This is very imaginative indeed. But why do you believe this?
With regards to your question above, I am posting my lastest article in my individual research below.
Applying Biological Concepts into Planets
Evaluations on the Concepts and Theories of Evolution
There are common characteristics among living things. By comparing them with the Earth, we will have a more concrete idea on how the eco-system (the life-cycles inside the planet) works. Thus, we can use the biological concepts (which can be applied on the Earth) as a solid ground to find out the validity of my hypothesis, ‘Planets are living things”. The similarities among living things are the clues to the live symptoms of the planets themselves. I have mentioned before that the planets themselves are alive, although their forms of existences and life expectancies are different from the living organisms inside. In fact, the forms of existences vary among living things.
Other planets in the solar system (in which, they can be reached and observed) are being adopted as the “control experiments” of the Earth. The cross-references in-between the Earth and other planet (i.e. the Mars) will definitely contribute to breakthroughs in our cosmology. This research will help us to find out the guiding principles of the mechanism in our universe. The ages of the planets are obstacles in the comparisons. The process of aging is an inevitable result of every planet. The key elements are the ages of these planets. The end of the “life-cycles” of the planets resulted in the extinctions of the planet without any live symptom. The inter-exchanges of the chemical particles inside a planet are almost invisible in these planets (in which, their life-cycles have come to an end) because of their “ages”. Thus, the symptoms of lives and evidences of civilizations have been demolished by unknown causes before or after their life-cycles have come to an end. The ages of the planets are speculations only.
To begin with, I am going to put the focus on evaluating the Earth with biological theories first in order to find out the similarities in-between the Earth and other living things. The applications of the biological theories on the Earth (e.g. reproduction, “life cycles” – growth and aging) are essential. Reviews on other scientific researches (including those under-developing theories) are necessary and essential. My hypothesis comes across various scientific subjects. Due to my limitations in the professionals for all of them, reviews on existing scientific theories are essential. I am taking up this research as a lifetime project because it is worthy. The “
Definitions of Living Things” as I mentioned in my previous article are diversified in sciences and the proofs of my hypothesis are closely associated with them. The hypothesis “Lives at different levels” is different from the “evolution of species”. The planets are conscious objects. In which, she (the “God”) is thinking in a unity. The forms of presences take the lead in my hypothesis.
First, the “reconstruction” of the definitions of living things is my first approach. Plants (natural vegetations) acts like the organs inside the our bodies. Definitions of living things have to be modified. Two branches come in the first place during the classification of species: (1) Animals and Insects; (2) Plants. Under my hypothesis, the Earth is a living object. Plants are responsible for the interchanges of chemicals inside her body. They carried out the processes of “photosynthesis” which are necessary for her “life-cycles”. In which, their functions are necessary for maintaining the “life-cycles” of the Earth. They are not conscious. However,** “animals and insects” are her offspring. They are conscious.** Therefore, only “animals and plants” can be classified as ‘living things”. Hence, the definitions of the living things have been changed.
Plants are not conscious and cannot be defined as “living things”. They are only organs inside a planet, but the planet itself is CONCIOUS. The questions of consciousness have to be the first criteria for the definitions of living things. “Animals and insects” are the offspring of the planet. All of them are conscious. Plants are not conscious because they are only the organs of the Earth.
If the Earth is conscious, consciousness will become the ONLY definition of living things.
Second, the application of the “evolution” is another approach. The combination of the theories of “evolution” will definitely help to explain the diversification of the offspring of the planet. The Earth is the candle as well as the origin of lives. The planets themselves have “life-cycles” which may be accompanied with the evolutions of their offspring. It is the first attempt to illustrate my hypothesis. The complexity of lives may have cohesions and even in the same progress of the “life-cycles” of our Earth. The simplicity of lives from the beginning and gradually turned out to become more complex forms of lives throughout the time. The extinctions of all species are the end of the “life-cycles” of the planets. The diversification of species in the beginning and it gradually turned into extinctions of all species. Our civilizations are the major triggers for the acceleration of the process of extinctions of species. Thus, it has resulted in the chain effects of extinctions of species and destroyed the “life-cycles” inside the planet. The cohesiveness in-between the “evolutions and extinctions of species” and the “live-cycles” of the planet need further researches.** Under my hypothesis, planets carry out reproductions inside their bodies.** To be more specific, the “evolution and extinction of species” may act as both the “life-cycles” and “reproductions” of the Earth. In the meantime, it proves the Earth has undergone a process of growth. She “grows” from simplicity into complex forms of lives. This approach aims at improving my hypothesis. Evolution is a process of “growth” of the Earth. It is a continuous process in her “life-cycles”.
I am going to develop my hypothesis in the directions above.
God Bless
Teru
