What do you think about guitars during mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fish90
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
One other thing to point out, though, is that the composers who purposely took secular folk melodies or other kinds of secular melodies and turned them into either hymns, incorporated the melody into larger, secular orchestral works, art songs, etc, often times did not mean for the music to sound exactly like the original or to be performed like the original. It was meant to have a different “feel”. Some might have just liked the melody, itself, and wanted to use it for an “expanded” idea of the melody, or might have wanted to incorporate the melody into their orchestral composition to give homage to the beauties and strengths of his/her country, etc.

In regards to hymn melodies taken to be arranged for organ in certain compositions, I think especially in the past, composers understood or tried to adhere to the reasoning of “refining” the music for liturgical use. It could not sound secular. If Vaughn-Williams (who I personally believe was a great composer and did some really beautiful adapatations of folk melodies) for instance, kept the original rendering of the melody to “For All the Saints”, it probably would not have been accepted for use at mass or service - whether or not it was for an Anglican mass or Catholic mass. It had to sound different from what one would hear outside of church.

For most adaptations, I personally can appreciate the original form as well as the adapted form if it is well done. But I appreciate them in different ways and take them for what they were meant to evoke. I love old folk melodies in their original forms, but also love singing them in art songs. Britten has such an extensive collection of folk song arrangements and they are some of my favorites to perform. The same with taking of folk melodies and translating them to piano works, orchestral works, or adapting and refining them to sacred texts.

I will agree, though, that with “For All the Saints”, I have a tendency to want to take faster than how it is usually played. Although, when you hear one of those English choirs or even a congregation singing it full-voice with the organ supporting it, it’s like nothing else. That said, the Slane Irish folk melody and Kingsfold English melody (which Vaughn-Williams also did a lovely adaptation of) are both melodies which I love sung slower when set to religious text. And I love the organ adaptations to them, especially when played well. Brides have often used the Slane melody set to the “Lord of All Hopefulness” hymn for their processional and when my organist friend plays it on the organ, it sounds so beautiful and majestic, it brings tears to my eyes.

In their respective realms, depending on whether or not they are meant to be played like a folk song or a more reverent, spiritual way, the tempi taken are both great. I once used the Slane melody for my students to demonstrate how different a work can sound just by changing the tempo and making one sound more like a “jig” and then basing it on the text set to it, changing the whole feel of the piece by slowing the tempo, creating more legato. Of course, when played like a folk song, the kids were laughing and wanting to dance, etc - which is what would be expected. It sounds like a fun, secular piece of music. For the second example of the melody, though, they enjoyed it just as much, but in a different way. The hymn actually became one of the kids favorites to sing.
Understood and mostly agreed … but sometimes folk tune re-use doesn’t work because the tune resists being reshaped and you have to look at its origins to understand why. They don’t always survive when put through the Church Filter, and the end result is a formerly-great little tune turned into bad music, no matter how correctly the four-part cadences are harmonised. If it just doesn’t work once it’s made “acceptable” in church, I’d rather not persist with it personally.

I like most of Britten’s re-workings and think they are more successful than many others’ attempts at same, but I am more sensitive than many others to what “works” in this field and what doesn’t. I heard too many Brunnhildes shrieking their way through re-set folk tunes when I was a kid, with everyone telling me this was Good Music because Well Trained Classical Musicians were performing it and this was therefore a Great Improvement over results achieved by Ignorant Aural Tradition Musicians … and I never bought it. I am sure your renditions of art song versions are lovely, though,and thankfully we seem to have gotten over the stage where A Trained Singer thought they could sing anything they felt like and get away with it.
 
Understood and mostly agreed … but sometimes folk tune re-use doesn’t work because the tune resists being reshaped and you have to look at its origins to understand why. They don’t always survive when put through the Church Filter, and the end result is a formerly-great little tune turned into bad music, no matter how correctly the four-part cadences are harmonised. If it just doesn’t work once it’s made “acceptable” in church, I’d rather not persist with it personally.

I like most of Britten’s re-workings and think they are more successful than many others’ attempts at same, but I am more sensitive than many others to what “works” in this field and what doesn’t. I heard too many Brunnhildes shrieking their way through re-set folk tunes when I was a kid, with everyone telling me this was Good Music because Well Trained Classical Musicians were performing it and this was therefore a Great Improvement over results achieved by Ignorant Aural Tradition Musicians … and I never bought it.
Agreed. I actually do not like hearing larger, Wagnerian-type voices doing art-song adaptaptions of English folk songs. (Although I do enjoy their other art song performances.) I’d rather hear someone like Ellie Ameling, Julianne Baird or Arleen Auger do them.
I am sure your renditions of art song versions are lovely, though,and thankfully we seem to have gotten over the stage where A Trained Singer thought they could sing anything they felt like and get away with it.
Haha! I think people learned their lesson when they heard Micheal Bolton sing his rendition of “Nessun Dorma” or “Barbara Streisand” sing her versions of operatic arias. At least she had operatic training prior to becoming star, but still, I believe once your voice is set in a certain style, it’s hard to break. Christen Chenowith, although her voice is sweet for what she does, doesn’t have the power or chops for opera anymore. I’ve heard her and was not impressed with it. A good friend of my loves her and she’ll argue to the bone that she’s just as good, but she isn’t a singer and doesn’t really know the difference between what a good opera singer who has made a career in any kind of fach sounds like and someone who studied it, but didn’t pursue it after the age of 20/25 sounds like and has placed all of her focus on Broadway. I can’t even stand hearing Charlotte Church or any of the Celtic Women singers do operatic arias.

The same is true with when opera singers try to do the same. Renee Fleming - opera singer. She sounds incredible with Strauss, Mozart, etc., but I absolutely cannot stand it when she sings Broadway tunes. I’ve heard her live about 3 times and the last time, I was totally disappointed. She did these Broadway tunes and it sounded ridiculous. She talked about how she loved doing them as well as jazz when she was younger. When her voice wasn’t totally developed for opera, I’m sure she sounded great, but it was just way too operatic. Kiri Te Kanewa - one of my favorites. She put out an album singing traditional Maori songs from her native New Zealand, but I didn’t like it. Jessye Norman - another one of my favorites. Did an album with jazz/bluesy kinds of music. I listened to it in the store and did not like it.
 
Jessye Norman - another one of my favorites. Did an album with jazz/bluesy kinds of music. I listened to it in the store and did not like it.
I love her Richard Strauss’s Four Last Songs.

Her “Amazing Grace” has me running down the road screaming to get away from it.

Off topic, sorry. :o

Well, not so off topic, maybe - it’s about what actually works and what doesn’t, in spite of what we are “told” is “objectively” good and bad.
 
I love her Richard Strauss’s Four Last Songs.
TOTALLY AGREE!!! She is one of my favorites for his Four Last Songs as well as practically anything else R. Strauss composed.
Her “Amazing Grace” has me running down the road screaming to get away from it.
I have to admit, I’ve never heard her “Amazing Grace”, but a few years back she did a recital, which I unfortunately could not make. A group of my friends did go, though, and they ranged from around my age in their 20s to people in their 40s/50s. Her encore was “Amazing Grace” and she did it a capella. Apparently, it was so moving you could hear a pin drop and tears were flowing down people’s faces througout the place. My friends said, that you would never think that something like “Amazing Grace” would have been the highlight of the evening, especially with what Ms. Norman can sing, but she sang it with so much depth and emotion and with so much simplicity, that it hit to the core. So, I guess it all depends on the performance of it and what one is expecting. I liken that hymn to traditional British hymnody since it was originally written by a Englishman and would have been heard much differently than how it sung in the United States, so I sometimes wonder if a person who is used to hearing it a certain way would be turned off to hearing it sung in a more “rough”, “Americanized” way in the American churches. I personally like both and other various renditions, so I probably would like Ms. Norman’s version as well, but probaby more as a recital piece. Basically, in this particular case, it all depends on how it is sung from the soul and if the instrument is a good one - whether it is classically trained or not.
Off topic, sorry. :o

Well, not so off topic, maybe - it’s about what actually works and what doesn’t, in spite of what we are “told” is “objectively” good and bad.
I would agree. I don’t think this is particuarily off-topic, as well, since it all has to deal with how certain instrumentation, style, genre, intent, etc is used. Analyzing and discussing this in a secular sense would help with how we view music in the sacred sense.
 
What about African composers for the Mass???
No one has mentioned them.

Is African music not acceptable to celebrate Mass? It’s very rhythmic. Or how about the
township melodies? Not all music is “European” based. After all, it is the Catholic Church.
All-inclusive.
 
I’m 67 years old, I’ve been an active Catholic all of my life. My wife was a organist for 42 years in Church and I was a cantor. We’ve been in choirs big and small; Played with guitars, drums, accordians, & bells. There is so much more than to just ask the question “what do you think about guitars during mass?” In a small parish, with the proper selection of songs, a good guitar player can add to the worship. In larger parishes, I’ve seen good guitar players support organ music. Poor musicians, bad selection of music, just doesn’t hack it any place. Some of the best worship I’ve ever seen was not at Mass but in a Prayer Meeting, with guitars and tambourines. I understand we strive to be our best and give our best at Mass, but sometimes it’s not always apprecited because our best does not measure up to the critics who have seen the very best.🙂
 
What about African composers for the Mass???
No one has mentioned them.

Is African music not acceptable to celebrate Mass? It’s very rhythmic. Or how about the
township melodies? Not all music is “European” based. After all, it is the Catholic Church.
All-inclusive.
THey are mentioned indirectly in some of the Vatican documents that call for local composers to write music for the Eucharist in the vernacular style, so long as they are appropriate to the kind of thing the Mass is. But what works in one setting cannot always translate to another - so music that works well in Africa, or in an African congregation in another part of the world, might not be right for another setting. Of course that would go both ways - what works in a European setting might not always work in another culture.
 
I am a big fan of the organ. I feel this is a very good way to celebrate the mass. I wish the organist at my Church would play it more instead of the piano.

What do you think about pianos, guitars, and etc. in place of the organ?

Could anyone see these instruments as dangerous?

Some opinions that I have heard is that the guitar symbolizes a sinful musical genre (rock-and-roll) and the instrument is simply not reverent enough. I personally cannot see any problem with using these for worship as long as the tabernacle is not in the same room!!!

God Bless

Guitars have no place at Mass - they are too secular. Maybe, in 500 years’ time…​

Organs used to be controversial - about 1500 years ago. STM this is a question of culture.
 

Guitars have no place at Mass - they are too secular. Maybe, in 500 years’ time…​

Organs used to be controversial - about 1500 years ago. STM this is a question of culture.
Don’t you think this may be a little too strong? I have been at mas celebrated with the Missionaries of the Poor, the Franciscans of the Renewal and the Fathers of our Lady of Africa, formerlly the White Fathers. They each use instruments that are very much a part of the local culture. Their liturgies are not only beautiful, but also very reverent and their music is very good. They rarely use organs. They can’t afford organs. Few of the their houses have them. But they have many friars who are very talented musicians and talented writers of sacred hymns. Check them out.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
I and two of our brothers go to a parish that is staffed by five our our lay brothers and one priest. Because they have only one priest. we go over to help on Sunday evenings with LIfe Teen. The reason that we go over is because tthey have a church that sits about 1,000 people. What is remarkable is to see about 400-500 teens with the parents at mass. During the entire mass you can hear a pin drop. The reverence of the kids and their parents is awe inspiring. So much so, that one of our auxiliary bishops who visited us yesterday was asking us how we did it. He could not understand how we got to many kids and parents to worship, adore and show so much love at mass. He was deeply moved.

Guess what, all of the music at the mass is done with strings, piano, drums, wind instruments and most of it is written by the Franciscans of the Renewal in NY. There is a place for such instruments when the music is appropriate, well played and moves people to prayer and worship. I would say that 1,000 people, parents and teens is a wonderful testaminory. Not only do the kids come to mass, but they stay after until 9:00 for dinner together, prayer, religious formation, and fellowship. There is a lot of love in that community that comes from the Eucharistic celebration and is carried over into daily life.

I think the decision to have guitars or not is really best left to the lowest level of authority. This is the principal of subsidiarity that the Church embraces.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Thank you, Bluegoat and Sauce (a few posts above): you are getting to the heart of the matter. It has to do with the appropriateness of the music. Nothing else.
Nobody would ever seriously advocate using inappropriate music in a Mass.
 
The Parish I attend uses guitars. It’s awful.

My old Episcopal church atleast used an Organ, and it sounded beautiful.
 
Comic relief time.

In the music of the pipe organ we know the majesty of God. In it’s ending, we know His grace.
 
When my father died, the mass music experience was so “blue collar.” It was just
perfect. The singers weren’t great but it was us. I’ll never forget my father’s funeral for
that. The mistakes, the out of tune singers, but it went with the group that was there.
In the final analysis it just seemed perfect and worshipful.

What else can you ask for?

P.S. I forgot to mention that they played a modern organ. Not my favorite sound.
The only real important thing is the action of the Holy Spirit at mass. And that action is the
Eucharist itself.
 
When my father died, the mass music experience was so “blue collar.” It was just
perfect. The singers weren’t great but it was us. I’ll never forget my father’s funeral for
that. The mistakes, the out of tune singers, but it went with the group that was there.
In the final analysis it just seemed perfect and worshipful.

What else can you ask for?
I wouldn’t consider that “blue collar”. I’d consider that the best this particular parish had to offer, which might be mediocrity or worse. It has nothing to do with being “blue collar”. There are “blue collar” parishes which actually have good musicianship and ones that don’t. The same goes with parishes that are wealthier. It has nothing to do with a class of people. It has more to do with what/who is available.

And I know you didn’t mean it that way, but calling mediocre work as “blue collar” can be misconstrued in the wrong way. It could be insulting to others who were/are blue collar people and take a lot of pride in the quality of work that they do. I will admit, when I first read your post quickly, I was taken aback and thought of my father’s family - blue collar people who are very humble and simple. (I say that with the utmost admiration and positive meaning - my grandparents were/are wonderful people.) I especially thought of my grandfather and how much quality he put into everything he did - from his work as a machinest to his carpentry work building his home and other things, to crafting the most life-like ducks and paintings later on in his retirement years. Nothing he did was “mediocre” and was done with the utmost quality. This was a man who only got through the 10th grade and worked most of his life in a factory as well as doing other jobs to make ends meet, yet he had so many gifts and wisdom. And he had a love of doing things well and appreciating all beauty.

I know that there are many “blue collar” people who were like my grandfather and my family and took pride in the quality of work they did, so it did take me off guard with the idea that something which is mediocre would be considered “blue collar”.

At the same time, I do understand what you are getting at. For me, if it is the best a parish has to offer, I don’t complain and in some way find it touching because you know that they are putting their hearts and soul into it. There is something beautiful about it in it’s own simple way. It’s one of the things I loved so much about the parish attended often which ministered to the farming community. I loved the fact that a farmer played the organ and that nobody were great singers, but they loved to sing out even when the parish lost their organist and any other kind of musician. The simplicity of it and the prayer they put into singing was touching.
 
Nobody would ever seriously advocate using inappropriate music in a Mass.
Oh, how I wish that were true. I’ve had to work with music directors who openly advocated inappropriate compositions or styles of playing - especially if the pastor didn’t care what they did. They knew it wasn’t appropriate, too, but also knew they could get away with it. You see this happen a lot at weddings, where the pastor permits Broadway or pop love songs even though you bring up the fact there is nothing liturgical or sacred about the music. I think that is one of the reasons why topics like this are raised constantly. If all people in charge of music for mass did do their music with reverence, it wouldn’t be an issue today and this thread wouldn’t even be here.

But again, we have to remember that this topic is, literally, centuries old. There is nothing new about it. It’s a natural inclination for people to first go with the emotion of the music that they hear or play before they think about what it is appropriate for liturgy. And it’s one of the reasons why for centuries the Church has constantly had to put their foot down after it gets out of hand a bit or too much out of hand.
 
I think the whole idea that the Church is trying to communicate is that liturgical music must be prayerful. “He who sings, prays twice.”

Let’s face it, many of us, me included, find some organ pieces to be so beautiful that they are actually entertaining, not in a worldly sense, but in a sensual way. They awaken our senses to beauty. One of my favorites is the Messiah. Another of my favorties is Ecce Sacerdos. They ae very power pieces. You can easily get lost in the beauty, but does that mean that you’re praying? Not always.

Whatever instrument you use, the music ministry must try as hard as it can that the music and lyrics are prayerful. That’s why I gave the example of the Franciscans of the Renewal. Their music is very prayerful. But they play whatever instruments have been donated to them. We can see the fruit of their prayer by the work that they do and the growth of their community. Not only are they growing in the number of friars that they have, but the number of young people who visit the for spiritual direction, counseling, retreats, religious education, liturgy and other services is inspiring. They don’t have parishes. But they don’t need them. They have quite a community of religious and laity that is very prayerful and very in tune with the Church.

Our own Brothers of Life of the Order of St. Francis (OSF), which took its inspiration from the Secular Franciscan Order has only one parish. Our entire ministry is Respect Life. Like the CFRs, we use whatever people donate. We have no income. However, we have a large following of people who are committed to this ministry. They come to us to pray, celebrate the Eucharist, spend days of recollection with us, just to hear us speak. This is the product of prayer and liturgy. Sometimes our liturgy uses strings, keyboards, wind instruments, drums and whatever else is available. Most of our music is borrowed from the CFRs and the Missionaries of the Poor who came from Jamaica. We also use some of the oldies but goodies, especially during Advent, Christmas, Lent and Easter. Then there are some old Franciscan hymns that we have resurrected.

But the bottom line is that people pray while they raise their voice in song. Whether it’s the CFRs, the OSF, or the MPs, we always follow the rules of the diocese in which we’re in. The rules are always clear. Liturgical music must elevate people’s hearts and voices in prayer.

Like the poster said above, about the father’s funeral, they did the best they could and they actually prayed. This makes the occassion memorable and pleasing to God and the Church.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
I wouldn’t consider that “blue collar”. I’d consider that the best this particular parish had to offer, which might be mediocrity or worse. It has nothing to do with being “blue collar”. There are “blue collar” parishes which actually have good musicianship and ones that don’t. The same goes with parishes that are wealthier. It has nothing to do with a class of people. It has more to do with what/who is available.

And I know you didn’t mean it that way, but calling mediocre work as “blue collar” can be misconstrued in the wrong way. It could be insulting to others who were/are blue collar people and take a lot of pride in the quality of work that they do. I will admit, when I first read your post quickly, I was taken aback and thought of my father’s family - blue collar people who are very humble and simple. (I say that with the utmost admiration and positive meaning - my grandparents were/are wonderful people.) I especially thought of my grandfather and how much quality he put into everything he did - from his work as a machinest to his carpentry work building his home and other things, to crafting the most life-like ducks and paintings later on in his retirement years. Nothing he did was “mediocre” and was done with the utmost quality. This was a man who only got through the 10th grade and worked most of his life in a factory as well as doing other jobs to make ends meet, yet he had so many gifts and wisdom. And he had a love of doing things well and appreciating all beauty.

I know that there are many “blue collar” people who were like my grandfather and my family and took pride in the quality of work they did, so it did take me off guard with the idea that something which is mediocre would be considered “blue collar”.

At the same time, I do understand what you are getting at. For me, if it is the best a parish has to offer, I don’t complain and in some way find it touching because you know that they are putting their hearts and soul into it. There is something beautiful about it in it’s own simple way. It’s one of the things I loved so much about the parish attended often which ministered to the farming community. I loved the fact that a farmer played the organ and that nobody were great singers, but they loved to sing out even when the parish lost their organist and any other kind of musician. The simplicity of it and the prayer they put into singing was touching.
You totally misunderstand my post. That’s what I cannot stand about the internet and posting. I am very proud of my father’s blue collar status. I’m afraid you “added” something as if blue collar is bad or something. It isn’t. Period.

I see a lot of that on here. People reading into things. Too bad. There is no Utopia her on earth. The holy Spirit performs the “same” action at any mass. That’s all that counts.
The Eucharist. I don’t really care how anybody sings or plays the guitar or the accordian.

I’m blue collar too no matter what my work is. No matter what degrees I hold.
So, forget about it.
 
I think the whole idea that the Church is trying to communicate is that liturgical music must be prayerful. “He who sings, prays twice.”
Exactly, and that is why when you read about music history within the Church, the Church is constantly making sure that this is the case. As I mentioned earlier, we humans have the natural inclination of focusing first on the emotion (or as you say, the sensuality) of the music before focusing on what is actually appropriate for mass in terms of prayer and liturgy. So, the Church has to step and remind people, sometimes by putting her foot down hard, what the focus must be.

In some ways, I think that is why certain advocates of sacred music do not want any vibrato - even the natural vibrato (I’m not talking about the natural vibrato that is produced through dramatic singing such as in operas, broadway, pop music, etc. Every instrument, including the voice as a natural vibrato) - in the voice especially within the treble voices. I think when one hears a certain vibrato, it awakens the senses in various ways. A beautiful voice has been known to make men or women fall totally in love with the voice of the person. It has also been known to make one feel a heavenly presence. I’ve experienced both as the listener and as the singer. There is both a spiritual and sensual connection when one hears a voice, and it’s something a singer-musician must be aware of because it can wield a lot of power. It’s a huge responsibility and something my teachers and mentors have constantly ingrained in me to take seriously as a classical singer. You understand it intellectually while you study, but don’t truly get it until you meet the people who have been touched by what you do.

I mention this because instrumentalists also have this same very large, responsibility. There is so much more to being a musician either in the liturgical sense or the secular sense than just playing one’s instrument well and with artistry. You really have to be aware of what you bring through the music you produce, which is why it is so important to be as knowledgeable as possible with what is appropriate in terms of rendering the music and selecting the music for liturgy.

To tie it in with why guitars may be such a source of contention for use at mass is that although there are people who do play this instrument with reverence and prayer (and I’m sure they do at the masses you have described and experienced), many times there are those who don’t do that. I’ve experienced too many “guitar masses” which were that way and had such a lack of “prayerfulness”. It focused too much on the “sensual”, the “secular”, the “emotion”. Although, most of the guitarists I’ve experienced at mass were just not good guitarists or musicians in general.
Let’s face it, many of us, me included, find some organ pieces to be so beautiful that they are actually entertaining, not in a worldly sense, but in a sensual way. They awaken our senses to beauty. One of my favorites is the Messiah. Another of my favorties is Ecce Sacerdos. They ae very power pieces. You can easily get lost in the beauty, but does that mean that you’re praying? Not always.
This can be true. As a musician, the music I make and hear is almost always a prayer even if it is a secular piece of music. In this regard, I always must be extra aware of what is appropriate liturgically and prayer-wise when doing music for mass. I also realize that there are people who are not musicians and would not take all music they hear as prayerful and might be more taken in with the “sensuality” of the work rather than the prayerful intent of the musician rendering the music. But I believe it was St. Augustine who also mentioned that one of the ways to God is through beauty, itself. For some the beauty of music can totally bring one to a state of prayerful ecstasy. This is especially the case for me along, with the beauty of other things within our faith.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top