I apologise for the length of this reply.
With all this debate and discussion in the world about gay “marriage”, I feel that we as the Church have been on the backfoot instead of actually clearly laying out what Christian marriage is and means in its fullness. So, I ask you, what is Marriage?
Need an argument to oppose same sex marriage?
I recommend reading these -
Why Homosexual Unions Are Not Marriage’s -
catholic.com/sites/default/files/why_homosexual_unions_are_not_marriages.pdf
Rebuttals to arguments for same sex marriage -
osv.com/tabid/7621/itemid/10339/Rebuttals-to-arguments-for-samesex-marriage.aspx
You ask a Catholic, an Anglican, a Pentecostal, and Eastern Orthodox or Oriental, a Lutheran, a Baptist, a Mormon, a Muslim, a Hindu and a Buddhist, and you would get ten different answers on what a marriage is.
None of which would include same sex though (A very right winged one might).
Your definatly correct though Reuben J, thats what got us into this mess in the first place I think, people keep dropping the bar on marriage and ultimatley society will be the worse off for it.
What this really comes down to, is whether or not you think the sexual acts of homosexuality is moral and ought to be advocated for society. It’s whether or not you think that the sexual acts of homosexuality are equivalent to the sexual act of heterosexuals thats targeted towards procreation.
We must remember that same sex marriage
doesn’t legalise a homosexual union, it recognises it as equivalent to a heterosexual union, it equates the sexual acts of homosexuality with moral family life.
I have nothing against homosexuals, Im simply against the sexual acts of homosexuality being “encouraged” and “normalised” with same sex marriage.
I would never throw stones or anything if a homosexual gave into such desires out of weakness, however I will be in opposition when they try to claim that such acts are no longer immoral.
Mathew 19:4-6
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”
17 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters:
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
5 And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth.
22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
I brought up Leviticus 18:22 to show that in the time period when “revelation” was written, the sexual acts of homosexuality was labelled as “abomination” which is mentioned several times in revelation.
Now I am not saying that it is the end of the world or anything, but the more sexually immoral our society becomes, the closer this will be and those who are in favor of same sex marriage are advocating it.
I would also like to say that the people we need to reach most of all are Chrsitians I think, because Christians are apparently the largest supporters of same sex marriage and It is thoroughly ahistorical to imagine that Jesus approved of homosexuality (and yet that revolutionary statement never made it into the NT, even though the radical-enough discussion of Gentile circumcision did). It conflicts with the history, anthropology, and cuture of the time. Anyone who manipulates the text to arrive at the “conclusion” that Christ would see nothing wrong with same sex marriage is being disingenuous, or eisegetical for personal or political reasons.
When debating same sex marriage, people will continually try to make you come up with a secular argument for them to debunk, but there is no such thing as secular morality.
Without God, morality is subjective and than it is nothing but subjective opinion, thus will never work. I think the best way would probably be to humbly preach the gospels to Christians who are supporting same sex marriage, to let them know that what they are really supporting is sexual immorality.
Please continue to next post -