A
ADLIB7043
Guest
Our parish and neighboring parishes have been offering Bible Study programs from Ascension Press. These include the Bible Time Line covering the historical books, the Gospel according to St. Matthew, the Book of Revelation, the Psalms, the Acts of the Apostles, and so forth. I have enjoyed these programs very much and would recommend them to anyone. Recently some of the parishioners coordinating the program have determined that the Ascension Press series is not Catholic enough because it gives a too literal interpretation of Scripture. The series is thought to be too right wing Catholic and they want something more middle of the road Catholic…
Apparently, the series would be more “Catholic” if it questioned whether some of the miracles in the Bible really occurred as described, whether St. Paul really went to all the places given in Acts, and whether the Transfiguration really occurred as described in the Gospels. Personally, I cannot understand how the authors of Sacred Scripture under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit could possibly write something that ordinary people could not read and understand. Was everyone expected to be a Bible scholar? I think this way of reading the Bible borders on heresy because it can lead to denying the historicity of certain events that determine key doctrines of our faith.
I need your help in addressing this issue in our Parish. I am not familiar with other Bible study series to know what is means to be less literal in interpreting Scripture. What would you suggest as an argument for keeping the Ascension Press Series?
Apparently, the series would be more “Catholic” if it questioned whether some of the miracles in the Bible really occurred as described, whether St. Paul really went to all the places given in Acts, and whether the Transfiguration really occurred as described in the Gospels. Personally, I cannot understand how the authors of Sacred Scripture under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit could possibly write something that ordinary people could not read and understand. Was everyone expected to be a Bible scholar? I think this way of reading the Bible borders on heresy because it can lead to denying the historicity of certain events that determine key doctrines of our faith.
I need your help in addressing this issue in our Parish. I am not familiar with other Bible study series to know what is means to be less literal in interpreting Scripture. What would you suggest as an argument for keeping the Ascension Press Series?