What do Christians consider as scripture?

  • Thread starter Thread starter peace_at_last
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know Christians consider the NT as scripture. But what about the OT? I’m getting the impression that people Chery pick sections from the OT where it suits them but reject it when it doesn’t. So what is the deal here? What is regarded as scripture and what isn’t?
As has been stated, the Catholic Church considers the OT to be part of Scripture. Even those parts which are unpleasant. Catholics, I have found, don’t quote a lot from the OT, since we focus mainly on the NT. But I’d like to mention that there’s are quotes from the OT given at every Mass, every day. The first and second readings at Mass are usually from the OT - often from the Psalms.

I have a copy of an older missal which was in use before 1962. Missals provide a Catholic with the form how the Mass proceeds, and also gives the readings, which change daily, so that they can follow along, or read them ahead of time. In addition to the daily readings, the old missal gives a very long and thorough description of the meaning attached to that particular Sunday, according to tradition. Here’s an example of one description that the missal gives for the Twelfth Sunday after Pentacost (about August 1st on the old calendar), which describes the proverbs of Soloman, and how he was a type of Christ. The readings from this time of the calendar up to Advent mostly concern the OT prophets:

Twelfth Sunday After Pentacost:

To-day if this is Sunday is the nearest to August 1st the Church begins to read in the divine office the proverbs of Soloman.
These proverbs are useful “to know wisdom and instruction, to understand the words of prudence; and to receive the instruction of doctrine, and justice, and judgment and equity: to give subtilty to little ones, to the young man knowledge and understanding” (1st nocturne).
Soloman was only a type of Christ, the Incarnate wisdom, as indeed, we read in today’s Gospel: “Blessed are ye which see the things that you see. For I say to you that many prophets and kings have desired to see the things that you see, and have not seen them; and to hear the things that you hear and have not heard them.” “Blessed,” says St. Bede, "are the eyes that can recognize the mysteries of the Lord; of whom it is said, ‘thou hast revealed it to the little ones.’ " Blessed are the eyes of these little ones, to whom the Son has vouchsafed to reveal Himself and the Father. Here is a doctor of the law who, tempting Our Lord, asks Him questions about eternal life (Gospel). But the snare that he spread for Jesus Christ shows how true were the words our Redeemer has just uttered, when He said to His Father: “Thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent and hast revealed them to the little ones.”
“The fear of the Lord,” says Soloman, “is the beginning of wisdom…If sinners shall entice thee consent not to them. If they shall say: ‘Come with us, let us hide snares for the innocent without cause: let us swallow him up alive like hell, and whole as one who goeth down into the pit. We shall find all precious substance: we shall fill our houses with spoils.’ My son, walk not with them: restrain thy foot from their paths. For their feet run to evil and make hast to shed blood. So the ways of every covetous man destroy the souls of the possessors.”
It was thus that the demon acted with regard to the first man, for when Adam fell into sin they stripped him of all his goods and covered him with wounds. For original sin deprives man of all the gifts of grace and wounds him in his very nature. His intelligence is less alert and his will weaker, for the concupiscence which reigns in his members carries him toward evil. To make him feel his impotence, for as St. Paul says, our sufficiency is from God (Epistle), almighty God instituted the Mosaic Law which gave him the commandments that faith enabled him to fulfill, but without supplying the sacramental help we enjoy in the New Dispensation.
Thus man, understanding that he needs the divine assistance in order to be healed, to will what is good, to obtain it and to persevere in it to the end, looks to heaven and cries: “Incline unto my aid, O God: O Lord, make haste to help me…”

There’s quite a bit more that’s written, but the above should suffice to show that there’s good reference to the OT in Catholicism.
 
I’m not an expert in Islam, but I wonder if there is a fundamental difference in what Scripture is considered to BE between Christianity and Islam.

Catholicism understands Scripture to be the divinely inspired record of how God gradually revealed Himself to mankind. That is the purpose of Scripture. We do NOT consider it to be primarily a summation of divine commands intended to eternally serve as the sole (or even primary) source of determining right from wrong. It’s the story of a relationship between God and man more than a reference book. That story DOES reveal much that is useful for reference, but because that isn’t it’s primary purpose, it can be misapplied and incorrect conclusions drawn from sloppy exegesis.

Catholics understand God to be beyond our complete understanding, but not to be utterly inscrutable. We understand God to have revealed aspects of His character over the course of history as shown in Scripture by which we are able to understand the principles of goodness and also understand that principles in conflict with God’s character are evil.

I’m not sure how Islam understands the Koran, but the above is why it is NOT “cherry picking” for Christians to repudiate the practice of stoning adulterers to death (for example). Yes, it’s clearly an acceptable practice in the OT, but from the WHOLE of Scripture, we come to see that what God really wants is repentance, not punishment.

Hopefully that makes some sense and hopefully you’ll help us understand how muslims view the Koran and how you understand it’s purpose.
 
For what it’s worth, Protestants agree with what Catholic posters have said on this thread. The Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) foreshadows the New Testament. For example, the Temple sacrifices and shedding of blood of the lamb for the sins of the people look forward to Christ’s perfect sacrifice on the Cross. He is the Lamb that was slain for our sins. Therefore, the Jewish ceremonial and ritual laws were fulfilled in Christ. The legal matter applied to the Kingdom of Israel, and Christians are not obligated to reproduce the ancient Israelite legal system today. The moral and ethical teachings continue to apply to Christians, and in the New Testament, we see them perfected in Jesus’ life and teachings.
And the family had to eat the Lamb, and not just a symbol of the Lamb. 😛

Great post! 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top