No, but I doubt he would have accepted “Some Catholics do” as a counter-argument. Oh, and his other main argument was that Catholics don’t know how to answer the question “Do you know Jesus personally?” and therefore aren’t Christian.
Well, first of all, it is important to note that what your friend is saying are claims, NOT arguments. An argument has some sort of supporting reasoning behind it, or at least a logical connection between premise and conclusion. Your friend has not provided this. Hence, it is a claim without evidence, not an argument. You should ask your friend for evidence of or a supporting argument for his claims. Also be prepared for counter evidence.
He says that Catholics don’t read the bible. Ask him for evidence of this notion. Then, provide evidence that Catholics do read the bible. I would also follow it up by asking him to explain his reasoning - what, exactly, is it about the state of not reading the bible makes one a non-Christian? Are the illiterate non-Christians because they can’t read the bible? What about blind people or little children? They can’t read the bible. And what about a prisoner in, say, China, sent to prison for practicing his faith too openly and while in prison, not being allowed a bible. If he is caught reading one, he is tortured, so he doesn’t. Is he a non-Christian for choosing not to read the bible?
His reasoning is a logical disconnect. You go from step A to B then to C, etc. Your friend has gone from step A straight to step X without even thinking about how to connect A to X or even if there is a connection at all.
Likewise with the claim that Catholics don’t know how to answer the question of do we know Jesus personally. Ask him for evidence of this. Show him evidence to the contrary. You should know how to answer the question - a most emphatic ‘yes!’ Then ask him to explain his reasoning, just like above.