What if the Catholic Church actually supported the division so badly craved by "traditional Catholics"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Duesenberg
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyway the divisions are deeper than just which mass is celebrated. Pretending it doesn’t exist and telling everyone to sing Kumbaya won’t make it go away.
I get that the divisions are deeper, but I do not know why you do not want us to pray for help from the Holy Spirit. But you know, in my twenty years as a Catholic, I have never really actually heard that song. Is it really a thing?
 
Last edited:
I see. So let’s forget the people in the pews for a moment. Is the priest encouraging division as well? The local Bishop?
 
I see. So let’s forget the people in the pews for a moment. Is the priest encouraging division as well? The local Bishop?
Exactly how many bishops encourage and facilitate “EF Mass Only” parishes? As I said I understand the charism of groups like the FSSP. That’s en entirely different thing. But to actually create a “EF Mass Only” parish within a diocese using diocesan priests? That’s extremely divisive.

Just imagine for a moment if a group of faithful asked for an EF Mass to be instituted at an existing parish and were told "I’m sorry, that’s an “OF Mass Only” parish. That would be just terrible. The reverse is also true.
 
The Latin mass that’s an hour away from my hometown is EF only…because it’s a FSSP parish.
 
Well, the final decision would rest with the pastor and Bishop. They would say yes or no. No division intended but if this is agreed upon by those in charge, what is the problem? Both forms of the Mass are equally valid, so if a parish decided it’s going to be only one or the other, what is the problem? Division? I don’t think so. And Catholics who are against such an arrangement can certainly petition their Bishop or Archbishop. They would have no luck with just using the internet.
 
but I do not know why you do not want us to pray for help from the Holy Spirit.
I never said you shouldn’t… In fact I don’t even know how you could have gotten that idea.
Just imagine for a moment if a group of faithful asked for an EF Mass to be instituted at an existing parish and were told "I’m sorry, that’s an “OF Mass Only” parish.
Seems to me this probably happens quite often.
 
Last edited:
I never said you shouldn’t… In fact I don’t even know how you could have gotten that idea.
You thought the song Kum Ba Yah was inappropriate even though it is a prayer for the Holy Spirit to come. I have never used that one, but I have used Veni Sancte Spiritus.
 
Last edited:
… I think the song Kumbaya is inappropriate because it’s embarrassingly bad and irreverent.
 
For something “bad” it sure has become a bit of Americana. I have never heard it described as irreverent though. That is a first. My primary reason for ignoring it is that it is trite, and it has been turned by the ignorant into some sort of insult.
 
Last edited:
Seems to me this probably happens quite often.
Any proof? I cannot imagine a pastor or a bishop saying “I’m sorry, but this parish church is an OF Mass-only facility.” That just wouldn’t happen. What I’m sure does happen is that 12 people ask that an EF Mass be instituted at a given parish and the pastor declines because he’s already celebrating 3 Masses each Sunday, each with over 200 attendees and there’s simply no other priestly resources available.
 
Which is effectively the same thing because either way, the desire for a Latin mass is being unmet. And I’ve actually heard plenty of horror stories of uncooperative bishops and priests. Also, since a “Latin Mass parish” is already probably serving a wide area, forcing them to a have Novus Ordo masses would be like forcing every parish in the country to have at least one Latin Mass regardless if there was need or demand. The NO is available. The Latin Mass is not.
For something “bad” it sure has become a bit of Americana. I have never heard it described as irreverent though. That is a first. My primary reason for ignoring it is that it is trite, and it has been turned by the ignorant into some sort of insult.
Trite things are irreverant. Clown mass has a sacrifice too, but it’s still irreverent. As a campfire song, wonderful great awesome, sing your stupid Kumbaya. As a communion song? It’s irreverent.
 
Last edited:
Which is effectively the same thing because either way, the desire for a Latin mass is being unmet.
Are you being serious? You feel not celebrating an EF Mass because there are no priestly resources available is the same as not doing so because a specific parish has been deemed an “OF Mass-Only” parish?

All I can say is that’s silly. Your logic is terribly flawed and your prejudice on this subject, very apparent.
 
I thought that there were several eastern churches and one western church which made up the Catholic Church? Why could not there be two western Catholic churches, one EF and the other OF, to make up the western churches just as there are about 23 churches which make up the eastern Catholic churches?
 
Clown mass has a sacrifice too, but it’s still irreverent. As a campfire song, wonderful great awesome, sing your stupid Kumbaya.
Well, I guess you have an opinion, like everyone else.
 
Last edited:
Why could not there be two western Catholic churches, one EF and the other OF, to make up the western churches just as there are about 23 churches which make up the eastern Catholic churches?
That’s my question. I think it would be ridiculous to break-up the Western Church into individual sui juris churches based on different forms of the Mass, but I’m wondering if that’s what some “traditional Catholics” actually desire?
 
That’s my question. I think it would be ridiculous to break-up the Western Church into individual sui juris churches based on different forms of the Mass, but I’m wondering if that’s what some “traditional Catholics” actually desire?
Some SSPX people want to remain separate from the present Catholic Church, while others want to restore the Church to how it was before 1960.
 
Some SSPX people want to remain separate from the present Catholic Church, while others want to restore the Church to how it was before 1960.
So?

The Church is not going to be changed back to what it was in 1959. The SSPX is bound to remain separate – not matter what the Church actually does.
 
What’s wrong with 1959? I remember writing down a license plate number from that year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top