B
Bluegoat
Guest
I think this sort of thing was common pretty much everywhere, including Christian countries.Uh… ok. Where did you read that?
Because I never read anything about Islam allowing concubines. And this idea about women being used for sex? I’m convinced it’s a western fantasy. It’s true that there were women captives (prisoners of war, really, more than “slaves”) whom men were allowed to have intercourse with–provided they were taking care of them, by giving them proper food, clothing, shelter. In fact, the captives were supposed to eat as well as the family ate, to dress as well as the family dressed, and so on.
When Arab tribes fought, the losers were enslaved by the victors. Islam set in place a means through which captives (essentially, prisoners of war) would become free. But it’s not like men went around “enslaving” women to “use” them for sex.
Kind of a wacky distortion, if you ask me, though certainly not the majority.