What does this canon mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1SeekingChrist
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
1

1SeekingChrist

Guest
I was reading through Canon Law in relation to another thread and I came across this one:
Can. 977 The absolution of an accomplice in a sin against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue is invalid except in danger of death.
What exactly does this mean and why would a sin against the sixth commandment have this effect as opposed to the other 9?
 
It means that if a priest had a sexual encounter with someone, he cannot absolve her in confession.
 
I was reading through Canon Law in relation to another thread and I came across this one:

What exactly does this mean and why would a sin against the sixth commandment have this effect as opposed to the other 9?
This regards the accomplice of the priest… namely if the priest is having sex with someone’s wife, he is not allowed to hear her confession on that matter and absolve her unless there is danger of death.
 
This regards the accomplice of the priest… namely if the priest is having sex with someone’s wife, he is not allowed to hear her confession on that matter and absolve her unless there is danger of death.
Rather “if the priest is having sex with anyone, he is not allowed to hear his/her confession on that matter…”
 
Rather “if the priest is having sex with anyone, he is not allowed to hear his/her confession on that matter…”
Mea Culpa, I meant the latter portion of my post only as a concrete example, not a comprehensive statement! Thank you for clarifying a confusing point!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top