6
6glargento
Guest
i have heard on other threads that jews and muslims have been ranting to benedict XVI over the content of the TLM, what is so offensive to them about it?
Well, as if most of them care… but I think the upsetting thing to the ones who bother following our liturgical practice is that the TLM minces no words in letting people know the Jews and Muslims are wrong. People can debate whether words like “blindness” are the most charitable way of going about it, but certain groups would be offended by a clear reference to our belief in their need for conversion no matter how nicely we put it across.i have heard on other threads that jews and muslims have been ranting to benedict XVI over the content of the TLM, what is so offensive to them about it?
My understanding is that the term “perfidis Judaeis–unfaithful Jews” was removed in the 1962 revision; you have to go back to something prior to 1962 to find it.On Good Friday, the Tridentine liturgy calls for the conversion of the “perfidious Jews”. On the last Sunday after Pentecost, the tridentine mass calls for conversion to those in the “darkness of Islamism”.
Should we CARE what heretics and heathens think of our Liturgy?I don’t think its the Latin mass in general that some Jews and Muslims have raised objections to.
Its the liturgy in the Tridentine missal for certain days that are being complained about as insensitive.
On Good Friday, the Tridentine liturgy calls for the conversion of the “perfidious Jews”. On the last Sunday after Pentecost, the tridentine mass calls for conversion to those in the “darkness of Islamism”.
There might be a few other phrases which raise the ire, but those are two of the biggest bees in the bonnet of some Jewish and Muslim activists.
Presuming that’s true(I assume you’re right on this), I don’t know if the distinction as to what year’s missal the phrase is included in makes that much difference to the activists that are complaining about it.My understanding is that the term “perfidis Judaeis–unfaithful Jews” was removed in the 1962 revision; you have to go back to something prior to 1962 to find it.
I was only trying to answer the question as to why they are offended, not whether anyone should care if they are offended.Should we CARE what heretics and heathens think of our Liturgy?
I for one do not.
.
I am another that does not care. When the Muslim countries stop persecuting Christians in their own country then it is time to start worrying about how we offend them.I was only trying to answer the question as to why they are offended, not whether anyone should care if they are offended.
I believe it just has “The Conversion” of the Jews.Should we CARE what heretics and heathens think of our Liturgy?
I for one do not.
By the way, ‘Perfidious Jews’ was taken out of the Good Friday bidding prayers in the late 50’s I believe, so it is not in the Missal of 1962.
Who cares?i have heard on other threads that jews and muslims have been ranting to benedict XVI over the content of the TLM, what is so offensive to them about it?
The changes made gave a false impression of understanding, respect and tolerance towards others. It is far better for everyone to show the true side of Catholicism.Should we CARE what heretics and heathens think of our Liturgy?
I for one do not.
By the way, ‘Perfidious Jews’ was taken out of the Good Friday bidding prayers in the late 50’s I believe, so it is not in the Missal of 1962.
Praying for conversions is an important aspect of Catholicism, though. That is one of our traditions. We should not have to change the wording of our Mass to pacify another religion or group of people.The changes made gave a false impression of understanding, respect and tolerance towards others. It is far better for everyone to show the true side of Catholicism.
Seems as if the Lutherans, the Orthodox Church, and Anglicans feel the same way. Tough balancing act to say the least.The changes made gave a false impression of understanding, respect and tolerance towards others. It is far better for everyone to show the true side of Catholicism.
More than two, really, if every dissenter group can consider itself a “Church of Christ” church “SUBSISTING” in the “catholic” religion.there are 2 “Church of Christ” churches “SUBSISTING” in the “catholic” religion.