What dear friend, do you find strange about Catholicism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
AMEN.

Now i ask, why do protestants believe this and we have a bit of a problem with ii???

Fran
Becasue GOD did exactly what GOD desired:

One True God

Just One True set of Faith beliefs which my friend you seem to be having diffulcty comprehending:shrug:

And In and Through Just one true Church who ALONE can share the fullness of God’s single Faith beliefs.😊

God Bless you,
 
It’s so nice of you to pray for me to get what I already have!

Sources will be forthcoming from now on since I have thankfully learned to copy and paste and will not have to type so much anymore or try to convince anyone with my pithy words.

Ah. Technology. What a wonderful concept!
What I find Strange given the accuracy of the Bible, is that very very few still consider why we have this all now available 😉 👍

Regards Tony
 
PJM;13478661:
Wannano;13478375:
If I remember, Jesus never offended anyone, even sinners.
He was, however, pretty darn upset with those pharisees, I think.
Oh. And the moneychanges in the court of the Gentiles at the Temple.
Here’s a memory refresher:

Christ “cleaned out the Temple” Mt. 21:11-15; and other places as well. Are we my friend reading the SAME bible?

God Bless you,

Patrick
 
Becasue GOD did exactly what GOD desired:

One True God
Yes God Doeth whatsover He Willeth, history has proven that man always gets the path to that not quite right, but then will spend centuries in denial. This is a strange thing about all Faiths and is not restricted to any one of them.

Regards Tony
 
PJM;13478661:
Wannano;13478375:
An apology prefaced with “if” and followed with a “but” is interesting. My Boss says we must forgive and turn the other cheek so I accept and am again anxious for you to explain how you understand from what I said that I am demanding God to adopt my plan and not His.
I DID:) Just moments ago: Post # 322:thumbsup:

God Bless you,

Patrick
 
People should read Scripture, often!

… and people do, and come to many different interpretations and judgements. Some listen to the Spirit, while others let their desires and ambitions lead their minds.

I have been convicted, after reading Scripture, praying, doing my best to rely on the Spirit to put aside my own will, to obey the leaders of the Church (not just a parish/local/denomination) and allow His Spirit to lead me into the Truth delivered by Him through His Church.

For some, this seems like putting aside the Spirit and Scriptures and trusting in men. I am very opposed to this! No! I will listen to Him in the appointed leaders of His Church. If individuals contradict
what has been written and confirmed by the whole Church, then it may be God putting a challenge to help correct something. But this takes holy devotion to actually help against bad teaching!
CAUTION:D

My friend have you ever been exposed to the One Infallible Rule for right understanding of the Bible? Which BTW is a Catholic Book.

Never Ever; can, may or DOES

One verse, passage or teaching have the power or authority to
Invalidate, make void or override another
Verse, passage or teaching:

Were this even the slightest possibility;[it’s NOT!] it would render the entire Bible useless to teach or lean Christ Faith”

2nd. Peter 1: 16-21 “You will do well to pay attention to this as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. First of all you must understand this,** that no prophecy of scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation**, because no prophecy ever came by the impulse of man, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.”

2nd. Peter 3: 14-17 “Therefore, beloved, since you wait for these, be zealous to be found by him without spot or blemish, and at peace. And count the forbearance of our Lord as salvation. So also our beloved brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, speaking of this as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures. You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, beware lest you be carried away with the error of lawless men and lose your own stability

God Bless you!

Patrick
 
What did the pharisees fail to practice?

They followed all the rules to a “T”. So what it is that they did not practice???

Fran
So eaxtly where did it say they should conspire to KILL JESUS the same Jesus you eariler said Cf. Jesus never did anything to THEM" or some such:shrug:

God Bless you,

Patrick

You can’t have it both way’s
 
I recall reading that Jesus was not opposed to all or even most Pharisees, only the ones who did not understand the true meaning of piety as revealed in the Law, and instead were guilty of false piety.
Right. He didn’t dislike all pharisees. He loved Nicodemus. But he went to speak to Jesus in the evening when it was dark because he probably didn’t want to be seen speaking to Him. The pharisees in Jerusalem were particularly against Jesus because they felt He was going to “dethrone” them. They felt very intimidated by Him but knew He was, somehow, teaching with an authority not seen before. Remember the story of when He got left behind at the Temple at Passover time and He was teaching in the temple? He was only 12!

I’d say that he didn’t care for the ones who were giving the Law to the people putting a big burden on them, instead of relieving their burdens by teaching them about God’s grace and love. Jesus said His yoke was easy and His burden was light - unlike the pharisees’ burden.

See also Mark 7:1-13. He went so far as to say that they invalidated the Word of God with their traditions. Regarding honoring father and mother by taking care of them in their old age and if they didn’t they deserved death - but instead the pharisees were gifting the parent’s money to the temple to corrupt priests who then gave back the money, this was to be freed from the responsibility.

Mark 7:6 This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far away from me.

Jesus was after the heart. If a pharisee loved God with the heart, Jesus did not consider him an enemy of God; otherwise He did. IOW, Jesus is for grace, not Law. (This does not mean we should not follow the Law, but grace gives us the ability to follow it).

Fran
 
Short answer.

It means we should not be legalists, keeping others from approaching God because we lay down so many rules and regulations instead of showing them God’s love for them and letting them serve God out of love and not out of fear of not following the rules.

The Pharisees doled out so many rules to the people that it made them feel like they were sinners and could not approach God. The pharisees wanted to maintain their throne. I’m not saying this is the church. It’s the opposite - it’s some in the church that feel they are doing everything correctly and others cannot “keep up”.

When I was a little girl I was told that all I needed to do was to go to confession and Mass and try to be “good” and I’d go to heaven.

When I got older I realized that this was a very unsatisfactory relationship with God. So I got to know Jesus. I was still in church - I never stopped going to church. But things changed.

So I’m just trying to explain the above. Then posters misunderstand and so accusations abound. Misunderstandings abound. I know the CCC, I know the bible, I’ve read many encyclicals because I’ve had to.

I read here that persons outside the Catholic church are not saved. EENS. From the 300’s. Do YOU believe this has not changed as some on this thread?

Could YOU please read CCC 1271 and then come back and tell me what it means to YOU? Seriously.

I’m replying to you also for others. Not for those who follow me around continually and don’t understand what I’ve stated above. I’m sorry it’s such a difficult concept to grasp - it doesn’t seem like it to me and I do believe the church would agree with my statements.

Fran
P.S. I just said it was a bad verse to use to show that heirarchical religion is good…
QUOTE]It’s my contention that we are saved by Jesus’ sacrifice on he cross not by whether or not we are able to keep all the rules. Which is an idea I’ve encountered here and also in life. It’s a concept that some are just not willing to understand or accept.

So as a “CATHOLIC” you hold to the heresy of OSAS:eek:

Sorry to brreak the news to you; BUT you CAN"T be a “catholic” and hold to this VERY Protestant positioning::tsktsk:

What really scares ME is that I may have missed countermanding some of your “catholic” post.

We ARE delighted you’re here on CAF; BUT in Truth and honesty; you REALLY need to change the name of your religion to Christian and REMOVE “Catholic” as this is a great disservice given you’re position.

The good news though is you have now made my Daily PRAY FOR list:thumbsup:

May God correct and direct you gently!

Patrick
 
What I find Strange given the accuracy of the Bible, is that very very few still consider why we have this all now available 😉 👍

Regards Tony
Can it be for dissemination? Yes. I think so.
 
No. Hierarchy only has one meaning.

You’re right, Jesus was talking about their false piety. Okay. So If they represented the hierarchy of the time, and He was so mad at them (in the next verses) then why use that particular verse to prove Jesus believed in Hierarchy? Jesus didn’t believe in THEIR hierarchy. A govt by priests, a body of officials of different ranks. He said they kept people from God instead of bringing them to God.

He definitely believed in a church, which is why He gave the keys to Peter.

That’s the best explanation I can give of my idea on the verse in Mathew 23:3. I just reread it and I still see it like this. In fact, the heading in my bible is: Pharisaism Exposed.

Thanks for your understanding up above.

Fran
Let me answer you this way

Jesus is upholding their authority correct?
Jesus upholds it even in the face of criticizing them. It seems to me a very strong support of the hierarchy.

Perhaps if I explain it this way you might get what I am saying
Pope Alexander VI was not a very moral pope. I can say that what he taught on faith and morals should be followed but do not follow what he did. I would not be saying I don’t believe in the hierarchy of the Church. The same with Jesus, He was not condemning the hierarchy but the person. The priesthood of the Jews was established by God. I can’t see Jesus disapproving that which His Father instituted.
 
QUOTE]It’s my contention that we are saved by Jesus’ sacrifice on he cross not by whether or not we are able to keep all the rules. Which is an idea I’ve encountered here and also in life. It’s a concept that some are just not willing to understand or accept.
So as a “CATHOLIC” you hold to the heresy of OSAS:eek:
Sorry to brreak the news to you; BUT you CAN"T be a “catholic” and hold to this VERY Protestant positioning::tsktsk:

You are misreading her. What she posted does not equate to osas.
What really scares ME is that I may have missed countermanding some of your “catholic” post.
We ARE delighted you’re here on CAF; BUT in Truth and honesty; you REALLY need to change the name of your religion to Christian and REMOVE “Catholic” as this is a great disservice given you’re position.
The good news though is you have now made my Daily PRAY FOR list:thumbsup:
May God correct and direct you gently!
Wow! Has it occurred to you that you may be misunderstanding.:eek:
 
Wannano;13478375:
PJM;13478262:
REPLY

Posted by Wannano

Perhaps my friend this brief explanation will explain it, And please know that this is not meant personally; rather it is simply God’s own truth.

Clearly, logically and Bionically, Jesus Christ choose to as our One true God had done in the OT. Which is:

Only One true God

With One set of true Faith beliefs

and just One Chosen people which Christ called [not the Jews]; rather “MY CHURCH.”
Mt 16:18

Anyone holding to the views that

ALL Christianity are equally acceptable to God

We ARE ALL “one Body”

or some such understanding is missing a right understanding of God’s Nature & the bibles meaning of “One.”

This teaching By St Paul more than 1,000 years BEFORE the Protestant reformation summarizes God’s singular truth on this topic:

Eph. 4:1-7
I therefore, a prisoner in the Lord, beseech you that you walk worthy of the vocation in which you are called, With all humility and mildness, with patience, supporting one another in charity. Careful to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. [4] One body and one Spirit[MEANS just one Church]; as you are called in one hope of your calling. One Lord, one faith, Means exactly that: Just One set of faith beliefs]one baptism. One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in us all. [7] But to every one of us is given grace, [Here this means for RIGHT understanding] according to the measure of the giving of Christ."

Consequently then all Christian faiths outside of the Catholic Church are to varying degrees actually and factually in competition with Jesus Christ, who accomplished exactly what He set out to do:

Create One New Church; that had His One True faith in its fullness [the exclusive Key to heavens One Gate]

Even God my FRIEND can only have a single set of Faith beliefs
; can only have one right and full, and true understanding of what the Bible actually IS teaching. Which is in great part why “Just One” is Divine Providence. Jesus knowing man’s propensity to “Do MY own thing”; knew well that if He choose “Just One true God, faith and Church”; that man ought to be able to understand that action as BEING His Divine Will.👍

So please don’t take it personally.

I am simply exposing God’s necessarily singular truth.🙂

God Bless you, Pray much!

Patrick

I read strange things from you PJM.
  1. Consequently then all Christian faiths outside of the Catholic Church are to varying degrees actually and factually in competition with Jesus Christ, who accomplished exactly what He set out to do:
Jesus Christ in competition with Himself.
I have no words left to speak.
  1. Even God my FRIEND can only have a single set of Faith beliefs.
GOD has a single set of faith beliefs.
GOD has a single set of faith beliefs.

I still don’t get it. I thought God WAS our faith, our hope, our grace, our justification, our sanctification and, ultimately, our glorification.

ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
 
Short answer.

It means we should not be legalists, keeping others from approaching God because we lay down so many rules and regulations instead of showing them God’s love for them and letting them serve God out of love and not out of fear of not following the rules.

The Pharisees doled out so many rules to the people that it made them feel like they were sinners and could not approach God. The pharisees wanted to maintain their throne. I’m not saying this is the church. It’s the opposite - it’s some in the church that feel they are doing everything correctly and others cannot “keep up”.

It’s my contention that we are saved by Jesus’ sacrifice on he cross not by whether or not we are able to keep all the rules. Which is an idea I’ve encountered here and also in life. It’s a concept that some are just not willing to understand or accept.

When I was a little girl I was told that all I needed to do was to go to confession and Mass and try to be “good” and I’d go to heaven.

When I got older I realized that this was a very unsatisfactory relationship with God. So I got to know Jesus. I was still in church - I never stopped going to church. But things changed.

So I’m just trying to explain the above. Then posters misunderstand and so accusations abound. Misunderstandings abound. I know the CCC, I know the bible, I’ve read many encyclicals because I’ve had to.

I read here that persons outside the Catholic church are not saved. EENS. From the 300’s. Do YOU believe this has not changed as some on this thread?

Could YOU please read CCC 1271 and then come back and tell me what it means to YOU? Seriously.

I’m replying to you also for others. Not for those who follow me around continually and don’t understand what I’ve stated above. I’m sorry it’s such a difficult concept to grasp - it doesn’t seem like it to me and I do believe the church would agree with my statements.

Fran
P.S. I just said it was a bad verse to use to show that heirarchical religion is good…
My reply:

CCC #1271 Baptism constitutes the foundation of communion among all Christians, including those** who are not yet in full communion with the Catholic Church**: “For men who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in some, though imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church. Justified by faith in Baptism, [they] are incorporated into Christ;** they therefore have a right to be called Christians**, and with good reason are accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church.” “Baptism therefore constitutes the sacramental bond of unity existing among all who through it are reborn.”

They have a right to be called ‘Christian’s’ NOT Catholics

They are to differing degrees NOT in “communion”; which means they still hold on to their versions of Christ One TRUE set of faith beliefs.

And Yes and Certainly we ARE Brethren THROUGH Baptism with water & the Holy Spirit: John 3 & Mt. 28: 18-19… but this is NOT saying; implying OR Teaching that we are ALL Equal in God’s view. Such is a practical, and a Moral IMPOSSIBILITY:shrug:

We should love them, BUT NOT allow THEM to didcate God’s version of their truth and at best incomplete; and often just wrong faith beliefs. Which MY FRIEND you seem to have done:eek:

God Bless you,

Patrick
 
Can it be for dissemination? Yes. I think so.
Dear Fran, you have considered why the web technology is available and it is great for dissemination, my remark is how and why it became available for this. 😉

This is the Strange things about what we all come to beleive. We use a Frame of Reference much like looking out a windo at a view. If we do not venture outside we will only see the view through the window Frame. God outside and the Frame is our extent of vision. Go on to a mountain and it expands again, go up in a rocket and a universe is seen. etc etc

Regards Tony
 
My reply:

CCC #1271 Baptism constitutes the foundation of communion among all Christians, including those** who are not yet in full communion with the Catholic Church**: “For men who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in some, though imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church. Justified by faith in Baptism, [they] are incorporated into Christ;** they therefore have a right to be called Christians**, and with good reason are accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church.” “Baptism therefore constitutes the sacramental bond of unity existing among all who through it are reborn.”

They have a right to be called ‘Christian’s’ NOT Catholics

They are to differing degrees NOT in “communion”; which means they still hold on to their versions of Christ One TRUE set of faith beliefs.

And Yes and Certainly we ARE Brethren THROUGH Baptism with water & the Holy Spirit: John 3 & Mt. 28: 18-19… but this is NOT saying; implying OR Teaching that we are ALL Equal in God’s view. Such is a practical, and a Moral IMPOSSIBILITY:shrug:

We should love them, BUT NOT allow THEM to didcate God’s version of their truth and at best incomplete; and often just wrong faith beliefs. Which MY FRIEND you seem to have done:eek:

God Bless you,

Patrick
PJM,
I wasn’t asking you to read 1271 and give me your view.

But, by golly, you certainly have.

So the ones outside the catholic church have the right to be called CHRISTian but not Catholic. We are not equal. I guess when we get to the pearly gates all the catholics will go to the left and all the “christians” will go to the right.

Funny, I though catholics were christians. Ah. But christians are not catholics. I see. It’s statements such as these that make “christians” believe catholics are not christian.

Yeah. I’m confused too. And to think that Jesus made everything so simple…

Do you read your posts??

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
 
Originally Posted by frangiuliano115 View Post
Ooops. I forgot that I was going to copy and paste the CCC from now on:
Regarding my post no. 311
in which I state that even non catholics, or those outside the church
are saved:

Good for you Fran! Sources are always helpful. I will fervently pray that the Holy Spirit will deeply impress these truths upon your heart, and that you will be able to accept what they say. I look forward to the time when you will stop posting contradictions to the Teaching of the Catholic Church on CAF. It is my prayerful hope that you will soon fully and finally accept that these passages refer to people who are joined to the Body of Christ, and are not “outside”. 👍
MY REPLY to FRan along with guanophore: above

A few post ago Fran you begin with
“Here’s the rest of the Story”

And that starting point works for me too:)

CCC# 1260 & 1271 ARE Incomplete CATHOLIC Teachings when culled and seperated from The REST of THEE Thruth

CCC 846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.

CCC #847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.

What you’re not grasping is that truth is singular; AND along with the key’s [all of them] to heaven’s gate; ARE entrusted by Christ to His Catholic Church.

My friend, you would be extremely well advised to speak to a Catholic Priest on your understandings.

God Bless you,
Patrick
 
Dear Fran, you have considered why the web technology is available and it is great for dissemination, my remark is how and why it became available for this. 😉

This is the Strange things about what we all come to beleive. We use a Frame of Reference much like looking out a windo at a view. If we do not venture outside we will only see the view through the window Frame. God outside and the Frame is our extent of vision. Go on to a mountain and it expands again, go up in a rocket and a universe is seen. etc etc

Regards Tony
To see forever further to the one Source.
 
Originally Posted by frangiuliano115 View Post
Ooops. I forgot that I was going to copy and paste the CCC from now on:
CCC #847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.

What you’re not grasping is that truth is singular; AND along with the key’s [all of them] to heaven’s gate; ARE entrusted by Christ to His Catholic Church.

My friend, you would be extremely well advised to speak to a Catholic Priest on your understandings.

God Bless you,
Patrick

I’ll be seeing Don Giovanni tomorrow evening for weekly bible study.

I’ll give him your regards.

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
[/QUOTE]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top