s Edition, Prepared by the Committee on the Liturgy National Conference of Bishops, The Liturgical Press; Collegeville, MN, 1997.
(You can view the on-line PDF version on page 173 at: books.google.com/books?id=jMEfI6A_P5IC&pg=PA11&lpg=PA11&dq=Sunday+Celebrations+in+the+Absence+of+a+Priest.+USCCB&source=bl&ots=d37K3FApsn&sig=ocvkFKmm5hCtMWz7kIX2klvzK4Y&hl=en&ei=xLz5StOQMdWNnQem9NSEDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBcQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=Sunday%20Celebrations%20in%20the%20Absence%20of%20a%20Priest.%20USCCB&f=false)

Note that the bishops instruct the EMHC to self-communicate our Lord in this liturgy on Sunday. Since, this liturgy does not fulfill the EMHC’s Sunday Mass obligation, all other things equal, he or she has or will attend Mass on this solemn liturgical day which began at 4 PM Saturday evening.

I conduct two Sunday sessions of the Liturgy of the Word with Holy Communion (LTWWHC) at two different facilities (security levels) at a federal prison. To meet my duties at prison, logistically, I must attend the Saturday evening Mass at my parish and, I believe, should receive Communion with my fellow parishioners. (See CCC #1388).

So, if I follow the advice of many forum posters, I would ignore the liturgical action prescribed by the bishops during the Communion Rite at the prison, and, as leader, decline Communion with the inmates since these LTWWHC are not a “eucharistic celebrations.”

I will pray on it.

Peace,
O’Malley
 
You don’t have to receive at both Liturgies of the Word with Communion. It isn’t like Mass where the Mass isn’t complete if the priest doesn’t consume. You may take communion and the rite tell you how but there is no obligation to do so if you can’t.

As for your logistics, you can receive in your parish on Saturday and receive again on Sunday because that’s two different days. You may only receive once on Sunday though since the second time would not be at Mass.
 
Again, thanks to all who have provided additional references on the meaning of “eucharistic celebration.” And, also again, I would point out that I will believe what the Church teaches and I want to believe that only the Mass satisfies the criteria for a “eucharistic celebration.”

My dilemma:

I list below the approved liturgical words and actions of an EMHC as approved by the USCCB:

“Celebration of the Liturgy of the Word [With Holy Communion]” (page 107) …
"Communion Rite (page 135) …
"Communion” (page 139) …
"146 The leader says quietly: 'May the body of Christ bring me to everlasting life.’
The leader reverently consumes the body of Christ.”

*Source *: Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest, Leader’s Edition, Prepared by the Committee on the Liturgy National Conference of Bishops, The Liturgical Press; Collegeville, MN, 1997.
(You can view the on-line PDF version on page 173 at: books.google.com/books?id=jMEfI6A_P5IC&pg=PA11&lpg=PA11&dq=Sunday+Celebrations+in+the+Absence+of+a+Priest.+USCCB&source=bl&ots=d37K3FApsn&sig=ocvkFKmm5hCtMWz7kIX2klvzK4Y&hl=en&ei=xLz5StOQMdWNnQem9NSEDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBcQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=Sunday%20Celebrations%20in%20the%20Absence%20of%20a%20Priest.%20USCCB&f=false)

Note that the bishops instruct the EMHC to self-communicate our Lord in this liturgy on Sunday. Since, this liturgy does not fulfill the EMHC’s Sunday Mass obligation, all other things equal, he or she has or will attend Mass on this solemn liturgical day which began at 4 PM Saturday evening.

I conduct two Sunday sessions of the Liturgy of the Word with Holy Communion (LTWWHC) at two different facilities (security levels) at a federal prison. To meet my duties at prison, logistically, I must attend the Saturday evening Mass at my parish and, I believe, should receive Communion with my fellow parishioners. (See CCC #1388).

So, if I follow the advice of many forum posters, I would ignore the liturgical action prescribed by the bishops during the Communion Rite at the prison, and, as leader, decline Communion with the inmates since these LTWWHC are not a “eucharistic celebrations.”

I will pray on it.

Peace,
O’Malley
O’Malley,

Thanks for the further info. That does put things into perspective.
  1. Since you have already attended Sunday Mass (on Sat. evening in the secular calendar) and received Communion there, you aren’t “eligible” to receive a second time on the same liturgical day (Viaticum is an exception, but doesn’t apply). Receiving Communion at Mass takes precedence over any other time. The provision to receive Communion a second time on the same day (canon 917) does not apply. It’s not a matter of receiving with fellow parishioners, it’s a matter of receiving at an actual Mass.
  2. Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest presumes that the entire community is unable to have a priest celebrate Mass, so that’s why the rubric exists that the leader receives Communion at that time. This holds because the instructions themselves apply to a situation where the leader was likewise unable to attend a Mass.
Therefore, you aren’t “ignoring” the instructions to receive Communion when you conduct this service because the instructions themselves don’t apply to your own situation.

Keep in mind that *Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest *requires the explicit permission of the local bishop. Unfortunately, some are under the impression that this is a “service” to be conducted by laypersons whenever a priest is “unavailable”–for the elderly, infirm or imprisoned, for example, but that’s not the case. You might very well have the bishop’s explicit mandate to do this service–I don’t know. If you don’t have that permission, but instead, you’ve been deputed by the local pastor to take Communion to inmates on Sundays, that’s a different situation (perfectly fine, just different), and SCAP shouldn’t be used.

You might have a service of the Word, followed by distribution of Communion, and that will appear to be (for all intents and purposes) identical to SCAP, so that begs the question: What’s the difference? The difference would be the rubric that the leader receives Communion at SCAP–that’s a minor difference, but it is after all, the heart of your original question.

Bottom line: You should receive Communion at Mass on Saturday. You aren’t eligible to receive a second time when you take Communion to the inmates, since the second time isn’t a Mass (aka Eucharistic celebration).

I hope that helps.
 
O’Malley,

…
2. Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest presumes that the entire community is unable to have a priest celebrate Mass, so that’s why the rubric exists that the leader receives Communion at that time. This holds because the instructions themselves apply to a situation where the leader was likewise unable to attend a Mass.

Therefore, you aren’t “ignoring” the instructions to receive Communion when you conduct this service because the instructions themselves don’t apply to your own situation.

Keep in mind that *Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest *requires the explicit permission of the local bishop. Unfortunately, some are under the impression that this is a “service” to be conducted by laypersons whenever a priest is “unavailable”–for the elderly, infirm or imprisoned, for example, but that’s not the case… .
Thanks for your comments. However, I believe the Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest was and still is intended for prison inmates. At least, my bishop and Bishop Francis X. DiLorenzo of Richmond thinks so.

**POLICY OF THE DIOCESE OF RICHMOND
SUNDAY CELEBRATIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF A PRIEST
APPENDIX I
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCAP
MAY SCAP BE USED? CRITERIA:
Maybe: HOME MISSION PARISHES …
.• serves special needs group, e.g. prison population, migrant workers, campus ministry, elderly, etc.
.
STEPS TO TAKE
…
4. invite outside trained leader of prayer
WHICH FORM OF THE RITE?
  1. Liturgy of the Hours – Morning /Evening Prayer (official Prayer of the Church)
  • first option
    …
  • with Communion
  1. Liturgy of the Word
    …
  • with Communion
Diocese of Richmond – Office of Worship
Approved by Bishop Francis X. DiLorenzo – July 12, 2007
Revision Approved - April 2, 2008"**
I have sought out the Director of Liturgy in my diocese for counsel. Pray for more priestly vocations!

Peace,
O’Malley
 
You don’t have to receive at both Liturgies of the Word with Communion. It isn’t like Mass where the Mass isn’t complete if the priest doesn’t consume. You may take communion and the rite tell you how but there is no obligation to do so if you can’t.

As for your logistics, you can receive in your parish on Saturday and receive again on Sunday because that’s two different days. You may only receive once on Sunday though since the second time would not be at Mass.
Thanks, Phemie. But I believe Sundays and days of Solemnity are 32 hour liturgical days that begin at 4PM the evening prior.

Peace,
O’Malley
 
Thanks for your comments. However, I believe the Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest was and still is intended for prison inmates. At least, my bishop and Bishop Francis X. DiLorenzo of Richmond thinks so.

POLICY OF THE DIOCESE OF RICHMOND
SUNDAY CELEBRATIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF A PRIEST
APPENDIX I
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCAP
MAY SCAP BE USED? CRITERIA:
Maybe: HOME MISSION PARISHES …
.• serves special needs group, e.g. prison population
, migrant workers, campus ministry, elderly, etc.
.
STEPS TO TAKE
…
4. invite outside trained leader of prayer
WHICH FORM OF THE RITE?
  1. Liturgy of the Hours – Morning /Evening Prayer (official Prayer of the Church)
  • first option
    …
  • with Communion
  1. Liturgy of the Word
    …
  • with Communion
Diocese of Richmond – Office of Worship
Approved by Bishop Francis X. DiLorenzo – July 12, 2007
Revision Approved - April 2, 2008"
I have sought out the Director of Liturgy in my diocese for counsel. Pray for more priestly vocations!

Peace,
O’Malley
I checked the Richmond Diocese website. The policy does clearly say that the lay leader must be commissioned by the bishop to lead this service (#4)–that’s not an option. If the bishop hasn’t appointed someone to do SCAP then SCAP can’t be used. If the bishop has indeed commissioned you to do this service, then there’s no issue, but if he had, you probably wouldn’t be asking, no? The operative word in the policy with regard to prisons is “maybe.” Yet, “maybe” in the policy still doesn’t mean that one can lead this service w/o the bishop’s explicit commissioning to do so. At the risk of being repetative, only the bishop can determine if SCAP is appropriate, and only he can appoint someone to lead this service.

Do keep in mind though that the service itself presumes that the lay leader is not attending Sunday Mass. The fact that you have already attended Sunday Mass means that you’re an exception to that, so there’s no requirement that you receive Communion at the celebration. Since you’ve already attended Mass once that day, you can’t receive Communion again on the same day; so the canonical prohibition (actually it’s a loosening of the law, because the former law only allowed one Communion, even if the second time would have been at Mass) would still apply, and would “over-rule” the rubric in SCAP to receive at the service.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top