What if there were no Hell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter free_thinker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
**Then my friend, You have the logical conclusion of chaos. Why bother if nothing is there right? Then people would kill that boss that they’ve hated for so long, shoot that person, rape her, steal from him etc.

You would basically get a societal meltdown that no one would want to live in. **
No, you would not. I live in a secularized/dechristianized part of North America, but people here don’t kill each other left and right Now, remove police and jail , and then you have total anarchy, chaos, sons killing their father, guys killing girls who don’t reciprocate their feelings, students killing their teachers because they got an F on their finals, and so on.
 
WHAT IF, There were no police ! or there were no jails, would people be committing more crimes knowing that they could not be punished ?

What if there were no courts ? What if this were a country ruled by a king and queen, and we were subjects, and had to serve a king and queen wether or not we liked it ?

what if a frog had wings ?

what if the sun didn’t rise tomorrow ?

what if animals could talk ?

what if farts didn’t stink ?
 
No, you would not. I live in a secularized/dechristianized part of North America, but people here don’t kill each other left and right Now, remove police and jail , and then you have total anarchy, chaos, sons killing their father, guys killing girls who don’t reciprocate their feelings, students killing their teachers because they got an F on their finals, and so on.
Here’s the funny thing. I think many “secular” people are influenced by Christian values, but don’t think of it that way.
 
Here’s the funny thing. I think many “secular” people are influenced by Christian values, but don’t think of it that way.
^ bingo.

If I’m not mistaken, a study was made that has shown that the moral level of a society gradually slips as each successive generation becomes further removed from its religious roots. I’ll try to find that study and provide a link.
 
I THINK I would still act the same way for love of God and Jesus. Of course, you never know unless you’re actually put in the situation.
 
Imagine for a few minutes that there is no such place as Hell. Imagine that the most saintly people and the most despicable members of society had no punishment after death, and that everyone had eternal life and was joined with God. Imagine that there was no place to be saved from, and the purpose of life was only to have experiences in the physical world. If there was no Hell, would you act any differently? How do your actions now reflect on yourself? Do you find yourself fueled to not sin because you are trying to gain an award or because you are trying to avoid punishment?
Ignoring that Hell is actually a consequence of God’s love (and the respect for our freedom that this implies) and so that it’s absence would negate all kinds of things:

We should not act any differently. On good days, I wouldn’t. On bad days, when I wake up just not really caring all that much about anything, then I might.
 
I think a huge problem was that too many priests “back in the day” would constantly have homilies about hell and basically tell everyone in the congregation that they are going to hell. This made people afraid of God and made them drift away from the Church. Although the intention of the priests was good (to remind people of the reality of hell, and what it will be like if we choose to live without God or against God’s will), it was not carried about in the best way. The biggest problem with these speeches is that they only present one side of God: divine justice. But God is infinite. He is also loving and merciful. No sin is too great for God’s forgiveness, if a person is truly sorry and intends to amend his or her life. The focus needs to be on love for God and repenting of one’s sins.

Hell is the logical conclusion of free will. Hell is the absence of God, and the punishment of our sins, to the degree of the sins committed. People choose hell when they choose to go against God’s will, when they choose to sin. They would rather be in hell and live by their own rules than in heaven with God’s rules. God’s presence is actually more painful to these dark souls than it is without Him. When people repent of their sins and strive to do God’s will, and work to properly form their consciences (rather than simply listen to what the TV has to say), that is the path to holiness. Hell is also divine justice. No sin goes unpunished, and there is even purgatory to “clean up” repentant people before they enter heaven.

Also, I’d like to add that there is no official list of who is in hell. The Church has a list of Saints in heaven, but that list is not complete because there are many people who aren’t canonized saints who are also in heaven. The Church simply states what sins are and can tell people they are in danger of hell (e.g. living a sinful lifestyle, not repenting of sins). Even if someone is excommunicated, he or she might not end up in hell. Excommunication means the person cannot receive the Sacraments, sort of like a warning that the soul is in danger, but he or she can still repent and excommunications can eventually be lifted.
 
Imagine for a few minutes that there is no such place as Hell.
Hell is a fundamental piece of reality. It is so deeply engrained into human nature, asking to image its none existence is like asking a human to image his life without electrons floating around his protons; people will give wacky answers, but nobody has any true clue how to image the absence of something so fundamental.
Imagine that the most saintly people and the most despicable members of society had no punishment after death, and that everyone had eternal life and was joined with God. Imagine that there was no place to be saved from, and the purpose of life was only to have experiences in the physical world. If there was no Hell, would you act any differently? How do your actions now reflect on yourself? Do you find yourself fueled to not sin because you are trying to gain an award or because you are trying to avoid punishment?
Disbelief in hell is simple one of many forms of denial documented among humans. For instance, someone who finds out she has cancer may simply pretend it does not exist. Her disbelief doesn’t change the underlying reality. Her disbelief may lead her to avoid doctors or treatment, but it won’t change the symptoms she experiences.

Humans are naturally moral creatures. While someone may live in denial of hell, the underlying reality remains. While someone may engage in mildly more sinful behavior, she will still feel the pangs of guilt occasionally. Thus someone imagining life without hell, is only imaging a slightly different experience they image life with hell.
 
If there were no Hell, then Heaven and Hell would be the same place.

God never sends anyone to Hell. People who die in a state of mortal sin are so opposed to God and His will that they would hate living with God in Heaven and doing His will–let alone for all eternity! So instead, they choose Hell. They suffer for all eternity, but now they can be free from God, just like they wanted to be when they were alive. This is how my priest explained Hell to me. He says some theologians think Heaven and Hell are actually the same place, that maybe the fires of Hell are actually God’s light burning the souls of the damned.

If there were no Hell, then things would be even worse for the damned than they are.
That’s just not true. Matter of fact, I’m pretty sure I have at least one mortal sin on my soul, perhaps numerous mortal sins. Guess where I’d still like to go? I essentially commit sins as a way to stifle rage, to comfort myself for the loneliness and the mortifying feelings of inadequacy and inferiority, not to mention depression, anxiety and hopelessness, not to mention rejection, constant fear of not being liked, in heaven I will be free of all these afflictions, I’ll be with the source of all that is good and beautiful, if I die in the next few hours, I’ll ask God to forgive me, I’ll beg him to accept me, BUT according to Catholic doctrine, he won’t. Please stop sugar-coating hell, loving sin doesn’t mean you don’t want to be with God, same as if you hate working it doesn’t mean you hate money (usually, money is the consequence of working, likewise, I like the fleeting comfort that sin brings and how it makes hopelessness more bearable, but if hell is the consequence, then I hate the consequence of sin and love the consequence of virtue–>God). If you sin by presuming of God’s mercy, you do expect to be accepted by God, you might be in for a surprise. Breaking news: souls who are assigned to hell ,at least some of them, would probably want to be with God, someone who touches a hot stove would rather not feel the burning sensation.
 
Hell is a fundamental piece of reality. It is so deeply engrained into human nature, asking to image its none existence is like asking a human to image his life without electrons floating around his protons; people will give wacky answers, but nobody has any true clue how to image the absence of something so fundamental.

Disbelief in hell is simple one of many forms of denial documented among humans. For instance, someone who finds out she has cancer may simply pretend it does not exist. Her disbelief doesn’t change the underlying reality. Her disbelief may lead her to avoid doctors or treatment, but it won’t change the symptoms she experiences.

Humans are naturally moral creatures. While someone may live in denial of hell, the underlying reality remains. While someone may engage in mildly more sinful behavior, she will still feel the pangs of guilt occasionally. Thus someone imagining life without hell, is only imaging a slightly different experience they image life with hell.
I disagree that hell is deeply ingrained in human nature, unless I’m not human. As I stated in my previous post, it is not a concern in Judaism. If one is raised Catholic, Protestant, or Muslim, for example, hell might become a part of one’s thinking, but it is not part of Jewish teaching.
 
That’s just not true. Matter of fact, I’m pretty sure I have at least one mortal sin on my soul, perhaps numerous mortal sins. Guess where I’d still like to go? I essentially commit sins as a way to stifle rage, to comfort myself for the loneliness and the mortifying feelings of inadequacy and inferiority, not to mention depression, anxiety and hopelessness, not to mention rejection, constant fear of not being liked, in heaven I will be free of all these afflictions, I’ll be with the source of all that is good and beautiful, if I die in the next few hours, I’ll ask God to forgive me, I’ll beg him to accept me, BUT according to Catholic doctrine, he won’t. Please stop sugar-coating hell, loving sin doesn’t mean you don’t want to be with God, same as if you hate working it doesn’t mean you hate money (usually, money is the consequence of working, likewise, I like the fleeting comfort that sin brings and how it makes hopelessness more bearable, but if hell is the consequence, then I hate the consequence of sin and love the consequence of virtue–>God). If you sin by presuming of God’s mercy, you do expect to be accepted by God, you might be in for a surprise. Breaking news: souls who are assigned to hell ,at least some of them, would probably want to be with God, someone who touches a hot stove would rather not feel the burning sensation.
Actually, you may not fully understand Church doctrine on mortal sin and Reconciliation. Yes, we are supposed to go to Reconciliation to be forgiven for our sins. However, if you were to whatever reason die suddenly with mortal sin on your soul, but had had every intention of going to confession because you had repented of your sins, then God would not send you to Hell.
 
One thing I’d like to throw into the mixture. We often call Hell a punishment, and it is. However, it’s a self-inflicted one. God doesn’t damn us, we do it to ourselves with our choices.

Hell isn’t the opposite of Heaven, it’s the absence of good(God). Similar to how dark is the absence of light and cold the absence of heat.

We have God.

We can reject Him and His will(sin).

Thus, absence of good(God) is by our own choice.

Thus, Hell must exist because we create the void of good with our own rejection of good(God).
 
Imagine for a few minutes that there is no such place as Hell. Imagine that the most saintly people and the most despicable members of society had no punishment after death, and that everyone had eternal life and was joined with God. Imagine that there was no place to be saved from, and the purpose of life was only to have experiences in the physical world. If there was no Hell, would you act any differently? How do your actions now reflect on yourself? Do you find yourself fueled to not sin because you are trying to gain an award or because you are trying to avoid punishment?
I am convinced that fear of hell is THE wrong kind of motivation for any Christian and a potential source of some very unhealthy obsessions (for me, the grief of losing a dear one was doubled by the terror about the fate of her soul - and the traditional representation of purgatory as “hellish torment” didn’t help either). If a Christian can bring himself to do good and refrain from doing bad things only or primarily by thinking of hell, then his good behavior is faked and worthless. Loving God, the others and ourselves because we fear hell is impossible. Do we love our fathers and mothers because we fear being beaten, thrown away from the house and disowned?

On the other hand, sins exist, repentance exists - because our sins have consequences (here and now) and we have to live with the burden of these consequences, which can be hell on earth in itself and a strong motivator to avoid sinning again. Not to mention that good behavior has always a reward in itself. So if there’s no hell after we die, it doesn’t mean that there’s no sin and no motivation for doing good and avoiding sin.
 
That’s just not true.*** Matter of fact, I’m pretty sure I have at least one mortal sin on my soul, perhaps numerous mortal sins. Guess where I’d still like to go?***
This is because you don’t understand what heaven is. Heaven is not just pleasure. Heaven is perfect communion with God. It involves a constant acknowledgement that there is nothing more important than God and that all things should be ordered towards God’s will, and all actions are done along these lines. For those not in a state of grace, Heaven would be eternal pain.

In fact, our Eastern brothers say (so far as I understand) that that is the only real difference between heaven and hell - whether we accept or resist this total union with God. God reacts to us in the same way, with love and the desire to bring us to that free communion with Him for which we were created, but our resisting, our refusal of what is so fundamentally a part of who we’re supposed to be is Hell.
I essentially commit sins as a way to stifle rage, to comfort myself for the loneliness and the mortifying feelings of inadequacy and inferiority, not to mention depression, anxiety and hopelessness, not to mention rejection, constant fear of not being liked, in heaven I will be free of all these afflictions, I’ll be with the source of all that is good and beautiful, if I die in the next few hours, I’ll ask God to forgive me, I’ll beg him to accept me, BUT according to Catholic doctrine, he won’t. Please stop sugar-coating hell, loving sin doesn’t mean you don’t want to be with God, same as if you hate working it doesn’t mean you hate money (usually, money is the consequence of working, likewise, I like the fleeting comfort that sin brings and how it makes hopelessness more bearable, but if hell is the consequence, then I hate the consequence of sin and love the consequence of virtue–>God). If you sin by presuming of God’s mercy, you do expect to be accepted by God, you might be in for a surprise. Breaking news: souls who are assigned to hell ,at least some of them, would probably want to be with God, someone who touches a hot stove would rather not feel the burning sensation.
While there are things that can lessen guilt and make a grave act not a mortal sin, a person who completely willingly and knowingly commits grave sins for pretty much any of the reasons you have just said is putting themselves above God, and hence would find heaven unbearable. Again, heaven is not pleasure, nor will God be used merely as a way to escape whatever problems we may have in this life.

No, at death, the choice is between acknowledging that God is perfect good and that all things - and I mean all things, including any hurts we may receive for doing otherwise - are less important than him, or refusing to do so. It is not just a choice between pleasure and pain. Pleasure and pain are just consequences of accepting the truth and fighting it, not the ultimate nature of choice to accept truth or not itself.

This total acceptance of God is heaven. But such acceptance is not total if it is conditional on what makes us feel good or avoid pain. Saying that following God is the most important thing in the world, except when it makes me unhappy is the same as saying that I am the most important thing in the world - and with this attitude we will not accept the perfect union with God in heaven.
 
Actually, you may not fully understand Church doctrine on mortal sin and Reconciliation. Yes, we are supposed to go to Reconciliation to be forgiven for our sins. However, if you were to whatever reason die suddenly with mortal sin on your soul, but had had every intention of going to confession because you had repented of your sins, then God would not send you to Hell.
Actually I do. What if I had a heart attack and all I could think was’ “God have mercy” and had not enough time to even entertain the thought of going to Confession before I expired (the plot thickens).
 
Actually I do. What if I had a heart attack and all I could think was’ “God have mercy” and had not enough time to even entertain the thought of going to Confession before I expired (the plot thickens).
God is merciful. There will be no unjust condemnations to Hell. How God would handle such situations is unknown, but suffice it to say that we need not play such games. We are to do our best to follow what the Church teaches as the normative ways to get to Heaven, and to trust that whatever happens to us will be just. We should keep in mind (though not rely on) that God is not bound by the sacraments.
 
This is because you don’t understand what heaven is. Heaven is not just pleasure. Heaven is perfect communion with God. It involves a constant acknowledgement that there is nothing more important than God and that all things should be ordered towards God’s will, and all actions are done along these lines. For those not in a state of grace, Heaven would be eternal pain.

In fact, our Eastern brothers say (so far as I understand) that that is the only real difference between heaven and hell - whether we accept or resist this total union with God. God reacts to us in the same way, with love and the desire to bring us to that free communion with Him for which we were created, but our resisting, our refusal of what is so fundamentally a part of who we’re supposed to be is Hell.

While there are things that can lessen guilt and make a grave act not a mortal sin, a person who completely willingly and knowingly commits grave sins for pretty much any of the reasons you have just said is putting themselves above God, and hence would find heaven unbearable. Again, heaven is not pleasure, nor will God be used merely as a way to escape whatever problems we may have in this life.

No, at death, the choice is between acknowledging that God is perfect good and that all things - and I mean all things, including any hurts we may receive for doing otherwise - are less important than him, or refusing to do so. It is not just a choice between pleasure and pain. Pleasure and pain are just consequences of accepting the truth and fighting it, not the ultimate nature of choice to accept truth or not itself.

This total acceptance of God is heaven. But such acceptance is not total if it is conditional on what makes us feel good or avoid pain. Saying that following God is the most important thing in the world, except when it makes me unhappy is the same as saying that I am the most important thing in the world - and with this attitude we will not accept the perfect union with God in heaven.
So you’re absolutely positive that no damned, from the first ever soul who was damned to the one who was seconds ago, not one of them would like to be with God in heaven? Without my past, my crummy brain and the weight of both my subhuman lineage and original sin, I don’t think doing God’s will in heaven will cause me too much trouble. You’re right heaven is not pleasure, it is bliss and the fufillment of man’s deepest longings and ultimate destiny—>union with his maker.
 
So you’re absolutely positive that no damned, from the first ever soul who was damned to the one who was seconds ago, not one of them would like to be with God in heaven? Without my past, my crummy brain and the weight of both my subhuman lineage and original sin, I don’t think doing God’s will in heaven will cause me too much trouble. You’re right heaven is not pleasure, it is bliss and the fufillment of man’s deepest longings—>union with his maker.
Yes, I am absolutely certain of this. No one who is in hell would trade his damnation for what heaven actually is.

It’s not about whether or not it causes you trouble. If we say that it is, then we’ve put ourselves above God. It’s about whether we recognize, on the deepest level, that God’s will is all that matters.

And again, there are circumstances which can make a grave act not a mortal sin.
 
I disagree that hell is deeply ingrained in human nature, unless I’m not human. As I stated in my previous post, it is not a concern in Judaism. If one is raised Catholic, Protestant, or Muslim, for example, hell might become a part of one’s thinking, but it is not part of Jewish teaching.
Interesting insight, meltzerboy. This idea of hell is so ingrained in our collective (Catholic) psyches that we assume that it’s the same for everyone on the planet. The “No true Scotsman” could become “No true human”. 😛
 
Robertanthony:

I think you might find the Eastern view of hell useful. As a caveat, I’m fairly certain that it’s actually equivalent to what is said in the Catechism (though at first glance it does not appear to be, and I’ve never been able to find a straight answer), and even if not, the fact that I find it on Eastern Catholic sites as well as Eastern Orthodox sites suggest to me (though does not prove to me) that it at least consistent with the essentials of the faith (that is, that both views are allowed, even if one is more in favor with Western people). But with that disclaimer: easterncatholicspiritualrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/05/god-is-hell.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top