What Is a Catholic Feminist? (A thoughtful blog post I wanted to share)

  • Thread starter Thread starter LemonAndLime
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I did not make any comment about your thinking skills. My “shock” was at your disparaging comment about the thinking skills of other.
But why this “shock”? And why do you ignore this question?
I would be more than happy to have a respectful, real discussion with anyone who wants to. I do not think that you want one. You try to bring yourself up by putting others down. Say I am whining, that I am ignorant or dishonest, it does not matter to me. It just says a lot about you. Being rude and insulting does not win you points in a discussion.
None of that is correct, apart from the second sentence, which just expresses your opinion, and the last sentence, which is banal and irrelevant, since I have not been rude and insulting, as I have explained. 🤷
 
Agreed. I think it is telling that more than one member has been offended. Clearly, if more than one person is offended, there is a problem.
Very clearly there is a problem. The question is: what? And the answer to that question must be decided by looking at the facts and applying sound reasoning to them, not by making irrational insinuations and stating outright falsehoods, as you are doing.
 
Again severus:

If you have a problem with anything that I have said, please say what specifically you have a problem with and why. If I claim something is obvious/irrational/dishonest/etc., it is because I think it is. I understand, because of what I’ve been doing ‘professionally’ for the last few years, that my critical thinking skills are much better than the average person’s, and that the average person’s are very poor, even when they’ve taken a course in critical thinking. That said, if you can’t see something that I think is obvious/etc., please tell me: “I don’t think what you said in post #whatever is obvious/etc. - can you explain why you think it is?” As it is, it seems like you’re just whining. (If not, then what are you doing? Where is the substance of your charge?)

Can you really not see what is obviously irrational about committing a non sequitur, falsely claiming you didn’t (which implies either ignorance or dishonesty - do you understand that?), then dismissing the whole issue as if it doesn’t matter? Seriously?? I await your clarification.
 
If you have a problem with anything that I have said, please say what specifically you have a problem with and why. If I claim something is obvious, it is because I think it is. I understand, because of what I’ve been doing ‘professionally’ for the last few years, that my critical thinking skills are much better than the average person’s, and that the average person’s are very poor, even when they’ve taken a course in critical thinking. That said, if you can’t see something that I think is obvious, please tell me: “I don’t think what you said in post #whatever is obvious. Can you explain why you think it is?” As it is, it seems like you’re just whining here. You really can’t see what is obviously irrational about committing a non sequitur, falsely claiming you didn’t (which implies either ignorance or dishonesty - do you understand that?), then dismissing the whole issue as if it doesn’t matter? Seriously?? I await your clarification.
Your posting history on this forum suggests otherwise Betterave:rolleyes:

As I have pointed out numerous times before.

Although I enjoy seeing my favorite troll in action again:D
 
Again severus:

If you have a problem with anything that I have said, please say what specifically you have a problem with and why. If I claim something is obvious/irrational/dishonest/etc., it is because I think it is. I understand, because of what I’ve been doing ‘professionally’ for the last few years, that my critical thinking skills are much better than the average person’s, and that the average person’s are very poor, even when they’ve taken a course in critical thinking. That said, if you can’t see something that I think is obvious/etc., please tell me: “I don’t think what you said in post #whatever is obvious/etc. - can you explain why you think it is?” As it is, it seems like you’re just whining. (If not, then what are you doing? Where is the substance of your charge?)

Can you really not see what is obviously irrational about committing a non sequitur, falsely claiming you didn’t (which implies either ignorance or dishonesty - do you understand that?), then dismissing the whole issue as if it doesn’t matter? Seriously?? I await your clarification.
I think you enjoy all this and know very well how rude and insulting you are. Sorry, but I am not going to pander to this warped satisfaction you appear to get from getting a rise out of someone. So please use those superior critica thinking skills of yours to have a discussion with yourself. I do not think anyone of us can meet your exacting standards. Enjoy, lol.
 
I think you enjoy all this and know very well how rude and insulting you are. Sorry, but I am not going to pander to this warped satisfaction you appear to get from getting a rise out of someone. So please use those superior critica thinking skills of yours to have a discussion with yourself. I do not think anyone of us can meet your exacting standards. Enjoy, lol.
I personally find the troll amusing.
 
I think you enjoy all this and know very well how rude and insulting you are.
That is a stupid and groundless remark, given that you are so bent on ignoring everything I actually say.
Sorry, but I am not going to pander to this warped satisfaction you appear to get from getting a rise out of someone.
Gee, that’s too bad. :rolleyes:
So please use those superior critica thinking skills of yours to have a discussion with yourself.
Oh, I will! :rolleyes:
I do not think anyone of us can meet your exacting standards. Enjoy, lol.
Have you made the least effort to understand what my “exacting standards” are? I think not. Is this because you are unable to do so? Again, I think not. I think you choose to respond to my rational remarks angrily and irrationally. You thus fail to meet my “exacting standards,” but I don’t think you are justified in blaming me for that.
 
LOL!

LOL!

Still as stupid and angry as ever I see. LOL!
I see your arguments remain as sophisticated as ever.

And thank you for giving me the traditional troll greeting (an insult)😃
I know you trolls use it as a sign of affection;)
 
That is a stupid and groundless remark, given that you are so bent on ignoring everything I actually say.
Gee, that’s too bad. :rolleyes: Oh, I will! :rolleyes: Have you made the least effort to understand what my “exacting standards” are? I think not. Is this because you are unable to do so? Again, I think not. I think you choose to respond to my rational remarks angrily and irrationally. You thus fail to meet my “exacting standards,” but I don’t think you are justified in blaming me for that.
Your arguments are not rational Betterave.

For instance you responded to the accusation that you were insulting someone by calling their remark stupid (thus insulting the person you were denying insulting).

That is irrational, or at least as stupid as you were accusing the other poster of being.
 
Your arguments are not rational Betterave.

For instance you responded to the accusation that you were insulting someone by calling their remark stupid (thus insulting the person you were denying insulting).

That is irrational, or at least as stupid as you were accusing the other poster of being.
It reminds me of that joke “How dare you suggest I have anger problems!? I’m gonna punch you in the face!” but in this case “How dare you suggest I insulted you, you’re just too stupid to understand me!”
 
It reminds me of that joke “How dare you suggest I have anger problems!? I’m gonna punch you in the face!” but in this case “How dare you suggest I insulted you, you’re just too stupid to understand me!”
More or less.

But I find Betterave funny.

Its like Campy Movies, a so bad its good kind of thing.
 
A Catholic feminist is nothing more than a woman who sees that God created her female and is worthy of respect.She is as much value as a man. she has dignity and shouldn’t be viewed as a man’s subordinate.
 
Did not know they deleted pages, thought they just cshut down threads.
That can happen too. However, I have also seen individual posts partially erased (with a note mentioning the edit) or individual posts totally erased (with no mention.) Pages of comments or even entire threads may vanish when a discussion is deemed completely off the rails.

As for the main topic of this thread, would a Catholic feminist be a particular type of feminist, i.e. someone whose Catholicism flavors their feminism? Is it useful to contrast a Catholic feminist with a feminist Catholic (someone whose feminism flavors their Catholic faith?)
 
A Catholic feminist is nothing more than a woman who sees that God created her female and is worthy of respect.She is as much value as a man. she has dignity and shouldn’t be viewed as a man’s subordinate.
Well said. A man can be a feminist too.
 
That can happen too. However, I have also seen individual posts partially erased (with a note mentioning the edit) or individual posts totally erased (with no mention.) Pages of comments or even entire threads may vanish when a discussion is deemed completely off the rails.

As for the main topic of this thread, would a Catholic feminist be a particular type of feminist, i.e. someone whose Catholicism flavors their feminism? Is it useful to contrast a Catholic feminist with a feminist Catholic (someone whose feminism flavors their Catholic faith?)
Thanks for the clarification.

I would think a Catholic feminist would be a Catholic who is a feminist and all Catholics should be feminists as before Christ all are equal. I would hope that at least the majority of Catholics are feminists too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top