What I disapprove of are unsubstantiated and disparaging assertions about those who disagree with you. On the other hand, it is what one has come to expect from the crowd pushing AGW.
pushing AGW???
summarizing this thread, seems a root cause of climate change denial is due to fear, doubt and ignorance of basic science,… along w/ faith??? because there exists the sin of PRIDE (i.e. excessive belief in one’s own abilities)
IOW it has been well documented people do not understand the basic “science”
www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tops.12187
AGW isn’t disputed by anyone who knows a lick about the science
so WRT “faith” and the idea of the scientific method
Pride is the excessive love of one’s own excellence. It is ordinarily accounted one of the seven capital sins.
www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/pride
simply put
(
Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
now looking at the catholic capital sin of GLUTTONY (i.e. an inordinate desire to consume more than that which one requires)
(
Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
in a consumer society which is powered by fossil-fuel we see
(
Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
basically from what I learned long ago in one of my catholic high school religion classes, appears GLUTTONY should be considered a sin associated w/ climate change denial because too often there appears to be an excessive desire for food, etc. which causes items to be withheld from the needy along w/ harming creation
there is an expression “the truth hurts…”
but as I see things, it is better than the alternative which is being comforted with a lie AND having problems compound
bottom line,… the source of the talking points you bring up leaves a lot to be desired WRT science (along w/ teaching of faith as I understand things)
Overall, we rate Watts Up with That a strong pseudoscience and conspiracy website based on the promotion of consistent human influenced climate denialism propaganda.
Watts Up with That - Media Bias/Fact Check
so even though this forum is not usually associated w/ higher scientific learning, all reading this should consider
Why and how to debate climate change
…There is rising concern about the narrowness of students’ educational experiences and their lack of exposure to people and/or views with which they disagree. There is also growing evidence of online echo chambers and strong social sorting feeding the rise of identity politics and populism in many societies. We owe our students a learning experience which exposes and explains the reasons for answering in different ways the challenging questions posed by climate change.
www.phys.org/news/2019-12-opinion-debate-climate.html