Well, first off, this whole issue sounds like a mountain out of a molehill. This was an off-hand remark made by a single person, and might I add a very badly chosen parallel, but is in NO way representitive of the LDS Church as whole, or probably any other members either.
I’ve been a member of the LDS church for the last 24 years and am now taking the catechism and learning more about the Catholic faith BUT I still hold the LDS church in great respect.
I’m chainging churches due to personal beliefs but I still hold the LDS church with the highest of respect, but once I started learning about the Catholic church, I find that they believe the exact same thing that I disagreed with in the Mormon church.
When I joined, I too was confused about the lack of any iconography in the church, and when asked about it, the man I asked said simply “Well, it would be like wearing a little electric chair around your neck. Personally, I would rather have a necklace showing the tomb with the stone rolled back”.
While I agree that this makes sense, the symbol of the cross or crucifix is a REMINDER of what Christ suffered for our sins, and should not in and of it’s-self become venerated, otherwise you are then bowing down to a graven image. For the last 15 years I’ve worn a small gold cross on the lapel of my suit, and I’m a greeter (stand at the door and hand out the bulletins, shake hands, corral kids during services etc).
Kissing the feet of Christ is not IMO venerating the object it’s-self, but merely showing devotion for whom the object represents. The object is still just an object, it can be destroyed, desecrated, stolen or otherwise lost but the man for whom this represents will still be with us.
Now on the subject of the Swastika, it was, prior to WW-2, considered a Good Luck symbol (most likely the reason Hitler chose it, he was VERY superstitious). Even the Boy Scouts of America employed the symbol on the award medals they handed out, but Hitler tainted this image when he chose it as a symbol of his oppresive and murderous regime. The problem is, that this association with the third riech has become so strong, that most folks today are somewhat surprised to learn that it was not actually invented by Hitler himself, but rather had a life of it’s own and totally different meaning prior to his regiem.
It’s rather like the word Gay. It used to mean happy and carefree, but our society has changed it’s meaning to “homosexual”. Am I Gay? Sure! It’s a nice day out! Am I Homosexual? Nope, Sorry fellas.