R
rosarywarrior
Guest
How do you think the world would react if planned parenthood were to offer vasectomies and a 16 year old boy decided he wanted one without his parents permission?
- Status
Y
YADA
Guest
Yes, they would …
But then - Planned Parenthood would never offer that … it would cut into the “Abortion Income” … truly this is a case of "follow the money …
R
rosarywarrior
Guest
Yada- that is true. I was thinking that there would be outrage over it and laws would be made to prevent it due to a boy not being able to consent to such a life changing procedure at such a young age. However, they allow a 16 yr. old girl to consent to an even worse life changing procedure not only for herself but for another human being. You may be right…planned parenthood probably wouldn’t do it because of the loss of the billions they get from the life changing procedures they do on young girls and women. Sad! 
:imsorry:
:imsorry:
C
Christy_Beth
Guest
I wouldn’t be surprised if this were an option sometime in the future. Just think, “Now you can have all the sex you want and don’t have to worry about paying child support, or for an abortion.” But, then, ten years down the road of life, what if the boy changed his mind? I know those are reversable, but it wouldn’t be something that I would want to go thorgh with.
S
Sam_Maloney
Guest
So long as the boys were brown skinned or ‘trailer trash’, the world [meaning the media elite], would be thrilled.
B
burnside
Guest
Why not say so on a secular message board?There are some that would quickly delete it,but there are the fairer ones,and there are those that are not too well moderated,so it will stay on the board long enough for enough people to read it.
N
NTOT
Guest
If the media conditions people to be outraged, they will be outraged. If they condition them not to be outraged, they will not be. People are lemmings.
D
Dale_M
Guest
I don’t think the comparison of vasectomy and abortion is on the same level. Abortion is a one-time procedure, but vasectomy should be considered permanent. True, in some cases it is possible to reverse a vasectomy but the reversal surgery is complex, expensive and has a success rate (if success is measured as the pregnancy of their partner) of only 43%.
caremark.com/wps/portal/HEALTH_RESOURCES?topic=rvasectomy
A
Appleby
Guest
How would the world react if boys were the ones getting pregnant? I believe a feminist once observed that if boys got pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.
O
Oscarthecat
Guest
Is there some kind of movement to allow 16 year old girls to get their tubes tied without parental notification?
A
Appleby
Guest
A local woman was coming into the teen drop-in centre a couple of years ago and offering girls $5,000 if they’d get their tubes tied. She had three takers before someone barred her.
S
Sam_Maloney
Guest
Just because a feminist says it, doesn’t mean its true.
R
rosarywarrior
Guest
Abortion is a one-time procedure that permanently kills the baby, and is permanently embedded in the womans mind which sometimes has horrible consequences throughout her entire life. What I was trying to impress upon people is the fact that no pre-teen or teenager should be considered mature enough to make such a decision on a major invasive medical procedure with lifelong effects. Also some girls will have more than one abortion and her risks for infection, sterility and permanent damage increase.
R
rosarywarrior
Guest
That is so sad and unfortunately true. Have you ever noticed that most abortion centers are in the poorer parts of town? The founder herself Margaret Sanger was a racist who hated the Catholic Church. dianedew.com/sanger.htm
O
Oscarthecat
Guest
That’s just crazy. Margaret Sanger was just a nice lady who didn’t want to see minorities and lower income families “punished with a baby.”
:takeoff:
R
rosarywarrior
Guest
Now I would call that an OBAMA-NATION!
F
Fone_Bone_2001
Guest
And yet that quote is an embarrassment to the pro-choice movement today.
Harsh, nasty, truly pro-abortion rhetoric like that was more common immediately after Roe vs. Wade was passed.
Today, no politician would dare call abortion a sacrament. Instead, it’s, “Oh, abortion is horrible; this is such a complex issue; I believe we have to be very cautious about it; we really can’t take away a woman’s right to choose, though…”
Basically, what I’m saying is this: the pro-life movement has made much rhetorical progress since 1973, if not as much legal progress. Abortion advocates once exulted over the procedure; now, they are so ashamed of it themselves that even they only talk about it in euphemisms.
That’s why you don’t often hear that nasty quote about abortion being a “sacrament” anymore.
T
Tim_Kirchoff
Guest
That “feminist” was more sexist than the men she condemned
It wasn’t an observation, it was an accusation without a shred of proof.
T
Tim_Kirchoff
Guest
B
Blade_and_Blood
Guest
Heh, the little dude’s father would be mad.
Though I must say, it may be less devastating than a woman getting an abortion, or something like that, because, no matter what the Bible says, a man has a lifetime supply of sperm… so there’s really not much being lost here.
A woman has a limit; that’s why egg donors cost way more than sperm donors do.Ironically Yours, Blade and Blood
- Status