D
DarkLight
Guest
Just a curiosity question - what’s the procedure if the Mass is interrupted during/after consecration and the priest is unable to continue?
what if you are not able to get a second priest? i.e. crazy killer comes in and kills the only priest in the parish and starts shooting at everyone else? how would communion be able to be distributed? or does only the priest have to consume it?Does this answer your question?
- Defects may occur also in the performance of the rite itself, if any of the required elements is lacking, as in the following cases: if the Mass is celebrated in a place that is not sacred, or not lawfully approved, or on an altar not consecrated, or not covered with three cloths; if there are no wax candles; if it is not the proper time for celebrating Mass, which is from one hour before dawn until one hour after noon under ordinary circumstances, unless some other time is established or permitted for certain Masses; if the priest fails to wear some one of the priestly vestments; if the priestly vestments and the altar cloths have not been blessed; if there is no cleric present nor any other man or boy serving the Mass; if there is not a chalice, with a cup of gold, or of silver with the inside gold-plated; if the paten is not gold-plated; if both chalice and paten are not consecrated by a bishop; if the corporal is not clean (and the corporal should be of linen, not decorated in the middle with silk or gold; and both corporal and pall should be blessed); if the priest celebrates Mass with his head covered, without a dispensation to do so; if there is no missal present, even though the priest may know by heart the Mass he intends to say.
- If, while the priest is celebrating Mass, the church is violated before he has reached the Canon, the Mass is to be discontinued; if after the Canon, it is not to be discontinued. If there is fear of an attack by enemies, or of a flood or of the collapse of the building where the Mass is being celebrated, the Mass is to be discontinued if it is before the Consecration; if this fear arises after the Consecration, however, the priest may omit everything else and go on at once to the reception of the Sacrament.
- If before the Consecration the priest becomes seriously ill, or faints, or dies, the Mass is discontinued. If this happens after the consecration of the Body only and before the consecration of the Blood, or after both have been consecrated, the Mass is to be completed by another priest from the place where the first priest stopped, and in case of necessity even by a priest who is not fasting. If the first priest has not died but has become ill and is still able to receive Communion, and there is no other consecrated host at hand, the priest who is completing the Mass should divide the host, give one part to the sick priest and consume the other part himself. If the priest has died after half-saying the formula for the consecration of the Body, then there is no Consecration and no need for another priest to complete the Mass. If, on the other hand, the priest has died after half- saying the formula for the consecration of the Blood, then another priest is to complete the Mass, repeating the whole formula over the same chalice from the words Simili modo, postquam cenatum est; or he may say the whole formula over another chalice which has been prepared, and consume the first priest’s host and the Blood consecrated by himself, and then the chalice which was left half-consecrated.
Frankly, in that scenario receiving Communion would be the last thing on my mind.what if you are not able to get a second priest? i.e. crazy killer comes in and kills the only priest in the parish and starts shooting at everyone else? how would communion be able to be distributed? or does only the priest have to consume it?
Paragraph 31 raises certain questions. Does “defect” = “liturgical abuse?” Our altar has a single altar cloth, not three. Our priest wears neither an amice nor a cincture. Nothing in this paragraph appears to contemplate a vigil Mass said at or after 4 PM. “Nor any other man or boy serving the Mass” – this seems to leave no room for female altar servers. So I’m guessing that a Vigil Mass served by an “altar girl” assisting an amice-less and cincture-less priest said at an altar with only a single altar cloth is “defective” in multiple ways?Does this answer your question?
- Defects may occur also in the performance of the rite itself, if any of the required elements is lacking, as in the following cases: if the Mass is celebrated in a place that is not sacred, or not lawfully approved, or on an altar not consecrated, or not covered with three cloths; if there are no wax candles; if it is not the proper time for celebrating Mass, which is from one hour before dawn until one hour after noon under ordinary circumstances, unless some other time is established or permitted for certain Masses; if the priest fails to wear some one of the priestly vestments; if the priestly vestments and the altar cloths have not been blessed; if there is no cleric present nor any other man or boy serving the Mass; if there is not a chalice, with a cup of gold, or of silver with the inside gold-plated; if the paten is not gold-plated; if both chalice and paten are not consecrated by a bishop; if the corporal is not clean (and the corporal should be of linen, not decorated in the middle with silk or gold; and both corporal and pall should be blessed); if the priest celebrates Mass with his head covered, without a dispensation to do so; if there is no missal present, even though the priest may know by heart the Mass he intends to say.
- If, while the priest is celebrating Mass, the church is violated before he has reached the Canon, the Mass is to be discontinued; if after the Canon, it is not to be discontinued. If there is fear of an attack by enemies, or of a flood or of the collapse of the building where the Mass is being celebrated, the Mass is to be discontinued if it is before the Consecration; if this fear arises after the Consecration, however, the priest may omit everything else and go on at once to the reception of the Sacrament.
- If before the Consecration the priest becomes seriously ill, or faints, or dies, the Mass is discontinued. If this happens after the consecration of the Body only and before the consecration of the Blood, or after both have been consecrated, the Mass is to be completed by another priest from the place where the first priest stopped, and in case of necessity even by a priest who is not fasting. If the first priest has not died but has become ill and is still able to receive Communion, and there is no other consecrated host at hand, the priest who is completing the Mass should divide the host, give one part to the sick priest and consume the other part himself. If the priest has died after half-saying the formula for the consecration of the Body, then there is no Consecration and no need for another priest to complete the Mass. If, on the other hand, the priest has died after half- saying the formula for the consecration of the Blood, then another priest is to complete the Mass, repeating the whole formula over the same chalice from the words Simili modo, postquam cenatum est; or he may say the whole formula over another chalice which has been prepared, and consume the first priest’s host and the Blood consecrated by himself, and then the chalice which was left half-consecrated.
It HAS to be done over [again]Just a curiosity question - what’s the procedure if the Mass is interrupted during/after consecration and the priest is unable to continue?
Those are “incidental”* rules that have since been changed by the Church. For example, I wear an alb with a cincture pre-attached, so that acts as an acceptable substitute for a rope-style cincture. Same with the amice, which is only needed if the collar on the alb does not cover the priest’s street clothes. Etc.Paragraph 31 raises certain questions. Does “defect” = “liturgical abuse?” Our altar has a single altar cloth, not three. Our priest wears neither an amice nor a cincture. Nothing in this paragraph appears to contemplate a vigil Mass said at or after 4 PM. “Nor any other man or boy serving the Mass” – this seems to leave no room for female altar servers. So I’m guessing that a Vigil Mass served by an “altar girl” assisting an amice-less and cincture-less priest said at an altar with only a single altar cloth is “defective” in multiple ways?
Frankly, yes, it does.Paragraph 31 raises certain questions. Does “defect” = “liturgical abuse?” …
Only the priest.what if you are not able to get a second priest? i.e. crazy killer comes in and kills the only priest in the parish and starts shooting at everyone else? how would communion be able to be distributed? or does only the priest have to consume it?
Already answered. Read the document.I presume if necessary they would bring in a priest from another area, even if it resulted in significant delay, to finish mass? A lot of parishes have only one priest assigned to them, so a priest would have to be brought in from a neighboring parish in order to finish mass. And of course there’s the question of what they would do if it were a rural parish and no other priest was available.
The rules (call them “internal” if you will) have already been posted.Good afternoon Father David and Deacon Jeff ((name removed by moderator))
I read all the rules and what comes to mind is what the Church is called in Spanish, “Holy Mother Church” and as a Mother, the Church has a bit of flexibility. For instance, there could be “internal rules” in places where the Faith is persecuted. A very simple yes or no is enough because I do not want even the possibility of endangering our brothers and sisters in those locations. No details, please. We never ever know the “damage” we may cause.
Thank you.
THEN DO THE NEXT best thing and make a SPIRITUAL Holy Communion; ALSO a source of graceFrankly, in that scenario receiving Communion would be the last thing on my mind.
Less extreme possibilities exist. What I’ve been instructed to do is have a deacon or EMHC distribute. If neither are present, the consecrated hosts are reposed in the tabernacle and there is no Communion for the laity. But again, if a gunman is endangering everyone at Mass the top priority is to keep the Blessed Sacrament and those in attendance as safe as possible. Continuing the Mass would not likely be feasible.
In such times, there is a principle that reminds us “the law does not bind in an impossible situation.”Random follow-up question: is it allowed to, say, celebrate mass without a proper altar and other trappings if they aren’t available? I was thinking in cases of either persecution or disaster where a church and altarcloth and such might not be available.
Read up on “Mass rocks” in rural Ireland. There are also numerous pictures of WWII battlefield Masses being said on the hoods of Jeeps.Random follow-up question: is it allowed to, say, celebrate mass without a proper altar and other trappings if they aren’t available? I was thinking in cases of either persecution or disaster where a church and altarcloth and such might not be available.