It’s not a well founded hope.tolerate them to keep them within reaching distance?
With respect, I think that this precise issue is presented by both cultural Catholics and other Catholics. Or are you saying that any Catholic that deviates in any way from Catholic teaching is necessarily a “cultural Catholic”? Some of the most devout Catholics I know dissent from Church teaching in certain areas. In any event, I don’t see why the community should treat so-called “cultural Catholics” differently from any other Catholic.Do you think these culturally Catholics should be confronted on their lack of following the faith as strictly as the church wishes or should you just accept their laxity and hope for the best…
It’s usually an intellectual one and chances are that these things don’t appear on a parish level.In any event, I don’t see why the community should treat so-called “cultural Catholics” differently from any other Catholic.
No, I didn’t mean active Catholics that have specific issues. I was asking about Catholics that really don’t attend Church very often, don’t follow the faith in any pious manner, are more worldly…yet still claim to be Catholics and maybe show up at Easter and Christmas, baptize their children, may even send them to catholic school…those types.Or are you saying that any Catholic that deviates in any way from Catholic teaching is necessarily a “cultural Catholic”?
I think the cultural part implies they aren’t in the church.hould you drive them out to keep the Church holier
If I say to the wicked, You shall surely die—and you do not warn them or speak out to dissuade the wicked from their evil conduct in order to save their lives—then they shall die for their sin, but I will hold you responsible for their blood. If, however, you warn the wicked and they still do not turn from their wickedness and evil conduct, they shall die for their sin, but you shall save your life.
I think that the majority of these “cultural Catholics” do have some sort of belief in the supernatural — they’re not atheists — but don’t go “full bore” because that would require them to make too many changes in their lives, make their lives more difficult, and some would just reply that they “aren’t all that religious”. There are some people, of all religions, whose disposition and personality just doesn’t fit well with religiosity. Everyone is different.I think this is a pretty good summary, but I would add that at least sometimes the difference relates to the person’s belief in the supernatural. These people often believe that the Catholic lifestyle is a good and proper lifestyle, including believing in and following Catholic moral teachings, but they may not believe in God, or at least in the Trinitarian God of Christianity. In this way they are similar to the cultural Jews referenced earlier in the thread. Like many terms, however, there is no one definition that would fit everyone who embraces the term. Many people that are cultural Catholics feel pretty strongly that they are “really” Catholic, just as most cultural Jews would say they are truly Jewish.
Because of the above, it can be pretty hard to tell if someone who presents as Catholic is a cultural Catholic. I know any number of people who practice the faith in a pretty devout manner are agnostic (at best).
If I knew what exactly it was, I could say.Do you think these culturally Catholics should be confronted on their lack of following the faith as strictly as the church wishes or should you just accept their laxity and hope for the best…a return to better faith?
That’s pretty presumptuous. A lot of reverts were cultural Catholics.It’s not a well founded hope.
If they were baptized Catholic, they are members of the Church.I think the cultural part implies they aren’t in the church.