S
Sqrl
Guest
Consider the falls of Satan, Eve/Adam, Noah’s contemporaries, Moses, David, so many others in biblical record, and most significantly, the Christ. While these (save the last) may have been creatures, they represent an acknowledged history of God failing.
Jesus told his Hebrew followers that he came to the house of Israel. Yet he failed, as God in flesh on Earth, to lead that house, having just less than a thousand or so follow him and only a handful come to know the Truth. He may have blessed a few gentiles, but that was not His stated mission. Even awesome works/signs wrought by the Holy Spirit did not bring Israelites (in the main) to recognize having experienced God having been their human contemporary. One Jew, Saul of Tarsus, reframed the gospel message “disciples of all nations” and became Paul, apostle to the gentiles. The argument in council occurred, one supposes, because Jesus failed to make that univeral outreach clear?
So what does the repeated failure of God, omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, to accomplish His [stated or implied] purpose tell us? It’s been millenia and we still see the bulk of our world unwilling to accept God for Who He is. What are we to learn from this history of christian theology?
I ask, for I believe. This is a challenge to my reasoning, not to my faith. Philosophy (“search for truth”) fears no question; faith (“realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen”) fears no truth.
Jesus told his Hebrew followers that he came to the house of Israel. Yet he failed, as God in flesh on Earth, to lead that house, having just less than a thousand or so follow him and only a handful come to know the Truth. He may have blessed a few gentiles, but that was not His stated mission. Even awesome works/signs wrought by the Holy Spirit did not bring Israelites (in the main) to recognize having experienced God having been their human contemporary. One Jew, Saul of Tarsus, reframed the gospel message “disciples of all nations” and became Paul, apostle to the gentiles. The argument in council occurred, one supposes, because Jesus failed to make that univeral outreach clear?
So what does the repeated failure of God, omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, to accomplish His [stated or implied] purpose tell us? It’s been millenia and we still see the bulk of our world unwilling to accept God for Who He is. What are we to learn from this history of christian theology?
I ask, for I believe. This is a challenge to my reasoning, not to my faith. Philosophy (“search for truth”) fears no question; faith (“realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen”) fears no truth.
Last edited: