X
XiWang717
Guest
I am simply wondering…what do most of you think when you think about China? Is your opinion generally positive, negative, or neither?
Egg Rolls! Posative ++++I am simply wondering…what do most of you think when you think about China? Is your opinion generally positive, negative, or neither?
I have a very positive opinion of China. China is an ancient land and culture and so has a real substance to it which many countries formed only recently can never have. I think Chinese culture is beautiful, but in some ways is inaccessible to the typical westerner (given the stark differences between languages etc).I am simply wondering…what do most of you think when you think about China? Is your opinion generally positive, negative, or neither?
Most westerners don’t understand China and the was it functions. China is not a democratic country, and never has been one. It’s simply part of the culture.I have a negative opinion of China. I believe the government there disrespects the Pope by not allowing him to choose the Bishops in China. They consider the Pope to be tyrannical, which is absurd. Also, the people of China should have the courage to stand together against that government which is oppressive to the people. It’s a shame in my opinion.
It means we are indebted to them, so they have the right to demand things from us. But we have a strong military so we will not give them what they demand… In other words, we are crooks.Oh yeah, I forgot. Don’t they own like most of our debt too? LIke a huge ammt of our debt? We are the most indebted country in the world, I think China might fall on the other end of the spectrum. Not sure what that means for our future, political or otherwise. When I’ve mentioned it in conversation, more than once I’ve gotten the reply “Yeah, but we have the strongest military with all the guns, etc”… not sure what to make of that…
That is a difficult issue. Here is what I will say - the main reason why most Chinese tolerate the Chinese government is simply because they do not feel the great need not to. They do not really see in everyday life the “evils” as some of you say, of the Chinese government, and they simply become content with working to earn a living, day by day, year by year. Understand that conditions in China are still poor compared to the West, and that only around 38% of all Chinese even have access to the Internet.I have a negative opinion of China. I believe the government there disrespects the Pope by not allowing him to choose the Bishops in China. They consider the Pope to be tyrannical, which is absurd. Also, the people of China should have the courage to stand together against that government which is oppressive to the people. It’s a shame in my opinion.
With all due respect Mr. Wang, I do believe your father is a good man, and has done very good things and I respect you for coming here and creating this dialogue. But when you speak of “idolizing” Mao, that strikes be as being counter-productive in terms of progress. Progress in a Catholic sense means uniting all of mankind under the One and only true God of us all, which extends beyond politics and nations. Progress means standing up for what our creator expects from us, and not settling for anything less. So when the Chinese people accept what’s given to them because it comes from them, that is the point when I become confused because as a human race, we should be united in universal truths that extend beyond this world, and remaining in a paradigm of nationality first -religion second, we lose this universal covenant with each other.That is a difficult issue. Here is what I will say - the main reason why most Chinese tolerate the Chinese government is simply because they do not feel the great need not to. They do not really see in everyday life the “evils” as some of you say, of the Chinese government, and they simply become content with working to earn a living, day by day, year by year. Understand that conditions in China are still poor compared to the West, and that only around 38% of all Chinese even have access to the Internet.
My father grew up in a small rural village still reeling from the effects of the Japanese invasion, and his parents earned their living largely due to farming; my father’s younger brother died at the age of eleven because the medical treatment was too poor at the time. And yet, my father rose through his own efforts, reading and studying intensely, to attend one of the top universities in China at the time and become a diplomat for the Foreign Ministry, visiting various nations and meeting with many heads of state, including several American Presidents, to further rise until he earned himself a position within international organizations.
The Chinese, including my own parents, especially my father, idolize Mao because he is seen as a cultural “savior”, almost worthy of worship, due to his contribution to what can be seen as the modernization of China. Arguably, the Vatican itself a semi-political body, and as such, some see the Pope as foreign interference in Chinese political affairs.
You know, I am not necessarily saying that I support all aspects of communism, but it is to my belief that the doctrine originated in the West, not China. As I have said, the situation is difficult, and I am not trying to defend any ideology. But without communism, where would China be today?With all due respect Mr. Wang, I do believe your father is a good man, and has done very good things and I respect you for coming here and creating this dialogue. But when you speak of “idolizing” Mao, that strikes be as being counter-productive in terms of progress. Progress in a Catholic sense means uniting all of mankind under the One and only true God of us all, which extends beyond politics and nations. Progress means standing up for what our creator expects from us, and not settling for anything less. So when the Chinese people accept what’s given to them because it comes from them, that is the point when I become confused because as a human race, we should be united in universal truths that extend beyond this world, and remaining in a paradigm of nationality first -religion second, we lose this universal covenant with each other.
Of course, I’m an American so I have no concept of what it means to be embraced by people who are all of similar culture and race. Here, we’re all mixed and multi-cultural. I hope I haven’t overstepped my boundaries here and I certainly mean no disrespect towards the Chinese people in general, I just don’t quite understand.
It actually is counterproductive to demonize the “idols” of others. Even the Church doesn’t do that with respect to other religions it considers false. Doing so simply cuts off dialogue at the outset.With all due respect Mr. Wang, I do believe your father is a good man, and has done very good things and I respect you for coming here and creating this dialogue. But when you speak of “idolizing” Mao, that strikes be as being counter-productive in terms of progress.
It is imperative that having dialogue at the ambassador level the party making the contact understand the culture and the people. Countries like China are very different and very much older than our own, and we can’t expect them to accept things the way we do. Long term and friendly dialogue is the only way to attempt understanding of our religious beliefs.Of course, I’m an American so I have no concept of what it means to be embraced by people who are all of similar culture and race. Here, we’re all mixed and multi-cultural. I hope I haven’t overstepped my boundaries here and I certainly mean no disrespect towards the Chinese people in general, I just don’t quite understand.