Laws are enforced selectively. Westboro Baptists get a free pass while others don’t. Probably they are tolerated because they make Christians look bad, and WBC actually serves the “gay” agenda better than anyone since “gay” activists want everyone to see “gays” as victims of hate.
Nothing can stop it. It will happen. Sooner than anyone thinks. Only those who lie or who are deceived would think it impossible.
He wouldn’t leave the property until they would tell him that he could opt his child out of being indoctrinated in “gay marriage”. They wouldn’t back down, so he wouldn’t. But since they had the law on their side, he was arrested for “trespassing”. He could not opt his child out without being arrested. This proves the point that when something becomes the law people can go to jail for disobeying it.
A loud and obnoxious fringe group is not very threatening to the state, nor to those who pull the strings in the media, politics and big business. A universal Church that has moral authority behind it and in excess of one billion members is a bit more of an issue.
No to both, for the same reason that the Govt couldn’t force the Church to baptize the dead. The Sacraments would not be valid regardless of what the government says, so it would be impossible.
No. But that doesn’t mean they won’t try. If the United States doesn’t do an about-face I have no doubt that the government will use all its power to force this on the Church since the current admin has already had a complete disregard for the U.S. Constitution by targeting the Catholic Church and other traditional Christians for legal harassment with things like the HHS mandate. Meanwhile, the state-run “mainstream media” bombards the public with propaganda to make people believe that “gay marriage” is a right and that the Catholic Church has a “war on women”.
This is not on the gay agenda, so it will not happen. But gay marriages certainly will.
I understand that, Living Word, but it isn’t his property so if he had to leave, he should have left. There are alternatives, e.g. take your child to another school or don’t send them to school at all. However, it’s true that this is ludicrous.
It’s somewhat peripheral to the discussion, but bisexual isn’t the same as being polyamorous. I’m not sure if that is DaddyGirl’s point, but bisexuals are not necessarily going to advocate polygamy, because that isn’t what bisexuality is.
Doesn’t matter what the people want.
The logical reason why marriage has traditionally been defined by most governments, cultures, and societies throughout history as one man and one woman is one based on biology because that’s what makes a child. But when so-called “same-sex marriage” becomes the law, there’s no reason other than an arbitrary written rule why the government would limit it to two people, and it would then be hypocritical and discriminatory for the state not to change the law to include more than two especially when so-called “same-sex marriage” has no historical precedent while everyone knows that polygamy does have that historical precedent. In the same way, by making so-called “same-sex marriage” the law the state would also forfeit any moral argument against incest. “Marriage equality” and such.
Polygamists want it.
I think if Sharia Law were to be enforced via law polygamy would probably be the least of your worries.
Then the proper thing to do is to dismiss yourself from this worthless debate and go debate something worth debating.
You prove nothing and ask that anything that opposes your thinking be proved…here…
Well, all that proves is that the man was arrested for trespass because he seemingly staged a ‘sit in’ in protest at the school’s policies, which is not the same thing as being arrested for not agreeing with the school policies, as the scare story would have you believe.