What happens when Catholics die

  • Thread starter Thread starter katpants
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay back when I was raised Baptist: If you believe in God you go to Heaven, if not you go to hell.

I am TOTALLY confused on purgatory, praying for folks already dead, do we go to Heaven or hell right off the bat or is there a time we wait, what happens to Protestants who die…

:confused:

Thanks again!

Kat
As with Protestants, Catholics believe there are only two final states - heaven or hell.

However people who die in imperfect grace, or whose personalities need a clean-up, go to Purgatory for a length of time. If you get to Purgatory, you’ll get to heaven eventually.

It’s a logical necessity. Suppose a serial murderer who has cold bloodedly killed ten people and is sentenced to life in prison or death becomes a Christian a short time before he dies himself.

I believe God will forgive him, as He must be faithful to His word.

However if that serial killer has hardly made an ounce of progress towards personal holiness, then how the hell is he going to walk straight into heaven? As St. Paul wrote about the man who has nothing to bring to heaven …

I Corinthians 3:11-15
11For no man can lay a foundation other than the one which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12Now if any man builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, 13each man’s work will become evident; for the day will show it because it is to be revealed with fire, and the fire itself will test the quality of each man’s work. 14If any man’s work which he has built on it remains, he will receive a reward. 15If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire.
A serial murderer would have virtually no work to present, so he will escape only as one escaping through the flames (of Purgatory).

Sure it’s not mentioned by name, but it’s implied in several places. The Trinity isn’t mentioned by name either, but it’s certainly implied.

Frankly what’s the point of Protestants preaching personal holiness if they believe a serial murderer can confess at the last minute, and then just waltz into heaven? They may as well not bother.

As for the fate of Protestants I’ve got my own thoughts, which I won’t go into here, and I used to be a Protestant.
 
When a person sins, he incurs the guilt of the sin and a stain on his soul. Repentance removes the guilt of venal sin, and also removes the guilt of mortal sin when combined with confession or perfect contrition. However, afterwards the stain still remains, this can be taken away by the indulgences offered by the Church, which are available only to Catholics. If there is the guilt of mortal sin on a person’s soul when they die, they go to Hell. If not, but the person has the guilt of genial sin or the stain of any sin on their soul, they must go to purgatory to be expiated, then he goes to Heaven afterwards. Only if there is neither the guilt nor the stain of any sin on a person’s soul, can he go directly to Heaven. Indulgences to remove the stain of sin can be received for oneself or for souls on purgatory. Even apart from indulgences, we pray for the dead in purgatory that they may more quickly have rest in Heaven.

Protestants who die, if they don’t go straight to Hell, will likely spend a long time in purgatory, since they lack access to indulgences.
As there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church we don’t know if any Protestants will be saved. The Church does not define which individuals or groups might be covered by invincible ignorance. We may have an opinion on this but we cannot say Protestants can be saved or not.
 
As there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church we don’t know if any Protestants will be saved. The Church does not define which individuals or groups might be covered by invincible ignorance. We may have an opinion on this but we cannot say Protestants can be saved or not.
We cannot say Catholics will be saved or not either. Plenty of baptized Catholics will be damned due to their turning from God.

Baptized Protestants that follow God and are turned toward them can be saved. Anyone who is baptized is Catholic rather they admit it or understand it or not.
 
We cannot say Catholics will be saved or not either. Plenty of baptized Catholics will be damned due to their turning from God.

Baptized Protestants that follow God and are turned toward them can be saved. Anyone who is baptized is Catholic rather they admit it or understand it or not.
We can say with absolute certainty that any Catholic who dies in a state of grace will be saved.
 
As there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church we don’t know if any Protestants will be saved. The Church does not define which individuals or groups might be covered by invincible ignorance. We may have an opinion on this but we cannot say Protestants can be saved or not.
No we don’t strictly know that it’s happened. But we do know that it’s possible, and after hundreds of millions it would seem highly unlikely that not one would.

I am not of the opinion that we should expect their being saved to be normative.
 
As with Protestants, Catholics believe there are only two final states - heaven or hell.

However people who die in imperfect grace, or whose personalities need a clean-up, go to Purgatory for a length of time. If you get to Purgatory, you’ll get to heaven eventually.

It’s a logical necessity. Suppose a serial murderer who has cold bloodedly killed ten people and is sentenced to life in prison or death becomes a Christian a short time before he dies himself.

I believe God will forgive him, as He must be faithful to His word.

However if that serial killer has hardly made an ounce of progress towards personal holiness, then how the hell is he going to walk straight into heaven? As St. Paul wrote about the man who has nothing to bring to heaven …

I Corinthians 3:11-15

A serial murderer would have virtually no work to present, so he will escape only as one escaping through the flames (of Purgatory).

Sure it’s not mentioned by name, but it’s implied in several places. The Trinity isn’t mentioned by name either, but it’s certainly implied.

Frankly what’s the point of Protestants preaching personal holiness if they believe a serial murderer can confess at the last minute, and then just waltz into heaven? They may as well not bother.

As for the fate of Protestants I’ve got my own thoughts, which I won’t go into here, and I used to be a Protestant.
Hi Bob,
What is your take on St Luke 23:40-43? This is where the thief on the cross (an obvious sinner who was undoubtedly unbaptized) is told by Jesus Christ, “Today you shall be with me in paradise”. Was he an exception to the rule of purgatory because Jesus pardoned him personally or did he just spend a short time there (less than a day)?
 
Hi Bob,
What is your take on St Luke 23:40-43? This is where the thief on the cross (an obvious sinner who was undoubtedly unbaptized) is told by Jesus Christ, “Today you shall be with me in paradise”. Was he an exception to the rule of purgatory because Jesus pardoned him personally or did he just spend a short time there (less than a day)?
The church teaches baptism of desire which covers that part.
Purgatory is part of “paradise” as it’s not hell and its a transformation into holiness in light of God and his refining fire.

Second the church teaches that our sufferings, prayers, etc on earth aid in our sanctification and growing in holiness. Any other purification is done in purgatory Enroute to heaven. So there is a very good possibility that the thief was fully purified by his faith and offering his suffering to Christ. Being a witness in the face of such excruciating agony.

Third, the after life is apart from time. By Jesus saying the thief would be in heaven that day, it means that they will leave this world that day. Upon leaving this world the thief was destined for paradise even if a transforming process occurred on the way.

Imagine I told you, today you will be with me on a cruise trip to Hawaii. We arrived at the airport and went through the process to go on the cruise. We did not actually get on the boat until the next day. Would their be a conflict in my statement, or would most people see leaving on the journey as part of the trip regardless of if we actually ended at the destination that day.
 
The church teaches baptism of desire which covers that part.
Purgatory is part of “paradise” as it’s not hell and its a transformation into holiness in light of God and his refining fire.

Second the church teaches that our sufferings, prayers, etc on earth aid in our sanctification and growing in holiness. Any other purification is done in purgatory Enroute to heaven. So there is a very good possibility that the thief was fully purified by his faith and offering his suffering to Christ. Being a witness in the face of such excruciating agony.

Third, the after life is apart from time. By Jesus saying the thief would be in heaven that day, it means that they will leave this world that day. Upon leaving this world the thief was destined for paradise even if a transforming process occurred on the way.

Imagine I told you, today you will be with me on a cruise trip to Hawaii. We arrived at the airport and went through the process to go on the cruise. We did not actually get on the boat until the next day. Would their be a conflict in my statement, or would most people see leaving on the journey as part of the trip regardless of if we actually ended at the destination that day.
Hi Jon S,
I understand your analogy about the trip but I think it takes more mental gymnastics to interpret it that way than to interpret it at face value – that the thief would be in paradise that same day.

That is how my Catholic friends ask me to interpret the verse about Peter being the rock upon which the Church is built, whereas most protestants consider the faith in Christ shown by Peter to be the true rock upon which the Church is built.

I am not a biblical scholar, but it seems curious that different faith traditions interpret scripture literally at times and then figuratively at times to suit their doctrine.

Note: I am including my own in this, as well.
 
Hi Bob,
What is your take on St Luke 23:40-43? This is where the thief on the cross (an obvious sinner who was undoubtedly unbaptized) is told by Jesus Christ, “Today you shall be with me in paradise”. Was he an exception to the rule of purgatory because Jesus pardoned him personally or did he just spend a short time there (less than a day)?
Before the death and Resurrection of Christ, no one could go to Heaven so the righteous went to an interim natural paradise. Since this was not a supernatural paradise (they were fully naturally happy, but didn’t possess the immediate vision of God yet), it is unlikely that purgatory would have been necessary.
 
Hi Jon S,
I understand your analogy about the trip but I think it takes more mental gymnastics to interpret it that way than to interpret it at face value – that the thief would be in paradise that same day.

That is how my Catholic friends ask me to interpret the verse about Peter being the rock upon which the Church is built, whereas most protestants consider the faith in Christ shown by Peter to be the true rock upon which the Church is built.

I am not a biblical scholar, but it seems curious that different faith traditions interpret scripture literally at times and then figuratively at times to suit their doctrine.

Note: I am including my own in this, as well.
I don’t know…I feel like I am treating it literally.

I think we all agree we are transformed from sinners to holy when we die…you guys don’t have a word for that. We do. It’s purgatory. It may take an instant, it may take “time” we don’t pretend to know.

purgatory is the ultimate refining of the refiners fire…sounds like paradise to me.

The church teaches Purgstory is a state of being not a place. In the after life there is heaven and hell. If your not in hell you are in paradise, even if your in process of transformation.

I don’t think Jesus felt like giving a detailed sermon while dying on the cross…he kept it brief and encouraging giving the thief exactly what the thief needed.

He let his apostles give more details later (Corinthians ).

Check out this quote from Pope Benedict in Spe Salvi regarding what happens at death.

“Some recent theologians are of the opinion that the fire which both burns and saves is Christ himself, the Judge and Saviour. The encounter with him is the decisive act of judgement. Before his gaze all falsehood melts away. This encounter with him, as it burns us, transforms and frees us, allowing us to become truly ourselves. All that we build during our lives can prove to be mere straw, pure bluster, and it collapses. Yet in the pain of this encounter, when the impurity and sickness of our lives become evident to us, there lies salvation. His gaze, the touch of his heart heals us through an undeniably painful transformation “as through fire”. But it is a blessed pain, in which the holy power of his love sears through us like a flame, enabling us to become totally ourselves and thus totally of God. In this way the inter-relation between justice and grace also becomes clear: the way we live our lives is not immaterial, but our defilement does not stain us for ever if we have at least continued to reach out towards Christ, towards truth and towards love. Indeed, it has already been burned away through Christ’s Passion. At the moment of judgement we experience and we absorb the overwhelming power of his love over all the evil in the world and in ourselves. The pain of love becomes our salvation and our joy.”

Or this one from Pope Benefict XVI in his book.

""The transforming ‘moment’ of this encounter cannot be quantified by the measurements of earthly time. It is, indeed, not eternal but a transition, and yet trying to qualify it as of ‘short’ or ‘long’ duration on the basis of temporal measurements derived from physics would be naive and unproductive. The ‘temporal measure’ of this encounter lies in the unsoundable depths of existence, in a passing-over where we are burned ere we are transformed. To measure such Existenzzeit, such an ‘existential time,’ in terms of the time of this world would be to ignore the specificity of the human spirit in its simultaneous relationship with, and differentation from, the world.
. . .
"[Purgatory] is the inwardly necessary process of transformation in which a person becomes capable of Christ, capable of God and thus capable of unity with the whole communion of saints.
. . .
“Encounter with the Lord is this transformation.”…

–Joseph Ratzinger, Eschatology: Death and Eternal Life, p. 230-231
 
As there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church we don’t know if any Protestants will be saved. The Church does not define which individuals or groups might be covered by invincible ignorance. We may have an opinion on this but we cannot say Protestants can be saved or not.
“The Church knows that she is joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter. Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church. With the Orthodox churches, this communion is so profound that it lacks little to attain the fullness that would permit a common celebration of the Lord’s Eucharist.” (CCC 838) (Emphasis added by me)
 
“The Church knows that she is joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter. Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church. With the Orthodox churches, this communion is so profound that it lacks little to attain the fullness that would permit a common celebration of the Lord’s Eucharist.” (CCC 838) (Emphasis added by me)
👍
 
Hi Bob,
What is your take on St Luke 23:40-43? This is where the thief on the cross (an obvious sinner who was undoubtedly unbaptized) is told by Jesus Christ, “Today you shall be with me in paradise”. Was he an exception to the rule of purgatory because Jesus pardoned him personally or did he just spend a short time there (less than a day)?
I think the thief on the cross was a special case. He was literally crucified with Christ.

Secondly Christ may have promised him that he’d be with him in paradise that day, but we don’t know at what time of day this exchange took place. If it was midday, the thief still had 3 hours of intense agony ahead of him, plus the breaking of his legs with something like a sledge hammer to endure.

To say that he got scot free into heaven is somewhat of an exaggeration. Even after Christ promised him entry into paradise, he still had a torrid time ahead of him. You might say he did some of his purgatory on the cross, paying for his history of thieving and reflecting on his misdeeds, as he himself admitted, when he rebuked the other, unrepentant thief.

Secondly, what is “paradise”? Heaven in the sense of the beatific vision, or the near heavenly upper reaches of purgatory?

I think he was a special case.

As for being unbaptised (which we don’t know for sure anyway - he may have been baptised by John for all we know, although probably not), the Catholic Church makes allowance for “intention”. If for example a man had made quite sincere arrangements to be baptised, but was killed in an accident beforehand, the Church believes God would recognise his sincere intention, and accept he had been baptised at his death.

I think there were about 300 million people on earth at the time of Christ. Most of them would never have had a chance to hear about the Gospel, but God wouldn’t write them off either because they never had a chance. He’s not that much of a martinet.
 
No we don’t strictly know that it’s happened. But we do know that it’s possible, and after hundreds of millions it would seem highly unlikely that not one would.

I am not of the opinion that we should expect their being saved to be normative.
We DO KNOW objectively that any Catholic who dies in a state of grace is saved because that is taught infallibly by the Church.

We DO STRICTLY KNOW it has happened otherwise the Church would be a fraud for canonizing anyone.
 
We DO KNOW objectively that any Catholic who dies in a state of grace is saved because that is taught infallibly by the Church.

We DO STRICTLY KNOW it has happened otherwise the Church would be a fraud for canonizing anyone.
I was talking about Protestants.
 
We DO KNOW objectively that any Catholic who dies in a state of grace is saved because that is taught infallibly by the Church.

We DO STRICTLY KNOW it has happened otherwise the Church would be a fraud for canonizing anyone.
I was talking about Protestants.
The Catechism teaches otherwise. See CCC 838, posted above. It says that non-Catholic Christians are in a " Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church" It acknowledges that non-Catholic Christians can go to Heaven.

catholic.com/quickquestions/does-no-salvation-outside-the-church-include-non-catholic-christians
 
The Catechism teaches otherwise. See CCC 838, posted above. It says that non-Catholic Christians are in a " Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church" It acknowledges that non-Catholic Christians can go to Heaven.

catholic.com/quickquestions/does-no-salvation-outside-the-church-include-non-catholic-christians
That doesn’t contradict what I said. The Catechism does not speak to frequency or rarity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top