What is "In Ioh. Evang."?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wbeckham78
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

wbeckham78

Guest
I am reading Pope Francis recent encyclical, “Lumen Fidei”. Going through the footnotes I find a reference citing “Cf. In Ioh. Evang., 45, 9: PL 35, 1722-1723.” From the text it appears to be a writing of St. Agustin, but I can’t find a source that gives me the complete title of what writing is being referenced or even the full title. I was hoping to read most of the original source material in context, but while a web search turns up lots of references to Ioh. Evang.,(including one apparently written by St. Thomas Aquinas) none of them appear to be the complete source document.

Or am I all wet?

Any help greatly appreciated!
  • Wayne
 
Interesting question! You are already deeper into this than I am, but I was curious to see if a bit of internet searching could yield the answer, and I’m stumped!

I agree that from the context in Lumen Fidei it seems to be the work of Augustine, but googling for *Augustine “In Ioh. Evang” *just brings up similar references in footnotes without any explanation of what “In Ioh. Evang” is!

Now I’m curious!
 
Your question stimulated my interest and I did my own search. I used the site augustinus.it which is the most complete, at least in the Italian and Latin version.

The work you are looking for is PL 35 “IN EVANGELIUM IOANNIS TRACTATUS CENTUM VIGINTI QUATUOR” (124 treatises on the Gospel of John), treatise number 45, paragraph number 9. I could not find an English translation, but here is the Latin:

9. Sed non audierunt eos oves. Maior haec quaestio est, non audierunt eos oves. Ante adventum Domini nostri Iesu Christi, quo humilis venit in carne, praecesserunt iusti, sic in eum credentes venturum, quomodo nos credimus in eum qui venit. Tempora variata sunt, non fides. Quia et ipsa verba pro tempore variantur, cum varie declinantur: alium sonum habet: Venturus est; alium sonum habet: Venit: mutatus est sonus, venturus est, et venit: eadem tamen fides utrosque coniungit, et eos qui venturum esse, et eos qui eum venisse crediderunt. Diversis quidem temporibus, sed utrosque per unum fidei ostium, hoc est per Christum, videmus ingressos. Nos credimus Dominum Iesum Christum natum ex Virgine, venisse in carne, passum esse, resurrexisse, in coelum ascendisse: totum hoc, sicut verba auditis praeteriti temporis, impletum esse iam credimus. In eius sunt fidei societate nobiscum et illi patres, qui crediderunt de Virgine nasciturum, passurum, resurrecturum, in coelum ascensurum: illos enim ostendit Apostolus ubi ait: Habentes autem eumdem spiritum fidei, sicut scriptum est: Credidi, propter quod locutus sum; et nos credimus, propter quod et loquimur Propheta dixit: Credidi, propter quod locutus sum: Apostolus dicit: Et nos credimus, propter quod et loquimur. Ut scias autem quod una sit fides, audi dicentem: Habentes eumdem spiritum fidei, et nos credimus. Sic et alio loco: Nolo enim vos ignorare, fratres, quia patres nostri omnes sub nube fuerunt, et omnes per mare transierunt, et omnes in Moysen baptizati sunt, in nube et in mari, et omnes eamdem escam spiritalem manducaverunt, et omnes eumdem potum spiritalem biberunt. Mare Rubrum significat Baptismum; Moyses ductor per mare Rubrum significat Christum; populus transiens significat fideles; mors Aegyptiorum significat abolitionem peccatorum. In signis diversis eadem fides: sic in signis diversis, quomodo in verbis diversis; quia verba sonos mutant per tempora, et utique nihil aliud sunt verba quam signa. Significando enim verba sunt: tolle significationem verbo, strepitus inanis est. Significata ergo sunt omnia. Numquid non eadem credebant, per quos haec signa ministrabantur, per quos eadem quae credimus, prophetata praenuntiabantur? Utique credebant: sed illi ventura esse, nos autem venisse. Ideo et sic ait: Eumdem potum spiritalem biberunt. Spiritalem eumdem, nam corporalem non eumdem. Quid enim illi bibebant? Bibebant enim de spiritali sequente petra: petra autem erat Christus. Videte ergo, fide manente, signa variata. Ibi petra Christus, nobis Christus quod in altari Dei ponitur. Et illi pro magno sacramento eiusdem Christi biberunt aquam profluentem de petra; nos quid bibamus norunt fideles. Si speciem visibilem intendas, aliud est: si intellegibilem significationem, eumdem potum spiritalem biberunt. Quotquot ergo illo tempore crediderunt vel Abrahae, vel Isaac, vel Iacob, vel Moysi, vel aliis Patriarchis, aliisque Prophetis Christum praenuntiantibus, oves erant, et Christum audierunt: non alienam vocem, sed ipsius audierunt. Iudex fuerat in praecone. Quia et quando iudex loquitur per praeconem, exceptor non facit : Praeco dixit; sed: Iudex dixit. Alii sunt ergo quos non audierunt oves, in quibus non erat vox Christi, errantes, falsa dicentes, inania garrientes, vana fingentes, miseros seducentes.

I hope that this can be useful to you in some way.
 
Thank you to everyone who replied - you are all awesome! Given what Pope Francis was referring to, this is definitely the correct answer. I never would’ve found that! The reference in Lumen Fidei comes in chapter(?) 15:

Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day; he saw it and was glad" (Jn 8:56). According to these words of Jesus, Abraham’s faith pointed to him; in some sense it foresaw his mystery. So Saint Augustine understood it when he stated that the patriarchs were saved by faith, not faith in Christ who had come but in Christ who was yet to come, a faith pressing towards the future of Jesus (In Ioh. Evang., 45, 9: PL 35, 1722-1723.)

I’m trying to put the encyclical in Logos Personal Book format, using the software, as often as possible, to point to the original sources. Sometimes the interpretations the Holy Father takes from some of the passages are hard for me to understand. I find that reading the citations in context helps. Well, at least helps me! 🙂

Here’s the Logos translation, taken from Augustine of Hippo. (1888). Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel according to St. John. (J. Gibb & J. Innes, Trans., P. Schaff, Ed.)A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series: St. Augustin: Homilies on the Gospel of John, Homilies on the First Epistle of John, Soliloquies. New York: Christian Literature Company.

“But the sheep did not hear them.” This is a more important point, “the sheep did not hear them.” Before the advent of our Lord Jesus Christ, when He came in humility in the flesh, righteous men preceded, believing in the same way in Him who was to come, as we believe in Him who has come. Times vary, but not faith. For verbs themselves also vary with the tense, when they are variously declined. He is to come, has one sound; He has come, has another: there is a change in the sound between He is to come, and He has come: yet the same faith unites both,—both those who believed that He would come, and those who have believed that He is come. At different times, indeed, but by the one doorway of faith, that is, by Christ, do we see that both have entered. We believe that the Lord Jesus Christ was born of the Virgin, that He came in the flesh, suffered, rose again, ascended into heaven: all this, just as you hear verbs of the past tense, we believe to be already fulfilled. In that faith a partnership is also held with us by those fathers who believed that He would be born of the Virgin, would suffer, would rise again, would ascend into heaven; for to such the apostle pointed when he said, “But we having the same spirit of faith, according as it is written, I believed, and therefore have I spoken; we also believe, and therefore speak.” The prophet said, “I believed, therefore have I spoken:” the apostle says, “We also believe, and therefore speak.” But to let you know that their faith is one, listen to him saying, “Having the same spirit of faith, we also believe.” So also in another place, “For I would not have you ignorant, brethren, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea: and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; and did all eat the same spiritual meat, and did all drink the same spiritual drink.” The Red Sea signifies baptism; Moses, their leader through the Red Sea, signifies Christ; the people, who passed through, signify believers; the death of the Egyptians signifies the abolition of sins. Under different signs there is the same faith. It is with different signs as with different words [verbs]; for verbs change their sounds through the tenses, and verbs are indeed nothing else than signs. For they are words because of what they signify: take away the meaning from a word, and it becomes a senseless sound. All, therefore, have become signs. Was not the same faith theirs by whom these signs were employed, and by whom were foretold in prophecy the very things which we believe? Certainly it was: but they believed that they were yet to come, and we, that they have come. In like manner does he also say, “They all drank the same spiritual drink;” “the same spiritual,” for it was not the same material [drink]. For what was it they drank? “For they drank of the spiritual Rock that followed them; and that Rock was Christ.” See, then, how that while the faith remained, the signs were varied. There the rock was Christ; to us that is Christ which is placed on the altar of God. And they, as a great sacramental sign of the same Christ, drank the water flowing from the rock: what we drink is known to believers. If one’s thoughts turn to the visible form, the thing is different; if to the meaning that addresses the understanding, they drank the same spiritual drink. As many, then, at that time as believed, whether Abraham, or Isaac, or Jacob, or Moses, or the other patriarchs or prophets who foretold of Christ, were sheep, and heard Christ. His voice, and not another’s, did they hear. The Judge was present in the person of the Crier. For even when the judge speaks through the crier, the clerk does not make it, The crier said; but the judge said. But others there are whom the sheep did not hear, in whom Christ’s voice had no place,—wanderers, uttering falsehoods, prating inanities, fabricating vanities, misleading the miserable.

There’s undoubtedly other references that I’ll find equally baffling, so I’ll probably be back. Thank you all! :clapping:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top