What does your Buddhism mean to you?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Curious11
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So what gets reincarnated or goes to the heaven or hell, though, and in what way is it “you”? Your consciousness? Purely your karma (in reincarnation)?

Also, you said they stay for a long time in heaven or hell, but isn’t reincarnation a quick thing in some traditions like 7 or 49 days?
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the information. I suppose a better question might be whether it is kosher to be an Orthodox Jew and practice Buddhism at the same time? Probably not. But Leonard Cohen touched all the bases: Judaism, Buddhism, and a fascination with Jesus.
 
Am I a bad person for eating chicken or fish? I just ate fish yesterday. Aren’t plants or vegetables living things too? I just ate green beans and had an apple. I have seen Buddhist temples what are made of wood and tree trunks. Did they come from non-life trees?

Is abortion killing an innocent human life? If so, according to the tenets of Buddhism, all Buddhists must be pro-life. Is it correct?

My priest just drank the precious blood of Christ during the last Mass. Did he violate the intoxicants rule?

What does Buddhism say about homosexuality and polygamy? Are the considered sexual misconduct?

Who created me and you? If not by God Himself? What about immortal souls? Will I possibly become rats or snakes after I die?

What about poor, sick and disabled people? Aren’t they being that way because they deserved it for doing bad things in their previous lives? If so, why should they be helped or offered compassion since they are being punished for what they had done.

There are pedophiles who are abusing children. These people in their judgment believe that are doing nothing wrong. Who are you to tell them otherwise? Who decides what is good? You, me or who?
 
Last edited:
Am I a bad person for eating chicken or fish? I just ate fish yesterday. Aren’t plants or vegetables living things too? I just ate green beans and had an apple. I have seen Buddhist temples what are made of wood and tree trunks. Did they come from non-life trees?
The rule for Buddhist monks is that they may not eat any animal that they “see, hear or suspect” was killed for them to eat. So those upmarket restaurants where you pick a live fish from a tank are off-limits. If the fish is dead on the slab when you walk in, then it’s OK. Some Buddhists are vegetarian, others are not.
Is abortion killing an innocent human life? If so, according to the tenets of Buddhism, all Buddhists must be pro-life. Is it correct?
As with Christianity, this is a controversial subject. A newly fertilized zygote is alive, but it is not human: it lacks some of the elements that make up a human. As it develops in the womb it acquires the missing parts. Some Buddhists allow reasonably early terminations for good reasons, others do not.
My priest just drank the precious blood of Christ during the last Mass. Did he violate the intoxicants rule?
Cannibalism is strictly forbidden. 😃 Did he drink enough to get drunk?
What does Buddhism say about homosexuality and polygamy? Are the considered sexual misconduct?
Again, it varies. Some say one or both are wrong, others say they cause no harm and can be allowed.
Who created me and you? If not by God Himself? What about immortal souls? Will I possibly become rats or snakes after I die?
You created you by your actions in your previous lives. I created me in the same way. There are no immortal souls in Buddhism.

You may end up in a hell, as an animal, a human or in a heaven when you are reborn. The good news is that he hells are not eternal; the bad news is that the heavens aren’t either. The way to escape is to attain nirvana during a lifetime, then you are not reborn when you die.
What about poor, sick and disabled people? Aren’t they being that way because they deserved it for doing bad things in their previous lives? If so, why should they be helped or offered compassion since they are being punished for what they had done.
“punished” is not quite the right word; “consequences” is better. You offering a poor person charity is another consequence of their previous actions. Karma covers a lot of things, not just the big and obvious ones. Both compassion and charity are Buddhist virtues.
There are pedophiles who are abusing children. These people in their judgment believe that are doing nothing wrong. Who are you to tell them otherwise? Who decides what is good? You, me or who?
There is no “who” who decides. Actions bring results, “As you sow, so shall you reap.” If you throw a stone straight up in the air and it comes down hitting you on the head, whose fault is that? You took the action so you own the result.

rossum
 
As a Buddhist, are you allowed to cultivate a garden? That is to say you grow the plants and eventually cut off the vegetables or fruits for your own consumption. Or you have to wait the fruits to drop on the ground?

If there is no “who” who decides, then what is the point of the court system. Does it have any role at all in a society? If there is a dispute between neighbors, who decides who is wrong? If no one decides, wouldn’t that descend into chaos and anarchy? If a pedophile and a child are happy with each other, then according to Buddhist rule, is it perfect good for this relationship to persist?

Pol Pol and Mao, for example, believed what they did was right while millions of innocent people were slaughtered in their own hands, can there not be a “who” decides that there murderous actions were wrong? In their mind and thoughts, they felt what they did was the right/good thing for the future of their peoples, why can’t they merit higher things after they died? What about the millions of innocent people who were slaughtered, was it fate or destiny that were to be murdered, or were they facing the consequences of bad actions from their previous lives?

Certain food growing/processing professions such as farmers, chicken slaughterers, butchers, chefs, cooks (I am thinking of my mom and my grandmother), are these people bad people and what will become of these people when they die? After all, millions upon millions of animals, fruits and plants are slaughtered/cut by these people everyday, how are these people be compared to Pol Pot and Mao?

If I see a poor/homeless person on the street or a disabled child, is it safe to assume that they are facing “consequences” for bad actions in their previous lives?
 
Last edited:
As a Buddhist, are you allowed to cultivate a garden? That is to say you grow the plants and eventually cut off the vegetables or fruits for your own consumption. Or you have to wait the fruits to drop on the ground?
Your “allowed” is not quite right. There is no “Thou shalt not…” there is merely advice. You may follow that advice or not, as you wish. Whatever you do, you will see the consequences of your actions.
Mind precedes all conditions,
mind is their chief, they are mind-made.
If you speak or act with an evil mind then suffering will follow you,
as the wheel follows the draught ox.

Mind precedes all conditions,
mind is their chief, they are mind-made.
If you speak or act with a pure mind then happiness will follow you,
as a shadow that never leaves.

– Dhammapada 1:1-2
If there is no “who” who decides, then what is the point of the court system. Does it have any role at all in a society? If there is a dispute between neighbors, who decides who is wrong? If no one decides, wouldn’t that descend into chaos and anarchy? If a pedophile and a child are happy with each other, then according to Buddhist rule, is it perfect good for this relationship to persist?
Let’s try that in a different key:
If there is God who judges then what is the point of the court system. Does it have any role at all in a society? If there is a dispute between neighbors … then according to Christian rule, is it perfect good for this relationship to persist?
Your question answers itself. When asking questions about a different religion it can be helpful to first rephrase the question in terms of your own religion.
Pol Pol and Mao, for example, believed what they did was right while millions of innocent people were slaughtered in their own hands, can there not be a “who” decides that there murderous actions were wrong?
Why do you need a “who”? Gravity is not a “who” and yet it can act perfectly well. Think of karma as like gravity for morality, it acts but is not a person.
Certain food growing/processing professions such as farmers, chicken slaughterers, butchers, chefs, cooks (I am thinking of my mom and my grandmother), are these people bad people and what will become of these people when they die?
All those people are human beings, with their good points and their less good points. Whatever their actions, good or bad, they will see the consequences of their actions.
If I see a poor/homeless person on the street or a disabled child, is it safe to assume that they are facing “consequences” for bad actions in their previous lives?
When you see anybody they are facing consequences. Karma covers a lot more than just rich or poor.

rossum
 
Although there is some commonality between Christianity and Buddhism when it comes to compassion, gentleness and kindness, there are clearly irreconcilable differences between them. Among which are reincarnation, immortality of the soul, God the Creator and in the flesh, eternal Heaven and Hell, etc… We will leave it there… I thank you for your thoughts.

PS: Some years back, despite our differences, I had a few Buddhist friends whom I believe were among the kindest and most gentle people I have ever met.

God bless…
 
Last edited:
My Thai friend is a Buddhist. She also loves God, Catholic church and praying.

She is a strong Buddhist and a very kind and caring person indeed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top