H
HMarieH
Guest
What is the Church that Jesus established in Matt 16:16-18 upon Peter’s confession, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Was this the Catholic Church being established or just Christ’s Church?
If I’m not mistaken, it is the walking aid that’s leaning in a corner of his office, which he never uses, since he is perfect.What is God’s Chruch?
It was both. The Catholic Church is Christ’s Church.What is the Church that Jesus established in Matt 16:16-18 upon Peter’s confession, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Was this the Catholic Church being established or just Christ’s Church?
Is this a trick question? Jesus built his Church on Peter (and the other apostles, Ephesians 2:20), not on Peter’s confession. The forced intepretation that Jesus established his Church on Peter’s confession and not on Peter himself is a modern tradition of men that nulifies the word of God. In response to Simon’s confession and because of it, Jesus renamed him Peter (Greek: Petros, which means Rock) and said that upon this rock he would build his Church. For a good study of Matthew 16:13-19, see Catholic Answers apologist Jimmy Akin’s article, The Papacy: God’s gift to the Church.What is the Church that Jesus established in Matt 16:16-18 upon Peter’s confession, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Was this the Catholic Church being established or just Christ’s Church?
It may be a trick question to get things going, but the answer remains the same! I agree with Grace and Glory - “Both”..
Yes, my question was a trick question. I used it to get things going here.
Apples and Oranges.I read the link that Mr. Todd Easton gave to me. I feel that answering his disagreement might be rather arduous. In John 1:42 we see Simon being renamed Cephas. I hope makes some sense to everone reading. 1 Cor 1:12-13 shows many people at Corinth calling themselves after various men, among them is Cephas. Peter was not crucified nor are we baptized into Peter. What I am saying is that the Catholic Church seems to be a group of people, or rather the decendants and followers thereof, that called themselves after Peter.
Wasn’t the Church established on Peter’s confession? Do you not know what Peter’s confession was? It was Christ and his true existance. The true cheif cornerstone of the Church was Jesus. Isaiah 28:16 prophecies of this cornerstone. Matt 21:42 mentions how at first the cheif cornerstone was rejected by the builders. Acts 4:10-11 says that Jesus is the cheif cornerstone. Isaiah 28:16 says that this stone, and not Peter, would be used for the foundation.
Yes, my question was a trick question. I used it to get things going here.
I always thought this was the best evidence. People can argue all day about who or what the rock is (I believe it’s Peter), but I don’t see how one can argue with the keys passage when compared to this passage from Isaiah. King David, if I’m not mistaken, prefigures Jesus so this comparison is pretty straightforward. I think what many Protestants forget–because they are waiting for the Millenium when Jesus will physically rule on earth–is that Christ is ruling as King now. And as King, He has delegated some authority to His representative until He returns, just as David did above.You’ll notice in Isaiah 22: 20-22, where the keys to the kingdom give the prime minister the power to run the kingdom (“What you shall shut, none shall open. What you open, none shall shut…”) until the king returns.
I’m not sure if David pre-figures Jesus (although I won’t argue with you, there), but David does set the precedent for the kingship of Messiah, which is prophesied to come from the House of David.I always thought this was the best evidence. People can argue all day about who or what the rock is (I believe it’s Peter), but I don’t see how one can argue with the keys passage when compared to this passage from Isaiah. King David, if I’m not mistaken, prefigures Jesus so this comparison is pretty straightforward. I think what many Protestants forget–because they are waiting for the Millenium when Jesus will physically rule on earth–is that Christ is ruling as King now. And as King, He has delegated some authority to His representative until He returns, just as David did above.
Christ is the head of the Church, not the Pope, and not Peter. Eph 1:22 and Eph 5:23 show that Christ is the head of the Church.
What did Peter do with the key to the kingdom? Just what the Holy Spirit told him to. Does anyone have the Holy Sporit whispering things in our mind of reform that one might be Pope?
Peter did not do what he pleased to as just a man but as a man of God. An office, not Pope, that we do see in the Bible is that of an elder and that of a deacon. They are seen in 1 Tim 3 Where did we decide that we were do have a Pope?
No. It was established upon Peter, the person, previously called Simon Bar Jonah. Jesus gave him a new name, “Kepha” (rock) “and upon this rock I will build my church.”Wasn’t the Church established on Peter’s confession?
You won’t find the word “Pope” in the Bible. You do find the idea of offices and a skeletal heirarchy of priests and bishops both in scripture and in the histories of the early church. (get the book called The Four Witnesses - it’s a fabulous compendium of the most important facts recorded by the early church fathers - fascinating material!)An office, not Pope, that we do see in the Bible is that of an elder and that of a deacon. They are seen in 1 Tim 3 Where did we decide that we were do have a Pope?
First off, no one is saying Christ isn’t head of the Church. The pope is most definitely a servant of Jesus. Now, you also need to acknowlegde that Jesus doesn’t change someone’s name just because he’s His buddy and He feels like giving him a nickname. It’s all for a reason–and a significant one at that.Wasn’t the Church established on Peter’s confession? Do you not know what Peter’s confession was? It was Christ and his true existance. The true cheif cornerstone of the Church was Jesus. Isaiah 28:16 prophecies of this cornerstone. Matt 21:42 mentions how at first the cheif cornerstone was rejected by the builders. Acts 4:10-11 says that Jesus is the cheif cornerstone. Isaiah 28:16 says that this stone, and not Peter, would be used for the foundation.
Can we agree upon that, that Jesus was the foundation for the Church the Cheif cornerstone?
Christ is the head of the Church, not the Pope, and not Peter. Eph 1:22 and Eph 5:23 show that Christ is the head of the Church.
What did Peter do with the key to the kingdom? Just what the Holy Spirit told him to. Does anyone have the Holy Sporit whispering things in our mind of reform that one might be Pope?
Peter did not do what he pleased to as just a man but as a man of God. An office, not Pope, that we do see in the Bible is that of an elder and that of a deacon. They are seen in 1 Tim 3 Where did we decide that we were do have a Pope?
Well, I read New Testament Greek. Right off, your article starts out disparaging the men who learned the faith at the feet of the Apostles as the “so-called Church Fathers.” Hardly an optimistic beginning.I am going to leave this argument to someone who has studied the Bible longer than I have and knows more greek and hebrew than I do. Please take a look at this site which breaks it all down into tiny pieces.
bible.ca/ef/expository-matthew-16-18.htm