I have worked with the enneagram for many years and am surprised to find it regarded as dangerous by the Catholic Church, which I joined this past Easter.
The Enneagram is a powerful tool for analyzing personality. Indeed, it is the only method I have found that fits people accurately. Sometimes knowing a person’s “type” can reveal an almost embarrassing amount of information about why they do what they do. I do not make it a practice to “type” others for that reason.
Its value is in self-revelation and it calls for personal growth. Very simply, a “type” is a pattern of behavior set in childhood to deal with stress. As the person grows and leaves behind the original situation, the pattern has become automatic and thus becomes a distorting template laid upon the real world. Clearly, the task is to recognize the distortions and free oneself from them.
Now, as for workshops that relate the types to sins, etc., this began with an early book by Helen Palmer. Her interest was in proving that the Enneagram lined up with other schools of psychology. Included in that was religious thought – but Ms. Palmer added two deadly sins so that she’d have one for each of the nine Enneagram types, so I wonder what the sins-to-Enneagram-diagram does about that!
I have been sorry to see this valuable tool used to “type” others and then call them on their behavior. It is supposed to be for work on one’s self, not chiding, evaluating, or measuring others.
As for its mystical origin among the Sufis, there’s no evidence of it. Gurdjieff (excuse spelling) may have used it, but that only describes what he did, not the essential nature of the ennegram.
I do not write this to urge anyone to use the enneagram – that’s up to you. Because I do, however, have years of experience with it, I thought my perspective might be of interest.