M
MichaelP3
Guest
I tend to think God’s DIVINE plan of SALVATION would not have been hindered if she said “no”.
Yes, predestined to be so,before the foundations of the world were laid, in His foreknowledgeShe had the most blessed role in all Creation: to carry God.
Shalom!“Salvation is of the Jews.”, so said Christ.
He did not say salvation is of the HG and Mary to the woman at the well, though it be the crowning moment of Judaism
But i understand the CC’s position, placing her role, continuing role, above all apostles and patriarchs, at the right hand of the Throne, forever CoRedeemer
However it still doesn’t answer the question. (And I feel I need to state as a non-Catholic I have no issue with Catholics venerating Mary. )
You stated 2 points that could be used to venerate Mary. Either her humble “yes” as is so many times stated or the fact that she was specifically formed for this?
So why is she Venerated? By the fact that she carried Jesus or because she said “yes” she will. The first one makes sense and I have no other argument. The latter makes it sound like it was a Divine plan and would have happened either way. Also the latter should make one wonder exactly about God’s Divine plan.
Hi Michael,However it still doesn’t answer the question. (And I feel I need to state as a non-Catholic I have no issue with Catholics venerating Mary. )
You stated 2 points that could be used to venerate Mary. Either her humble “yes” as is so many times stated or the fact that she was specifically formed for this?
So why is she Venerated? By the fact that she carried Jesus or because she said “yes” she will. The first one makes sense and I have no other argument. The latter makes it sound like it was a Divine plan and would have happened either way. Also the latter should make one wonder exactly about God’s Divine plan.
Yes and no…but then one can say the IC was not an approved term either until 1854. The term co redemptrix goes back almost as far as IC…2nd vat did not approve title not because it wasn’t true or part of tradition, but that the exact wording ,definition, needed fine tuning so as not to upset the separated brethren…many feel soon a definitive declaration. ex cathedra, will be declared, and the pope has been asked to do soBut my friend we do not apply the term “C-Redeemer”; both Redemption and possible salvation are from and Through Jesus directly and exclusively.
Nor do Catholics deny that Jesus the Christ is our Redeemer or that His mother, Mary, is anything more than human. It is Protestants who claim Catholics make her a deity. No, she was and will always be His mother, His human mother.The title does not deny Christ as our redeemer nor does it elevate Mary beyond being human.
Well, remember we have 30,000 denoms, and therefore opinions on the matter vary. Some may say what you post. More will say you seem to worship her (and worship may or may not presume the object of affection to be diety). Anything that gets more attention or time spent or affection than God can be considered an idol (money, job, toys, tv,etc.). That is how I see some engagement towards Mary by doctrine but more by practice, that they should more reserved for the Holy Ghost (the guidance, the comforting and care for our souls etc). It is Protestants who claim Catholics make her a deity. No, she was and will always be His mother, His human mother.
I don’t think about it. It’s what we do, in one sense or another, and I don’t have any obligation to rationalize it for anyone.Dear friend in Christ,
What do YOU think about us Catholics and our veneration of Mary?
Both terms are correct, and biblical.Indeed, though I am not sure predestination is the correct term; but certainly in His foreknowledge.
Thank you for your (name removed by moderator)ut ,and sorry some may seem brash about Marion Doctrine. Thank you for seeing difference between worship and idolatry (the latter something we all battle).I neither worship Mary nor idolize her or anyone else. And yes, I know that anything can become an idol if it takes the place of God (Father, Son, Holy Spirit). I learned that long ago.
HiP,Just two weeks ago I concluded such a dialog with a Pentecostal Minister. The grounding issue rest with the word “TRUTH”; they simply are unable {I Believe BLOCKED} from right understandings’; they simply are unable literally from right understanding.
Did you send him a copy of your post outlining your victorious points ?..grinning also…love your passion Patrick…peaceThat conversation was by E-mail and personal.
I don’t feel entitled to get in to names and such; so I’ll decline to provide that information.
May God Guide OUR Life-paths.
Thanks for posting:grinning:
Partick