FNDRB58;
The competency of girl altar servers of course was not the point I was making but I think you knew that.
Where I read about “feminization” was an article written by a woman. It was a tract on this website. I can get the link for you if you want. The term is not demeaning if you put in the context in which it was given.
**GraceDK : Of course it was demeaning. you didnt try to describe a positive trend in the church but a negative one and used the word “feminization” to do so.
I have heard this insulting expression severel times on Catholic radio severel times over the last 5 years… I have heard it by men, but that a woman might buy into using it doens’t surprise me. It doesn’t make it right though. **
But your sensitivities to this subject are apparent. Also, I never said femininity is a bad thing and I never criticized femininity to describe “all ills”. In fact, if you have read any of my comments you would see that I have yet to mention anything negative about women, as there are none to make. Your arguments make no sense. Accusing me of woman bashing just because I think altar servers should be boys…
No, I take your word “feminization” and from this word of yours I see you don’t appreciate whats feminine. You have said now that this is not your oppinion, and I am happy. Please don’t use this word any more just like you wouldnt use such expressions about other groups in the population.
as is practiced in my own parish, is mighty bold indeed. Surely, you can come up with a better rebuttal than to go into attack mode with unfounded assertions.

VATICAN COMMUNICATION ON FEMALE ALTAR SERVERS
Congregation for Divine Worship
*2) The Holy See respects the decision adopted by certain Bishops for specific local reasons on the basis of the provisions of Canon 230 2. **At the same time, however, the Holy See wishes to recall that it will always be very appropriate to follow the noble tradition of having boys serve at the altar. As is well known, this has led to a reassuring development of priestly vocations. ***Thus the obligation to support such groups of altar boys will always continue.
What is this?.. its saying something without saying something.
Local reasons? All over Europe we use girls as alter servers… because we find it appropriate I guess. It will be appropriate to use boys, yes, but it doesn’t say anything about the inapropriateness of using girls as alter servants. It tells me to support alter boys… I do, and I support alter girls too. i think its great when I see children helping in the Church per se. like Jesus said: Do not hinder them!
Maybe these girls will feel appreciated by the Church and later bring up strong Catholic families or enter religious life because they were welcomed at the alter… Don’t you think?
Why would you believe that girl altar servers might be motivated to raise children who become priests, yet you said earlier that you don’t believe boys being altar servers motivates them to be priests???
I at least believe both could happen, but the pressing need is for priests. Having boy altar servers only, thus more boys on the altar, more readily fosters this vocation. We need vocations! Why you would want to compromise this for the sake of “equality of the sexes” for children is beyond me.
The main point of the quote I cited was this:
"As is well known, this has led to a reassuring development of priestly vocations."
Are you for women priests? If not, would you characterize those who want female priests as trying to feminize the Church? It was in this context that the word “feminization” was used. The use of altar girls is a baby step in that direction and we all know that every big change starts with baby steps.