What DID people eat -- pre-Vatican II Lent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loud-living-dogma
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Before Vatican II, abstinence from meat was only mandated on Ash Wednesday and Fridays, including during Lent.

Meat was allowed on the other days during Lent.

Jim
 
Okay I think I am getting different eras mixed up. Thanks everyone for the comments and clarifications!
 
Interesting. There are certain days where fish is permitted but not once you’re a certain number of days into Lent… it’s possible some jurisdictions relax the rules.
 
40.png
Loud-living-dogma:
So, I know what Catholics were not allowed to eat in Lent (roughly pre-Vatican II), i.e. no meat, eggs, dairy, but what did they actually eat? A whole lot of pea soup? Bread? Potatoes? Beans and rice? It’s not like most people would eat fish / seafood daily, right? I guess in some regions they might.
As a general rule whatever is deemed necessary in order to enable people to give proper attention to their duties may be taken at the collation. Moreover, since custom first introduced the collation, the usage of each country must be considered in determining the quality of viands permitted thereat. In some places eggs, milk, butter, cheese and fish are prohibited, while bread, cake, fruit, herbs and vegetables are allowed. In other places, milk, eggs, cheese, butter and fish are permitted, owing either to custom or to Indult.
O’Neill, J.D. (1909). Fast. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05789c.htm
That’s a good source for the history of fasting in the Church.

A few points to keep in mind:

That article pre-dates the 1917 Code of Canon Law. At the time it was written, there was no universal code. That’s why we read about so much diversity in fasting laws.

People are going to have different memories of fasting based on their own family traditions, themselves based on their own ethnic traditions. So we’re going to see a lot of diversity.
 
So, I know what Catholics were not allowed to eat in Lent (roughly pre-Vatican II), i.e. no meat, eggs, dairy, but what did they actually eat? A whole lot of pea soup? Bread? Potatoes? Beans and rice? It’s not like most people would eat fish / seafood daily, right? I guess in some regions they might.
I found this webpage

https://fastlikeits1917.com/make-the-old-new-again/

It explains the fasting laws under the 1917 Code of Canon Law. It does a pretty good job of that.

Notice: I am posting this link for purely educational purposes. The 1917 Code has been abrogated. We are bound only by the 1983 Code. The webpage itself is posted merely as a suggestion—whoever wrote the page is not advocating ignoring the 1983 Code. In no way am I trying to imply that the old code is binding on anyone. Again, to be clear: educational purposes only. Whoever wrote the page provides several links to Vatican webpages, so they are not some sedevacante movement.
 
Interesting. There are certain days where fish is permitted but not once you’re a certain number of days into Lent… it’s possible some jurisdictions relax the rules.
According to the strictest observance, fish is permitted only on Annunciation and Palm Sunday. Adherence varies widely among individuals, jurisdiction, and ethnic tradition. My parish has a Lazarus Saturday (the day before Palm Sunday) Fish Fry.
 
So even though Sundays are traditionally “little Easters,” the strictest rules of fast and abstinence applied to those also?
 
The thing with rabbits is that they occupy a key position within the food chain. They are a primary source of meat for most predators, whenever rabbit populations dwindle all the carnivores dwindle with them. Rabbits reproduce all year round in great numbers and are herbivores, so they keep all the carnivores fed like snakes, wolves, eagles, foxes and, of course, bears…🤣
 
Thanks for that - - very enlightening!
 
Last edited:
People raise rabbits for their meat. Just as they raise chickens for their eggs AND their meat.
 
Yes I know, but I was thinking back in those days (and up until recently) rabbits were so abundant you could see them everywhere. Most people hunted rabbits one way or the other. And most people I know ate rabbits without actually keeping rabbits. Contrary to chickens which were always raised at home.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top