O
OutinChgoburbs
Guest
Like I said, what is it? maybe I should have said, why is it?
It’s- the photo- out of context.
It’s- the photo- out of context.
Again, this is a very old practice and still occurs in Latin America and places in Europe. I have seen some of them in Italy.I’m sorry, but I don’t think this should even be ALLOWED inside the church doors. It is still God’s house before, during, and after mass.
Yes, I agree that the layout of the Church is bad. I don’t like it either.Also, I think the new layout of the cathedral stinks. No matter what anyone says the reverance and solemnity have decreased inside that church. Modernizing is not always good.
I could understand if it was the Virgin Mary or the Cross on a smaller scale. It looks comical. I am a convert from Eastern Orthodox, I couldn’t even fathom something like that going on in those parishes. The only reason why I converted is because of St.Peter and the pope. I believe the Catholic Way is the true way, however I think Vatican II did more damage than good. They only needed to change the language so that people could understand it. As I have said earlier, Pope Benedict needs to do a serious crack down on the liturgy. Keep dancers out of the mass, only priests/bishops do the homily, sisters stay out, you are not priests and you do not belong there. Extra Ordinary Eucharistic ministers (lay people) do not give themselves the Body/Blood of Christ. Where is the Tabernacle? It needs to be put back where it belongs, behind the altar, elevated. Female Altar servers? Sorry gotta go. The mass needs to be done in a very serious reverant manner. If I went to a mass in the LA Diocese like people talk about, I would probally fall flat on my face. OK I am off my soapbox. Your turn.Again, this is a very old practice and still occurs in Latin America and places in Europe. I have seen some of them in Italy.
The processions always start in the Church, they usually end there too.
Yes, I agree that the layout of the Church is bad. I don’t like it either.
Other than that this picture is not a case of any lack of reverance or solemnity nor is it a case of any modernizing, except for the layout of the Church.
Just because one does not like the practices of a group does not make them wrong. Again, this is a very ancient practice in many places of the world.
You might not like it, I might not even like it, but that doesn’t mean that it lacks reverence or solemnity. After all, our opinions don’t really matter.
It is up to the Church, and as these sort of things have been going on in the Church for a long, long time, I think it is ok.
The Tabernacle is in a side room, where it doesn’t belong.Brings back memories of the golden calf. Look at where the attention of the people are. God should be the center of attention in a Church, not a float.
I just now caught the picture of what it use to look like. That is a totally outrageous example of how to destroy a fine church.
Can anyone tell me where the tabernacle is? It was kind of like “where’s waldo” for me. I still haven’t spotted it.
I much prefer this sort of layout for my prayer life, because I actually know where Jesus is. This is how our parish has its sanctuary set up now, before the Tabernacle was off in a side nich where a large statue of Our Lady was originally placed and has very recently returned.This is what it used to look like. The liberals have really destroyed the reverance of the mass. This is where I got it from: stjames-cathedral.org/
http://www.stjames-cathedral.org/history/images/1950 High Altar.jpg

And all this time I thought it Jesus Himself…how 'bout that?The altar is, after the gathered assembly of the baptized themselves, the primary sign of Christ in any church building.