To me these statements can be taken to mean that the offence of sin is against Mary and not God.
It says offences not sins btw, but imagine if you were Jesus and all day long you had to listen to people scorn your mother, in your name none the less. Or even God, who hates to hear any of his creatures mocked and scorned, lest the creature he created perfect so that he could take human form within her. It’s saying that by committing offences against Mary, we are hurting God, which is a sin.
But worse they seem to indicate that sinners go hell because nobody is sacrificing for them. This would imply that Jesus’ one sacrifice is not sufficient to save sinners. The only sacrifice needed has been made. No sacrifice we could make would prevent someone from going to hell. **They would only go to hell because of unbelief. **I’m guessing your a “once saved, always saved” type. It doesn’t take away from the sacrifice of Jesus, to say that sacrifices should be made in order to help sinners, it only strengths it, because by sacrfising for sinners we are carrying out Jesus’s decree to love one another. “Sacrifices” has a broad meaning, it can be something as simple as a prayer. Your last sentance distrubs me, but I imagine it shouldn’t. Know this, Jesus’s death and ressurection did not take sin out of the world, rather it provided deliverence from sin. We are all still sinners, merely acknowleging Christ does not save us. “Not all those who say unto me “Lord, Lord” shall enter the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 7:21
My understanding is that even Catholic doctrine indicates that sacrifices will only help those in purgatory, not those who are going to hell, and that sacrifices can only affect the temporal penalty for sins of which the external punishment has been removed through Christ’s sacrifice, whether through baptism or confession.