E
estesbob
Guest
Eternal damnation.What are the negative consequences of a loving, monogamous, homosexual relationship?
Eternal damnation.What are the negative consequences of a loving, monogamous, homosexual relationship?
So if the Church is wrong about this now can we trust anything elsethey have taught us?.
It may be that we just don’t know enough to so thoroughly condemn the actions of this whole segment of our brothers and sisters.
lol, you got me bob. But once again that is not provable, just an opinion. Maybe you will be etarnally damned for not supported homosexuals.Eternal damnation.
Actually, the Old Testament was written by the Jews, and the New Testament is also written by Jews (the Gospels are simply eye-witness accounts written by Jewish men about the actions of Jesus Christ). It was the disciples who then took this information and began spreading the word that Christ is the Messiah prophesied in the Old Testament (again, written by the Jews).Let me just give you my interpretation of the argument that the church cannot err. This fact is supported by the Bible (according to Catholics, but certainly not according to Protestants…so obviously even this fact isn’t completely evident) which was written by Catholics (according to the people on this forum). So the Catholics wrote a book that verify that they cannot err. So the Catholics cannot err because they said as much. Doesn’t seem logical to me.
Thats the thing…we can’t really trust anything they say as 100% truth. You need to think about these things with your own reasons. You shouldn’t just believe something because the church says so.So if the Church is wrong about this now can we trust anything elsethey have taught us?
So Paul, Peter, John, etc are Jews? That is odd that the Catholic Church would canonize Jews.Actually, the Old Testament was written by the Jews, and the New Testament is also written by Jews (the Gospels are simply eye-witness accounts written by Jewish men about the actions of Jesus Christ). It was the disciples who then took this information and began spreading the word that Christ is the Messiah prophesied in the Old Testament (again, written by the Jews).
As for Challam, remember that ANY sexual act between two unmarried individuals is sinful. Remember also that the purpose of marriage is the procreation and education of offspring. Since M+M doesn’t equal children (nor does F+F), homosexual couples do not meet the purposes of marriage. And therefore, because they don’t marry, they are expected to live chaste lives, just like those people who remain unmarried.
Actually I should if I want to be saved. But then again if you don’t accept any authority but yourself there is no basis for discussion,Thats the thing…we can’t really trust anything they say as 100% truth. You need to think about these things with your own reasons. You shouldn’t just believe something because the church says so.
I know my post was way too long, but I did address both of these issues in it.As for Challam, remember that ANY sexual act between two unmarried individuals is sinful. Remember also that the purpose of marriage is the procreation and education of offspring. Since M+M doesn’t equal children (nor does F+F), homosexual couples do not meet the purposes of marriage. And therefore, because they don’t marry, they are expected to live chaste lives, just like those people who remain unmarried.
Where are you getting this information that you need to believe in the Catholic Church to be saved? YOU are the authority for that too, even if you are just listening to the church. You could believe that you need to be a baptist to be saved too, or a muslim, or any other religion…but you picked Catholicism.Actually I should if I want to be saved. But then again if you don’t accept any authority but yourself there is no basis for discussion,
I’ll play along…Great rebuttal! What if I don’t take the Bible or the Church’s teachings as authority? Just tell me a hypothetical…what if the teaching is wrong?
Maybe I should rephrase the question. IF the teaching were to be wrong (hypothetically), would you agree that it would negatively effect the people’s lives who were celibate as homosexuals because of the church teaching? Do you think that their life would be better or worse for listening to this teaching that was hypothetically false.
Human persons are male of female. They have the option to embrace their sex and all that it implies or they struggle against it but it cannot be changed nor can it be denied. A male will only find his sexuality completed in the embrace of a female and vice-versa.Have you guys ever considered this?
When it comes to morality, looking at the morality system that the church uses objectively, it seems to be a pretty good system. Treat others the way you want to be treated is, in my opinion, the greatest moral rule of all. It is something that should be followed by everyone.
…
So, what if the church is wrong about its [moral] teaching on homosexuality?
THIS IS A HYPOTHETICAL! DON’T ARGUE THAT IT IS WRONG AND GIVE ME REASONS FOR IT. THAT ISN’T THE QUESTION. IF YOU CAN’T POSSIBLY IMAGINE THIS HYPOTHETICAL THEN DON’T RESPOND ABOUT HOW THE TEACHING IS TRUE BECAUSE IT ADDS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO THE DISCUSSION.
Bingbang, you seem to like to shoot from the hip, which is good in some situations, but not always for discussion.So Paul, Peter, John, etc are Jews? That is odd that the Catholic Church would canonize Jews.
Our laws are not really based on the Bible. There are a lot of things that are laws that have nothing to do with the Bible, and there are a lot of things that were outlawed in society’s before the Bible even existed.If the church is wrong in this case, then all the other teachings could just as easily be wrong, including the ones you like (treating others as we want to be treated). If this is wrong, the entire foundation for our society, our human race, is wrong…meaningless.
There would be no more reason for law and order, for treating others well. There would be no “right” and “wrong” anymore. It would be for each person to decide. In the long run (several generations), this would lead to a breakdown in morals and a breakdown of our justice system.
The teachings on homosexuality are based in the bible. So is our justice system, our laws. So is our society’s conscience. We know what is right, and what is wrong. It’s been told by God, and passed down for millenia. Some people choose to forget, or pick and choose what they “like.” This is a bad idea, dangerous, and irresponsible!
2000 years of teachings and traditions. For your premise, that homosexuality is moral, to be correct one of two things has to be true;Where are you getting this information that you need to believe in the Catholic Church to be saved? YOU are the authority for that too, even if you are just listening to the church. You could believe that you need to be a baptist to be saved too, or a muslim, or any other religion…but you picked Catholicism.
So what is your reasoning that if you want to be saved, you have to follow the church?
Odd, because homosexuals will not tell you that is true. To be honest I don’t even think that the Catholic Church will tell you that. The church isn’t asking these people to be with the opposite sex, they are asking these people to be celibate…as in they don’t think that these people can be emotionally completed in the embrace of a member of the opposite sex.A male will only find his sexuality completed in the embrace of a female and vice-versa.
I would guess the second one. And not everyone thinks that homosexuality is wrong and have “since the dawn of mankind.” And if god was so keen on correcting people’s religious beliefs, wouldn’t there only be one religion?2000 years of teachings and traditions. For your premise, that homosexuality is moral, to be correct one of two things has to be true;
There is no God
There is a God but he allowed people to be wrong about the morality of homosexual behavior since the dawn of mankind
There is. But many reject it.And if god was so keen on correcting people’s religious beliefs, wouldn’t there only be one religion?
I’d say our most important laws are based on biblical principle. That can be a whole extra thread though. Some of these most important laws include stealing and murder. Yes, some of these things were outlawed before the bible, but the reason they are laws in this country is because they were understood to be bad things…because they are stated as such in the bible.Our laws are not really based on the Bible. There are a lot of things that are laws that have nothing to do with the Bible, and there are a lot of things that were outlawed in society’s before the Bible even existed.
Anyway, as for your argument that “There would be no more reason for law and order, for treating others well” if the church wasn’t right…its a horrible argument. There are plenty of people that are atheists that treat others with decency and respect. So your argument could be “well the fact that God exists lets these people act like this”…but you have absolutely no evidence to back this up. Arguments like this make me think that if certain people lacked religious beliefs they would be complete sociopaths. I hope that isn’t the case.
I know, and I was driving the point home again. You yourself are against gay marriage, and if that prevents sexual activity, I don’t see your reasoning for debate.I know my post was way too long, but I did address both of these issues in it.